• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Whats the most economical way to make 400 hp, 302 or 351

  • Thread starter Thread starter sdstanger
  • Start date Start date Feb 4, 2009
S

sdstanger

New Member
Dec 7, 2003
15
0
2
Feb 4, 2009
#1
  • Feb 4, 2009
  • #1
I need an opinion on which way to go. I've got an 89 5.0 Lx 5 speed with 150,000 miles on it. Currently has smog delete, pulleys, US made Cobra intake, off road h pipe and BBk equal length headers.

I've got an oppurtunity to pick up a 1996 5.8 from an F250 that runs very well and has about 125,000 miles on it. Compression check shows very equal cylinders with an average of 155 psi, warm, oil pressure 55 psi at 1500 to 2000 rpm.

Wondering which engine will get me to 400 hp with the least amount of cash. Obviously there will be some expense for swap parts if I go with the 351, but I've already got the oil pan.

The 351 should be a roller lifter block, correct?
 
D

DrMaxit

Founding Member
Nov 4, 2002
139
0
16
41
Augsta GA
Feb 4, 2009
#2
  • Feb 4, 2009
  • #2
Tagged to see results.
 
S

sdstanger

New Member
Dec 7, 2003
15
0
2
Feb 5, 2009
#3
  • Feb 5, 2009
  • #3
Anybody ??
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
46
Northern KY
Feb 5, 2009
#4
  • Feb 5, 2009
  • #4
A '96 5.8 should be a roller.

Do you want 400hp at the crank, or at the wheels? There's a big difference there. 400hp at the crank is easier to get than at the wheels...obviously. You can throw a well match h/c/i on a stock 302 and get really close to 400hp at the crank, whereas it'll probably take a stroker to make 400hp at the wheels. The difference in 5.0 vs. 5.8 is gonna be how far you can go with it, since the 5.8 can be stroked up to a 426, and stroker kits and block machining pretty much cost the same so do you wanna spend X amount of money on a 347 or that same or close to the same money on a 400+ci engine? Keep in mind that you may need to spend extra cash for the 351 swap parts, but IMO that's the way to go if you want that power...as i've seen well built h/c/i 408's make 500hp easy.
 

Strippt88

New Member
Nov 24, 2006
81
0
0
Cedar Lake, Indiana
Feb 5, 2009
#5
  • Feb 5, 2009
  • #5
Most economical, period? You have a good motor. Install a 150 shot on it, few hundred bucks. My 89 motored 86 went 11.40's with an unopened(not even a valve cover came off) 5.0 with a 150 NOS kit(and a bunch of chassis work/practice). I would recommend rebuilding it anyhow, its old, but you won't necessarily get more power from a bigger motor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
Stangnet Newbie: Horsepower/torque Estimate For My 1983 Gt
  • EBW83
  • Jan 19, 2018
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 22, 2018
stanglx2002
B
5.0 Ho 302 To 347 Stroker Rebuilt (jeep) - Seems Like I've Lost Power
  • bwall
  • Jul 13, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2017
jrichker
J
  • Locked
Stunning 1972 Mustang convertible to sell or trade
  • J.R..Sunshine
  • Dec 6, 2010
  • Classic Mustangs For Sale
Replies
0
Views
3K
Classic Mustangs For Sale Dec 6, 2010
J.R..Sunshine
J
R
  • Locked
94 Canary Yellow GT, Supercharged, Heads, Intake, Built Rear, 400 hp, $6,000
  • rwoodyer
  • Nov 27, 2010
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
2
Views
2K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Nov 27, 2010
rwoodyer
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?