• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Which Mustang Would You Choose?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eploy
  • Start date Start date Oct 22, 2006
E

eploy

New Member
Oct 21, 2006
0
0
0
Oct 22, 2006
#1
  • Oct 22, 2006
  • #1
Hello Everyone,

My name is Edward and I am new to your forum.

I am interested in purchasing one of two Mustangs but only have two choices:

1. 1965 Mustang Coupe with 6 cylinder in-line engine
2. 1973 Mustang Mach I with 351 V-8 engine

The reason my choice is limited is because I currently live in Thailand and vintage Mustangs are extremely rare. Both cars are selling for just over USD10,000 and are in good mechanical condition (verified by my uncle who is an engineer/mechanic) with original engine blocks, etc.

From a collector standpoint, which is more desirable?

Regards,

Edward
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Oct 22, 2006
#2
  • Oct 22, 2006
  • #2
the mach 1 is the better collector car in this case as it is a desirable model, where as the six powered car is usually overlooked. i think my choice in this case would be the mach 1.
 
8

85 Turbo Bird

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2002
77
0
0
Sacramento, CA
Oct 22, 2006
#3
  • Oct 22, 2006
  • #3
if you just want to collect it, then the Mach is the way to go.
 
B

blue65coupe

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
71
0
0
North Carolina
Oct 22, 2006
#4
  • Oct 22, 2006
  • #4
Collector standpoint...mach 1.
Good luck
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Oct 22, 2006
#5
  • Oct 22, 2006
  • #5
for a collector car, the mach, though I would go with the old inline six just because I like 65s better
 

Henceforward

The Avatar Master
Founding Member
Jul 17, 2001
485
0
0
Oct 22, 2006
#6
  • Oct 22, 2006
  • #6
I would go for the '65

 

Attachments

  • 1266.webp
    93.5 KB · Views: 149
E

eploy

New Member
Oct 21, 2006
0
0
0
Oct 22, 2006
#7
  • Oct 22, 2006
  • #7
Thanks People,

You guys are awesome! My own feeling is to go with the Mach I. I like the classic lines on the 1965 coupe better, but a 351 V-8 Cleveland engine even if it's from the sleeper year of 1973 is hard to pass up vis-a-vis a 6 cylinder in-line (I am a power junkie). There is one other Mustang in Thailand that I really like: a jet black 1967 fastback with V-8 engine. Sadly, this car is not for sale "at any price".

Regards,

Edward
 

BDT 1967

Member
Jan 31, 2006
91
0
6
Wichita KS
Oct 23, 2006
#8
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • #8
was eleanor a 72 or a 73? I would also go with the mach.
 

stangkid88

New Member
Nov 11, 2005
112
0
0
Seattle area
Oct 23, 2006
#9
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • #9
Like everyone else said, body wise I would go with the '65 because it is my favorite year and that's what I think of when I think classic stang, but it has an inline 6.

The Mach 1 may not be as desirable body, but the fact that it is a Mach 1 is much more collectable and the V8 will be a lot more fun to drive. Looks like you made a good decision, let us know when you make a deal and of course we want to see pics. I feel cool driving a classic stang here, even with about 10 I know in my city, it must be really special for you to drive out in Thailand. Enjoy the car!
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Oct 23, 2006
#10
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • #10
BDT 1967 said:
was eleanor a 72 or a 73? I would also go with the mach.
Click to expand...

67
 

BDT 1967

Member
Jan 31, 2006
91
0
6
Wichita KS
Oct 23, 2006
#11
  • Oct 23, 2006
  • #11
65fastback2+2 said:
67
Click to expand...

No the original gone in 60. I think it was actualy a 72
 
J

James Kirk

New Member
Jun 3, 2005
44
0
0
Oct 24, 2006
#12
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #12
'73. Adrian Pace has a line in the movie where he first sees the yellow
Mustang and says there she is, the last of the Mustangs. I guess he was
insinuating that the Mustang II is no Mustang.
 
G

Gud T.B. Blown

Member
Dec 9, 2004
583
1
18
Oct 24, 2006
#13
  • Oct 24, 2006
  • #13
James Kirk said:
'73. Adrian Pace has a line in the movie where he first sees the yellow
Mustang and says there she is, the last of the Mustangs. I guess he was
insinuating that the Mustang II is no Mustang.
Click to expand...

The original Eleanor was a '72 dressed up as a '73. It was also originally a 4 speed car.
As for me, I'd go for the '73 Mach. I find it difficult to get excited about a '65 six cylinder coupe. Now if it were a fastback, that would be another story.
 
E

electricgreen

Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,140
0
36
Western NY
Oct 30, 2006
#14
  • Oct 30, 2006
  • #14
Eleanor was a 71 made to look like a 73, not a 72. I have an article published in 1989 that was written before Halicki died filming gone II that has more info. He specifically sought out that car to buy for the leading role as Eleanor.

I'd go for the Mach.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Mustang mk6 v6 strange leak
  • reme24
  • Mar 18, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
1
Views
255
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Mar 26, 2025
89ripper
R
Hello! Just Got here & Just bought a 1964.5/1965 Mustang ...
  • RMneanCA
  • May 29, 2024
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
782
The Welcome Wagon Jun 2, 2024
RMneanCA
R
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Thursday at 9:44 PM
Noobz347
2001 Mustang GT -- Valve Assembly Pressure Regulator Solution Found!
  • SN95_fanx54
  • Aug 17, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
3K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 23, 2025
Noobz347
P
Thunderbird Rear End on a 1968 Mustang
  • phosphene
  • Dec 7, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2022
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?