• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

What to do, Bad Pro M sensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mustang30240
  • Start date Start date Feb 11, 2008
M

Mustang30240

Member
Jun 6, 2005
46
0
6
Feb 11, 2008
#1
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #1
I bought a used 75mm Pro M MAF turns out the sensor is bad, I swapped in a stock sensor and it idles great. I have a 73mm C&L maf that I could just buy a new sample tube for and be fine. What would you all do?
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Feb 11, 2008
#2
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #2
What does it do with the Pro-M in that makes you think it's bad. Pro-Ms are definitely not known for great quality. Is it programmed for the correct injectors??
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Feb 11, 2008
#3
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #3
send it back and have it gone over they will fix them at PMAS
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Feb 11, 2008
#4
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #4
blackened88lx said:
What does it do with the Pro-M in that makes you think it's bad. Pro-Ms are definitely not known for great quality. Is it programmed for the correct injectors??
Click to expand...

Really?
From everything I have read they seem to be the most reliable...Mine has never given me anything but flawless operation.

OP- I'd sent it to PMAS and have it rebuilt
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Feb 11, 2008
#5
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #5
Blackened's sentence kinda reads like he didn't mean to put "not" in it. Sounds at first like he thinks it's still good.

Whether it needs to be fixed or not, use the pro m at all costs over a c&l.
 

blackened88lx

Active Member
Aug 9, 2006
0
4
28
Connecticut
Feb 11, 2008
#6
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #6
I was asking what he meant by "bad". I have heard a lot of bad things about the accuracy of Pro-M meters because of the way that they read the air. Not really of them going "bad", just the quality/accuracy.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Feb 11, 2008
#7
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #7
Not sure where you read that, but pro m has pretty much been the only good meter for a fox body, pretty much ever.
The sampling tube method used by a c&l takes inaccurate to a whole new level.
 
M

Mustang30240

Member
Jun 6, 2005
46
0
6
Feb 11, 2008
#8
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #8
I can tell the sensor is bad because I put in the stock sensor I used on the C&L and it idles a lot smoother, When you unplug the Pro-M sensor the car idles the same
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Feb 11, 2008
#9
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #9
2000xp8 said:
Not sure where you read that, but pro m has pretty much been the only good meter for a fox body, pretty much ever.
The sampling tube method used by a c&l takes inaccurate to a whole new level.
Click to expand...

LOL @ C&L

All things I have read point to the same thing, that the sample tube method that C&L uses is unreliable.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Feb 11, 2008
#10
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #10
Dump the codes and see if you get a code 66. If you do, then the MAF sensor element is defective.

If you don't gett a 66 code, then see the "Help me create the Surging Idle Checklist" at http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=698148
for help with your idle problems. The first two posts contain all the updates to the fixes. I continue to update it as more people post fixes or ask questions.



Here's how to dump the codes and see what the computer says is wrong…Codes may be present in the computer even if the Check Engine light isn’t on.

Here's the link to dump the computer codes with only a jumper wire or paper clip and the check engine light, or test light or voltmeter. I’ve used it for years, and it works great. You watch the flashing test lamp or Check Engine Light and count the flashes.

See http://www.troublecodes.net/Ford/





IF your car is an 86-88 stang, you'll have to use the test lamp or voltmeter method. There is no functional check engine light on the 86-88's except possibly the Cali Mass Air cars.



89 through 95 cars have a working Check Engine light. Watch it instead of a test lamp.



Codes have different answers if the engine is running from the answers that it has when the engine isn't running. It helps a lot to know if you had the engine running when you ran the test.

Trouble codes are either 2 digit or 3 digit, there are no cars that use both 2 digit codes and 3 digit codes.

For those who are intimidated by all the wires & connections, see http://www.actron.com/product_detail.php?pid=16153 for what a typical hand scanner looks like. Normal retail price is about $30 or so at AutoZone or Wal-Mart.

Or for a nicer scanner see http://www.midwayautosupply.com/pc-7208-90-equus-digital-ford-code-reader-3145.aspx – It has a 3 digit LCD display so that you don’t have to count flashes or beeps.. Cost is $30.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Pro-M 75MM Bullet Flow Sheet - Is this calibrated for 36 # injectors?
  • dan50
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
244
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jan 11, 2026
dan50
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
590
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Today at 9:59 AM
spilly
S
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
A
P0036 P0056 P0137 P0157 2020 Ford Mustang GT
  • AmkoA
  • Tuesday at 1:55 AM
  • 2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
33
2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk Tuesday at 1:55 AM
AmkoA
A
Engine 95 GT and 95 Cobra sensors and TB gasket
  • Sonic
  • Dec 21, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
308
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Dec 23, 2025
WhiteCobra95
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?