• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Whats better Long or short headers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jstang209
  • Start date Start date Jul 14, 2004
J

jstang209

20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 3, 2004
640
2
18
Stockton 209
Jul 14, 2004
#1
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #1
i own a 79 5.0 without mods, but im going to put a dual exhasut system and was wondering are shorty headers or long tube headers better for performance and sound
 
M

Matts89LX5.0

Founding Member
Nov 1, 2002
1,314
0
36
Long Island, NY
Jul 14, 2004
#2
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #2
longtubes sound better, don't forget you also need a double hump crossmember to run the dual exhaust on that car.
 
H

hbk_136

New Member
Feb 28, 2004
194
0
0
Southeastern GA
Jul 14, 2004
#3
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #3
Longtubes are better performance-wise. I just ordered a set for myself off the internet. They are better than shorties. Go for em
 
M

Matts89LX5.0

Founding Member
Nov 1, 2002
1,314
0
36
Long Island, NY
Jul 14, 2004
#4
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #4
they actually did a test in 5.0 mag that EL made more hp than LT's i believe
 

slo65

New Member
May 26, 2003
448
0
0
Southern California
Jul 14, 2004
#5
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #5
sorry to hi jack here, but i recently put a 94/95 5.0 in my 88Gt should i be buying the 87-93 headers/lt's or 94-95 ? the cars not running yet i havent sorted out the exhaust
 

Musclecarfan88

Member
Dec 30, 2002
184
0
16
Indianapolis, Indiana
Jul 14, 2004
#6
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #6
Matts89LX5.0 said:
they actually did a test in 5.0 mag that EL made more hp than LT's i believe
Click to expand...


I would like to see the graph on that. See which one made the best midrange, which one had teh broader powerband, which one had the most trq and at what RPM. and then I would like to see them tested at the track to see which one gives you the best performance. That would probably help alot of people in their decision when buying headers.
 

samuraichamploo

Member
Mar 18, 2004
367
0
16
Beaumont, TX
Jul 14, 2004
#7
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #7
long tubes are hell if you work on your car.
try changing your starter with them on.
go shorties. Ive had both
 
S

sidewayzisbest

New Member
Feb 6, 2003
427
0
0
Lexington, SC
Jul 14, 2004
#8
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #8
i go longtubes..........there a pita to install thoght but worth it .....also i would recomend a mini torque starter if you ever plan to buy one in future be a good idea to do it while installing the headers.
 

Qwk88LX

Member
Dec 1, 2003
202
21
19
Sunrise, FL
Jul 14, 2004
#9
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #9
saltymaz said:
long tubes are hell if you work on your car.
try changing your starter with them on.
go shorties. Ive had both
Click to expand...

Yes, they can be a pia & I know firsthand about the starter problem..if I'd have known I'd definitely have installed the mini starter when I put them on. But with that said, they're definitely worth it, there's nothing like the sound of a good exhaust with some longtubes
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 14, 2004
#10
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #10
saltymaz said:
long tubes are hell if you work on your car.
try changing your starter with them on.
go shorties. Ive had both
Click to expand...

No pain, no gain. They are worth the extra work. The starter wasn't so bad, a socket on a long extension on the lower and a short ratchet wrench on the upper bolt, no problem. Made the clutch install a little more difficult but oh well. Installing the longtubes once everything was out of the way and the engine was jacked up some was no big deal. I haven't found one thing on a foxbody that was difficult.
 

bmo37

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2001
2,368
2
46
New Jersey
Jul 14, 2004
#11
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #11
Musclecarfan88 said:
I would like to see the graph on that. See which one made the best midrange, which one had teh broader powerband, which one had the most trq and at what RPM. and then I would like to see them tested at the track to see which one gives you the best performance. That would probably help alot of people in their decision when buying headers.
Click to expand...

I remeber reading that also, I've had lt's, shorties and equal lengths and if I had to choose again the winner would be hands down unequal length shorties, simply for the easy of installation, spark plug clearance, and you won't burn wires. I do reccomend getting a ceramic coating on whatever headers you choose.

I remeber other tests besides these but the shorties actually have better midrange, and after the 5250rpm the shorties do actually better than the lt's which drastically drop off. Where do you mostly shift early in the powerband or later?

 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jul 14, 2004
#12
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #12
Well, different test have different curves, maby that has to do with the rest of the engine or something but they all come conclusive that LT's overall better.
 

Icepick

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
378
0
0
Ft Lauderdale
Jul 14, 2004
#13
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #13
On most motors LT's are the way to go, but for the little extra power between 4-5k you would gain i'll just stick with the cheaper, easier shorties.
 

JaysGreenLX

Founding Member
Oct 8, 2000
2,252
0
0
Buffalo, NY
Jul 14, 2004
#14
  • Jul 14, 2004
  • #14
On a mostly stock motor you really don't need anything more than shorties.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

W
Dipstick
  • wccurtis1963
  • Jun 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
146
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
Willybill32
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
C
Exhaust 4 Cats required for smog in California?
  • Codosuarus
  • Sep 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
952
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2025
Scottyding73
S
J
Engine Running like crap :(
  • justadude07
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
323
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 19, 2025
DadLife0724
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
698
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?