What Urethane Engine And Trans Mount Do You Guys Recommend?

[killer5.0]

Going to be replacing my stock k member (installing a MM piece) ..looking to pick up some new motor mounts. I have an energy suspensions urethane tranny mount now and i have a driveshaft (frpp aluminum d/s) rub issue and ive heard of other people having the same issue. Looking for the best quality/fitting mounts.

Thanks

 

[Chuckman]

energy for me. i know on the trans side theres an extra plate (maybe for extra preload on the urethane?) that iirc i left out for tunnel clearance with the old tko.

 

[mikestang63]

You will notice an increased amount of noise and vibration with both poly engine and trans mounts.

 

[Nutty 5.o]

Not sure the case these days, but I've had both ES and Prothane. The ES seemed to be a bit smaller for both motor and engine than the Prothane's I put in my 90 months back. Beffier Prothane's were a bit trickier to fit in the engine mounts than ES's were years back but if you're doing a K member, shouldn't matter.

 

[stanglx2002]

Stay away from the Prothane motor mounts in my opinion. I have them and they raise the engine up from 1/2"-1", which is the reason why I will be taking them off my engine when the time comes.

I am just going to go with the standard convertible motor mounts.

 

[killer5.0]

Ive been doing some reading and the energy suspension mounts seem to be about the same height as the conv mounts?

 

[stanglx2002]

Ive been doing some reading and the energy suspension mounts seem to be about the same height as the conv mounts?

You are correct

 

[Mustang5L5]

So energy suspension poly mounts are the shorter convertible mounts?

Edit. Apparently I can't read