• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Which exhaust pipe to choose?

  • Thread starter Thread starter amplifier28
  • Start date Start date May 21, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

amplifier28

Member
Apr 16, 2005
222
1
19
May 21, 2006
#1
  • May 21, 2006
  • #1
I have a 1988 Mustang GT hatchback with an automatic transmission. I want a deep rumble but not necessary a very loud exhaust. I will purchase a Flowmaster 2-chamber American Thunder cat-back exhaust. My question is which will be better, an X-pipe or an H-pipe. What are the pros and cons to each? I do not need to pass emissions and catylytic converters are optional. I heard that the converters give you more torque. Is that true?
 

Nopantz

New Member
May 26, 2003
234
0
0
NJ/US Merchant Marine Academy
May 21, 2006
#2
  • May 21, 2006
  • #2
this is one of those questions where people will tell u too use the search function....but i wont be a mean lol......anyways if ur going with a Flowmaster Exhaust and you want that real deep muscle car rumble go with an H-Pipe, an X-Pipe wont be as deep. Now I'm not 100% sure about the whole you loose torque when u delete you cats but if you do get rid of your cats it will be loud, especially when you really get on it.

I went with the Summit H-Pipe which is really inexpensive but requried alittle work to make it fit right.
 

amplifier28

Member
Apr 16, 2005
222
1
19
May 27, 2006
#3
  • May 27, 2006
  • #3
Anymore suggestions?
 

Skoobie

Damn...Tyler65's hot!
May 25, 2003
655
0
17
Vancouver, WA
May 27, 2006
#4
  • May 27, 2006
  • #4
Supposedly the X produces more power, but there was a thread a few days ago about a guy who thought the bbk-X o/r mixed with the american thunder sounded like crap. Something about sounding like the exhaust was being pushed through a coke can? I have an o/r H and it sounds great.
 
U

uneverkno

New Member
Aug 18, 2005
65
0
0
May 28, 2006
#5
  • May 28, 2006
  • #5
heres a vid of my setup its mac shorties and h-pipe with 40 series flows
http://media.putfile.com/93-Mustang-GT
 

feifong

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
319
0
0
mesa
May 28, 2006
#6
  • May 28, 2006
  • #6
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=638956

whatever you pick h and x are different sounds
 
B

brandonshady

New Member
May 27, 2006
31
0
0
DALLAS< TX
May 28, 2006
#7
  • May 28, 2006
  • #7
I used to run BBK equal length shorty's, no cat's, O/R H-pipe, Flows, with normal size chrome tips... As stated above it will idle & have low rumble at low speeds, not as tingy the video clip (may be the cam). However, when you get on it... people MOVE !!!!

I bought into the whole X-pipe give more power & ended up changing my tips to fat mouths for rumble. My personal opinion is the X-pipe causes more air flow to muff's & flowmasters do not sound good on the X-pipe. I am going to change mine back to the H-pipe.
 

amplifier28

Member
Apr 16, 2005
222
1
19
Jun 14, 2006
#8
  • Jun 14, 2006
  • #8
Anymore suggestions? Comments?
 

myslo50

Member
Jun 12, 2006
247
3
18
ohio
Jun 14, 2006
#9
  • Jun 14, 2006
  • #9
i have bbk equal lenth shorties with a mac prochamber and 2.5 mac flowpaths with dumps. has a nice grunt when u nail it and is not loud goung down the e-way. but its not loud enough for me, i should of went with 3" dumps. plus mac has a sound of its own real nice
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Jun 14, 2006
#10
  • Jun 14, 2006
  • #10
Get an H if you want a lower tone or deeper tone

The X usually takes the sound frequency up a touch and makes for a slightly higher pitch exhaust note.

That being said, you can not go wrong with a set of shorties, Off Road H-pipe and some 40 series flowmasters. It's the classic Fox Mustang sound.

Edit: type-o
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jun 14, 2006
#11
  • Jun 14, 2006
  • #11
Get a cat'd h-pipe. you will eliminate the drone flowmasters is famous for at 2000rpm. it will sound good.
 

amplifier28

Member
Apr 16, 2005
222
1
19
Jun 16, 2006
#12
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #12
Anymore suggestions? Comments?
 
F

foxstang9050

New Member
Aug 23, 2005
158
0
0
El Doarado Hills, CA
Jun 16, 2006
#13
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #13
I run BBK Shorty unequal headers, Bassani o/r x-pipe, and flowmasters... used to have a BBK h-pipe... and ill never go back to that after the x pipe... different from everybody elses opinion... but i noticed a much deeper aggressive tone at idle with my xpipe... and when u get on it its unquestionably better... 2000 rpm makes the greatest noise ive heard, and when winding down from high rpms... it makes me wanna spendin a whole day driving down hills in San Francisco.... I know this is the exact opposite from everybody else... but i much prefer the x... dont buy into the power difference though
 
B

BOWTIEKILLR

New Member
Nov 26, 2005
100
0
0
Jun 16, 2006
#14
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #14
shortys, o/r h and flow 40s here. car is nice and deep, with just enough rumble and enough scream when i jump on it. cats usually make the exhaust much quieter, and as far as torque...its barely enough to notice. i prefer the sound of catless h because its a nice clean rumble. the x has more of a scream to it, and is more raspy higher in the rpms. if you want the deep rumble without the volume of 40s then look into bassani. they rumble nicely but arent too loud.
 

Jaswir

Member
Mar 31, 2005
578
0
18
Orlando, FL
Jun 16, 2006
#15
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #15
i would get a x/pipe... if your looking for performance,,,, i had a off road H and then went to a off road X and it droped .3ths in the 1/4 and 3mph increase... with nothing else changed and with about the same 60ft...

thats what happened with mine... and im a Auto too...
 

hollywoodstang

Active Member
May 23, 2006
1,095
2
36
Jun 16, 2006
#16
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #16
GET A H-PIPE!!! SOUNDS WAY BETTER!!! i know because i bought both and tested out. i am really good at double buying parts just get h pipe
 

amplifier28

Member
Apr 16, 2005
222
1
19
Jun 16, 2006
#17
  • Jun 16, 2006
  • #17
Anymore comments? Suggestions?
 

amplifier28

Member
Apr 16, 2005
222
1
19
Jun 23, 2006
#18
  • Jun 23, 2006
  • #18
Anymore comments? Suggestions?
 
D

dwhiskie

New Member
Sep 18, 2004
183
0
0
Jun 23, 2006
#19
  • Jun 23, 2006
  • #19
I think its mostly personal preference. Ive had both with several different catbacks and my preference is an O/R X.
 

amplifier28

Member
Apr 16, 2005
222
1
19
Jun 25, 2006
#20
  • Jun 25, 2006
  • #20
Anymore comments? Suggestions?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
455
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
E
For Sale 1991 Ford Mustang GT Convertible for sale
  • ejregenfuss
  • Oct 1, 2023
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 1, 2023
ejregenfuss
E
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Exhaust recommendations to save my poor aging ears.
  • CWBx
  • Sep 3, 2021
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 30, 2021
96stangfl
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?