• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

What's the fastest 1/4 time run by a stock 99-04 GT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter georgio440
  • Start date Start date Dec 3, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

georgio440

Member
Nov 22, 2007
195
0
17
Walnut Creek, CA
Dec 3, 2007
#1
  • Dec 3, 2007
  • #1
Topic^
 

the98stang

Active Member
Aug 12, 2005
2,408
0
47
Clovis, CA
Dec 3, 2007
#2
  • Dec 3, 2007
  • #2
prolly mid to high 13's
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 3, 2007
#3
  • Dec 3, 2007
  • #3
I heard of a stock 03 mustang gt 5 speed run 13.5 (Winters98GT 1/4 list in the forum) with one hell of a driver most likely.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Dec 3, 2007
#4
  • Dec 3, 2007
  • #4
I think Evan Smith got a mid 13's back when the 99 first came out..but he can drive


high 13's to low 14's is the norm, but i've seen plenty in the mod to high 14's stock too
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Dec 3, 2007
#5
  • Dec 3, 2007
  • #5
13.33, bullitt, full race weight with drag radials. somebody said that a 13.6 was on my list, though the et list is not my list, but a buddies, bill putnam that has been keeping track for years. The DA, or density altitude, and driver are key. Most trap in the 97-101 range, so that is what I would look at more than ET.
 
J

JayC

Founding Member
Jul 11, 2000
674
0
17
Southern Indiana
Dec 3, 2007
#6
  • Dec 3, 2007
  • #6
Back in 2002 my 01 GT ran 13.45@102 at Beech Bend Raceway on a nice 50* day. The ONLY MODS were drop-in K&N , no silencer, MAC O/R X with welded in Flowmasters and a UPR shifter, trunk was emptied and 1/4 tank gas. A decent 2.02 60' on the stock Gatorbacks. Now that's not totally off the showroom stock, but pretty close.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 3, 2007
#7
  • Dec 3, 2007
  • #7
Winters98GT said:
13.33, bullitt, full race weight with drag radials. somebody said that a 13.6 was on my list, though the et list is not my list, but a buddies, bill putnam that has been keeping track for years. The DA, or density altitude, and driver are key. Most trap in the 97-101 range, so that is what I would look at more than ET.
Click to expand...

Thanks for clearing that up man. I thought I saw a 13.5 1/4 time with a stock 03 5-speed on his list. Must of had DR's and perfect race conditions(plus his driving skills) As for Bill Putnam
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Dec 3, 2007
#8
  • Dec 3, 2007
  • #8
fobra559 said:
Thanks for clearing that up man. I thought I saw a 13.5 1/4 time with a stock 03 5-speed on his list. Must of had DR's and perfect race conditions(plus his driving skills) As for Bill Putnam
Click to expand...

no problem man! Im really not sure about all of the times, I can only comment on the times Ive updated. However, if they are on the list, than its proboly true. That list is only updated by Bill or one other guy at the "other site" and they are pretty strick on people whose times are questionable. Chances are you may know more about that run than I do. If you have anymore info on the run, let us know
 

georgio440

Member
Nov 22, 2007
195
0
17
Walnut Creek, CA
Dec 3, 2007
#9
  • Dec 3, 2007
  • #9
Lol, these morons on the IGN Cars Lobby are trying to say that a Civic Si will hang with a GT, and that the 2002 Accord V6 is faster than a Mustang GT in both 0-60 and in the 1/4 mile.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 3, 2007
#10
  • Dec 3, 2007
  • #10
Winters98GT said:
no problem man! Im really not sure about all of the times, I can only comment on the times Ive updated. However, if they are on the list, than its proboly true. That list is only updated by Bill or one other guy at the "other site" and they are pretty strick on people whose times are questionable. Chances are you may know more about that run than I do. If you have anymore info on the run, let us know
Click to expand...

Yeah, I was shocked with the 13.5 1/4 time being that the guy said it was stock but who knows Yeah, but if I hear anything more about that, I will let you guys know for sure
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 3, 2007
#11
  • Dec 3, 2007
  • #11
georgio440 said:
Lol, these morons on the IGN Cars Lobby are trying to say that a Civic Si will hang with a GT, and that the 2002 Accord V6 is faster than a Mustang GT in both 0-60 and in the 1/4 mile.
Click to expand...

Weird, I saw two stock Civic SI run very high 14's and low 15's at my local race track this summer and other stock mustangs were running mid to low 14's. The weather sucked that day It depends on the driver I'm guessing.
 

fudleyd

New Member
Jan 10, 2003
180
0
0
Littleton, CO
Dec 4, 2007
#12
  • Dec 4, 2007
  • #12
Mustang5L5 said:
I think Evan Smith got a mid 13's back when the 99 first came out..but he can drive


high 13's to low 14's is the norm, but i've seen plenty in the mod to high 14's stock too
Click to expand...

I think you are right--if memory serves me he removed the spare/jack and front swaybar and got about a 13.6.
 

Jackie Chan

I didn't read this.
Founding Member
Oct 17, 2002
2,507
4
48
Orlando, FL
Dec 4, 2007
#13
  • Dec 4, 2007
  • #13
i'd love to get ahold of a stock 99-04 gt and take it to the track, im sure i could click off a 13.6 or better
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Dec 4, 2007
#14
  • Dec 4, 2007
  • #14
Jackie Chan said:
i'd love to get ahold of a stock 99-04 gt and take it to the track, im sure i could click off a 13.6 or better
Click to expand...

reverse burnouts ftw
 
J

justinschmidt1

Member
Jun 15, 2005
349
0
16
Dec 4, 2007
#15
  • Dec 4, 2007
  • #15
georgio440 said:
Lol, these morons on the IGN Cars Lobby are trying to say that a Civic Si will hang with a GT, and that the 2002 Accord V6 is faster than a Mustang GT in both 0-60 and in the 1/4 mile.
Click to expand...

Thats cause theyre probably all little dbag ricers that dont know anything but what thier other dbag ricer friends with hondas say..

I had some kid try to say he could beat me in his moms si...I told him straight up id murder him. He hasnt raced me.

The accord 6 speed coupe v6 can run a mid 14...can keep up with an auto gt with a bad driver I guess?

The v6 auto accord coupe is slower...more like high 14, the 4 door v6 runs like high 15s.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 4, 2007
#16
  • Dec 4, 2007
  • #16
justinschmidt1 said:
Thats cause theyre probably all little dbag ricers that dont know anything but what thier other dbag ricer friends with hondas say..

I had some kid try to say he could beat me in his moms si...I told him straight up id murder him. He hasnt raced me.

The accord 6 speed coupe v6 can run a mid 14...can keep up with an auto gt with a bad driver I guess?

The v6 auto accord coupe is slower...more like high 14, the 4 door v6 runs like high 15s.
Click to expand...

What year of the auto GT's are you referring to? 96-98? or 99-04?
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,265
17,952
224
Massachusetts
Dec 4, 2007
#17
  • Dec 4, 2007
  • #17
justinschmidt1 said:
The accord 6 speed coupe v6 can run a mid 14...can keep up with an auto gt with a bad driver I guess?
Click to expand...


I've run 14.1 in my GT bone stock. I'm not a great driver, but i'm not a crappy driver either.


Still, the same day i ran the 14.1 bone stock, i also ran a pair of 14.6's. They weren't even bad runs, maybe a shift was a little early or i bogged a bit off the line or slipped the clutch too much.


My point is that a mid 14 second accord is only one mistake away from hanging with a stock 5-spd GT. Every time you race, you can't assume since you ran a 14.0 previously, that every run will be a 14.0. Sometimes.....you screw up.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 4, 2007
#18
  • Dec 4, 2007
  • #18
Mustang5L5 said:
I've run 14.1 in my GT bone stock. I'm not a great driver, but i'm not a crappy driver either.


Still, the same day i ran the 14.1 bone stock, i also ran a pair of 14.6's. They weren't even bad runs, maybe a shift was a little early or i bogged a bit off the line or slipped the clutch too much.


My point is that a mid 14 second accord is only one mistake away from hanging with a stock 5-spd GT. Every time you race, you can't assume since you ran a 14.0 previously, that every run will be a 14.0. Sometimes.....you screw up.
Click to expand...

That's a very nice run with 14.1 stock man
 

98V6 K.I.T.T.

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2001
2,049
0
46
Everett, Washington
Dec 5, 2007
#19
  • Dec 5, 2007
  • #19
fobra559 said:
Weird, I saw two stock Civic SI run very high 14's and low 15's at my local race track this summer and other stock mustangs were running mid to low 14's. The weather sucked that day It depends on the driver I'm guessing.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure about the current SI, if I'm right it should be the K20a motor found on the RSX-Type S, which if tha'ts the case they run around the 15.0 mark give or take a couple seconds. An older SI used the same motor as the base RSX which was around the 160hp mark. A V6 accord ON THE TRACK will not beat a 99+ mustang with equal drivers.
 

fobra559

At least it's more erect and not floppy anymore.
Nov 1, 2007
721
0
0
Lindsay, CA
Dec 5, 2007
#20
  • Dec 5, 2007
  • #20
98V6 K.I.T.T. said:
I'm not sure about the current SI, if I'm right it should be the K20a motor found on the RSX-Type S, which if tha'ts the case they run around the 15.0 mark give or take a couple seconds. An older SI used the same motor as the base RSX which was around the 160hp mark. A V6 accord ON THE TRACK will not beat a 99+ mustang with equal drivers.
Click to expand...

That's what I was thinking, it would be closer with the older 96-98GT's (stock for stock)
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Chasing Vacuum leak 99 GT
  • EBNS_2005
  • May 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
175
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 3, 2026
X-cam34
X
I
98 Mustang GT dying
  • ItsMason
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
139
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 25, 2026
lenzgt
L
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
950
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
S
Car shakes when taking off help???
  • STANKYstangs
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
345
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 27, 2026
LILCBRA
A
Engine 04 GT timing chain issue
  • AwesomeX1103
  • Sep 3, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
396
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Nov 5, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?