• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

What to do with EFI 302?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hvymtl939
  • Start date Start date Mar 14, 2011
H

hvymtl939

New Member
Mar 13, 2011
5
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Mar 14, 2011
#1
  • Mar 14, 2011
  • #1
Hey, new member here, just had a few questions. My grandpa had a 1991 F-150 that had a rebuilt EFI 302 with only 9k on it when he wrecked the truck. He gave the truck to me, and my dad and I are trying to find something to do with the motor.

A fox body swap would probably be easiest, but I'm really not a fan of the fox body look. So that leads me to my next question, is it at all possible (or reasonable) to do a 5.0 swap into a 94-95 V6? From what I understand, the ECU and gauges would need to be changed, as well as motor mounts, rear end, and driveshaft, as well as beefing up the front suspension. Also, if I found a 94-04 GT roller, would the 5.0 fit the 4.6 motor mounts, or is this also going to be way more difficult then it's worth? Or should I be a man, just suck it up, and buy a fox body?

Any and all advice is appreciated.

-Andrew
 

Chythar

Recently finished repairing my rear
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2004
2,373
140
113
Foothill Ranch, CA
Mar 14, 2011
#2
  • Mar 14, 2011
  • #2
I did that swap not too long ago, though I had a donor 95 Cobra going into a 94 V6. You are right on most counts there, the 5.0 will drop right into a 94-95 V6. I believe you will have to start replacing chassis harnesses if you use a 96-98 V6 chassis, though I cannot say for sure. You can use a 94-95 roller and it will be a perfect drop-in, as the 94-95 GT's also had 5.0's. 96 and up had 4.6 modular engines, and the 5.0 will not bolt in; you would have to change out the k-member.

The type of 302 you have will really depend on how easy or hard the swap will be. 94-95 5.0's used different front accessories and a different intake than the Fox's. We also have an electric fan instead of a clutch fan. If you have a rebuilt stock motor, and the photos I see online are right, you basically have a Fox 5.0. If you want a stock-looking 94-95 GT engine, you might be better off finding one with a bad engine, and swapping over the accessories to your newer engine.
 
H

hvymtl939

New Member
Mar 13, 2011
5
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Mar 14, 2011
#3
  • Mar 14, 2011
  • #3
Thanks for the reply man. I really prefer the sn-95 look to a fox, so I was hoping the swap wouldn't be too terrible.
 
H

hvymtl939

New Member
Mar 13, 2011
5
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Mar 14, 2011
#4
  • Mar 14, 2011
  • #4
Also, we have the 5 speed from the truck, but I assume that the mustangs use a different transmission?
 

Chythar

Recently finished repairing my rear
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2004
2,373
140
113
Foothill Ranch, CA
Mar 14, 2011
#5
  • Mar 14, 2011
  • #5
Mustangs use a t-5 transmission, I don't know what was in the truck. There are different versions of the T-5, used in different makes and models of cars. The 94-95 one has a specific bellhousing and input shaft so the shifter is in the correct place; the Fox's equivalent parts are a bit shorter but work the same.

I don't know if the tranny you have will fit. If it does fit but isn't a t-5, you'll have to find a driveshaft that will fit. Unless you have a high budget or enjoy messing with mismatched parts, I'd highly recommend sticking with OEM 94-95 Mustang parts when possible. Less hassle trying to get everything working together, but that's just my opinion.
 
9

95Monky

Member
Jan 3, 2003
179
0
17
Chico, CA
Mar 14, 2011
#6
  • Mar 14, 2011
  • #6
Not worth the trouble and money involved. 94-95 gt can be found cheap if you want to work on it that much.

The reason I say that is because the motor you want to put into the car will need work to be even on par with a stock mustang 5.0.. someone correct me if im wrong.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,638
214
Acworth, GA
Mar 14, 2011
#7
  • Mar 14, 2011
  • #7
95Monky said:
Not worth the trouble and money involved. 94-95 gt can be found cheap if you want to work on it that much.

The reason I say that is because the motor you want to put into the car will need work to be even on par with a stock mustang 5.0.. someone correct me if im wrong.
Click to expand...

+1. You're going to end up spending about double what it cost to just buy a 5.0 Mustang. And that's before you factor your time in.

Kurt
 
H

hvymtl939

New Member
Mar 13, 2011
5
0
0
Lawrence, KS
Mar 15, 2011
#8
  • Mar 15, 2011
  • #8
Thanks for the advice guys! After doing more research, I've decided it wouldn't be worth the time, money, or effort. However, my Dad is going today to look at a 66 coupe rolling chassis, so this motor still may find a home.
 

Last5.0

Active Member
Nov 9, 2003
404
1
26
Mar 15, 2011
#9
  • Mar 15, 2011
  • #9
Agreed with the above suggestions. I used to have a beater '89 F150 that had a 302 and it wasn't the HO version that's in the mustangs and I believe had a different firing order or something like that. It should work well in a classic though.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,638
214
Acworth, GA
Mar 15, 2011
#10
  • Mar 15, 2011
  • #10
It will probably work good in a classic with a different cam. The heads probably flow just fine being truck heads.

Kurt
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
497
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
264
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
908
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
R
Rcapri - 1980 Capri, bought new by inlaws
  • RCapri
  • Sep 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
779
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 20, 2025
manicmechanic007
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?