• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

What Will Happen If I.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter spoolin25psi
  • Start date Start date Dec 9, 2005
S

spoolin25psi

New Member
Nov 27, 2005
15
0
0
Dec 9, 2005
#1
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #1
Christmas is almost here and i wouldnt mind getting a throttle body. if i ask santa for a 75mm throttle body and egr spacer how would it effect my 87 5.0 mustang? mods include (not much)
ported heads, 1 3/4 long tubes, and under drive pulleys, next week im installing an f-303 cam, ford racing hardened push rods, and roller rockers

if this throttle body is overkill, what size throttle body should i get?
thanks and Happy Holidays :SNSign:
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Dec 9, 2005
#2
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #2
Is your car still SD? if so, the cam swap (although not impossilbe) is not recommended. Swapping heads, Intake and exhaust will be OK but the cam will cause vacuum problems.

For a N/A car, 65mm throttle body is probably all you will need. 75 is fine if you have future plans for an S/C or Tubro/
 

Euphoric306

New Member
Apr 5, 2004
905
0
0
Dec 9, 2005
#3
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #3
yea, i would think an f-cam is a bit overkill for a stock maf engine as well? i might be mistaken
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Dec 9, 2005
#4
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #4
Another vote for the 65 MM TB.
 

bynummustang

Seen my other Jackstand?
Jul 24, 2005
1
2
69
NC State University
Dec 9, 2005
#5
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #5
My mods are in the sig. and I just put RPM upper and lower on, the car ran sluggish with a 70, went back to the 65 and hauls ass. Broke tires loose in 4th...
 
S

spoolin25psi

New Member
Nov 27, 2005
15
0
0
Dec 9, 2005
#6
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #6
well i learnt alot, i think i will go with 65mm, thanks guys!!! ooh 2 quick questions, how big is a stock throttle body? and what do you think of a b cam instead of the f cam? thanks again
 

bynummustang

Seen my other Jackstand?
Jul 24, 2005
1
2
69
NC State University
Dec 9, 2005
#7
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #7
stock is 60 I think. B cam is decent, I have the stock cam and it still does the job.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Dec 9, 2005
#8
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #8
But is your car SD still? (speed density?) 1987 - 1998 5.0L motors were sent from the factory with an SD system. Changing the cam can cause serious problems unless you use a SD friendly cam or convert to a MAF style system.
 
F

fordguy87

Member
Jul 15, 2005
47
0
6
PA
Dec 9, 2005
#9
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #9
I'm his cousin, he forgot to say that hes converting to mass air in the process of all this.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 9, 2005
#10
  • Dec 9, 2005
  • #10
That 75mm throttle body will be fine if your manifold inlet is 75mm. If its not, you'll need to port match it with a dremel. I switched from a tiny 65mm tb to a 75mm on my old n/a 302 as recommended by my cam grinder (Ed Curtis) Nope, it did NOT hurt my low end.
 

gt40_2003wes

I did sound a wee bit gay there.
Aug 14, 2005
461
2
48
ky
Dec 10, 2005
#11
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #11
go with the 65 unless u plan on some serious future mods.
 
D

Deleted member 87397

Dec 10, 2005
#12
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #12
Do one thing at a time. i.e do the maf conversion before you do anything else and get it running right before you tear it down for the rest of the work. There's nothing worse than doing a bunch of things at once and then having to troubleshoot everything to figure out one glitch. Just my .02
 
O

olong_us

New Member
Jul 21, 2005
3
0
0
Dec 10, 2005
#13
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #13
im also one of spoolin25psi buddies. I want to know if the stock E7 heads can take the lift of the b cam, and if the springs r ok and wont bind. Thanks Alex
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Dec 10, 2005
#14
  • Dec 10, 2005
  • #14
olong_us said:
im also one of spoolin25psi buddies. I want to know if the stock E7 heads can take the lift of the b cam, and if the springs r ok and wont bind. Thanks Alex
Click to expand...

Springs will NEED to be changed. Have the heads clean up milled to ensure they're straight, change the valve seals and look into grinding down the egr bump in the exhaust port.
 

Black-Fifty

New Member
Dec 7, 2005
24
0
0
Dec 11, 2005
#15
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #15
I dont know most people think that the bigger the TB the better performance, trust me you will be more hurting your car than helping it. Just go with a 65, or save some more of you money and get a intake system or full exaust.
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Dec 11, 2005
#16
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #16
I've got a book w/ dyno pulls of several combinations. In it, it has a TB test and bigger is not always better. I think you'd be best suited with a 65mm TB as well unless you plan on going w/ a power adder in the near future.

I've posted those dyno numbers in several other threads of this sort and I can do so in this one as well if you want.
 

gcwh02

New Member
Jun 20, 2005
515
0
0
pottstown, PA
Dec 11, 2005
#17
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #17
srothfuss you mean 1987-88, not 1998 right?
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Dec 11, 2005
#18
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #18
gcwh02 said:
srothfuss you mean 1987-88, not 1998 right?
Click to expand...


Opps, yeah that was a type-o.
 

RDF 01

New Member
Dec 11, 2005
4
0
0
windsor, ont, canada
Dec 11, 2005
#19
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #19
That t.b. would be way too big, you would loose power for sure, I'm running GT-40 intake & heads E/ cam, 73mm maf & complete exhaust on my '88, and I think my 70mm is too big- I felt a noticeable loss in low rpm power. You're better off buying a good MAF, thats the bottleneck.
 

RDF 01

New Member
Dec 11, 2005
4
0
0
windsor, ont, canada
Dec 11, 2005
#20
  • Dec 11, 2005
  • #20
srothfuss said:
Is your car still SD? if so, the cam swap (although not impossilbe) is not recommended. Swapping heads, Intake and exhaust will be OK but the cam will cause vacuum problems.

For a N/A car, 65mm throttle body is probably all you will need. 75 is fine if you have future plans for an S/C or Tubro/
Click to expand...
I can vouch for this first hand, I did the E/cam and GT-40 heads on my 88 SD and the car would not idle at all, ran bad and was a hard start, so I had to change to mass air. You should leave the cam alone and do intake & exhaust- maybe even 1.7 rockers. I've heard of lots of people running very fast w/SD & stock cam, it's a good system, but does'nt like cams. Sorry, I figured you had a mass air car- woops.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
No start
  • dkrupp79
  • May 31, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
178
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2025
dkrupp79
D
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
759
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Resolved Is this something to worry about - things I saw when I removed my upper intake?
  • vferrizz
  • Jul 29, 2023
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 26, 2023
vferrizz
SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?