• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

which heads to get.....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quick95GT
  • Start date Start date Feb 23, 2004

Quick95GT

New Member
Nov 23, 2003
69
0
0
St. Louis, Mo
Feb 23, 2004
#1
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #1
im caught in a bind, well kinda.....i dont know what heads to get. im looking at the afr 165 60 cc pedistals, the edlebrock performer rpm, and the trick flow twisted wedge heads. im just wondering what will give me the best bang for the buck as well as the most power. thanks guys.
 

S/CBlack95GT

New Member
Apr 6, 2003
2,018
0
0
Tampa Palms, FL
Feb 23, 2004
#2
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #2
I think the redesigned Edels are the best bang for the buck. I have the old Edels but they are still great and have been trouble free for the 4,000 miles I have owned them. I also only paid $980 for them 3 years ago.
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Feb 23, 2004
#3
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #3
Most people on here agree that the AFR's are the best of what you listed. But I just ordered a set of Twisted Wedge heads for $939 for Summit, thats $300 cheaper then AFR's. I'd say thats a pretty good bang for the buck. The sale at Summit ends next Wednesday (February sale) so if you're interested you don't have too much time.
 

194stang

New Member
Aug 11, 2003
148
0
0
Feb 23, 2004
#4
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #4
yup is a good price....but womt he have to get different pushrods and rocker arms for the stud mount?
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Feb 23, 2004
#5
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #5
Yeah, you're right he'd need new rockers. I don't think Trick Flow's come in pedestal mount do they?
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Feb 23, 2004
#6
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #6
Why are you thinking about pedestal mount heads? For the money you can't beat Trick Flows. For the best you can't beat AFR's

Jake
 

Quick95GT

New Member
Nov 23, 2003
69
0
0
St. Louis, Mo
Feb 23, 2004
#7
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #7
i have a set of 1.7 roller rockers pedistal mount. would those work? also would i need anything else? another thing what are the specs on those heads.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
J
Engine Running like crap :(
  • justadude07
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
310
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 19, 2025
DadLife0724
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
164
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
692
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
415
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?