• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Which Procharger?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wgpaintballer
  • Start date Start date Nov 9, 2006
W

wgpaintballer

New Member
Oct 7, 2005
49
0
0
Nov 9, 2006
#1
  • Nov 9, 2006
  • #1
Hey whats up? I have been looking into sc's and im leaning towards the procharger because of the air to air intercooler.. My question is should i go with the P1SC or the D1SC it will be on a mild 306 looking for 400's hp.. also what kind of boost should i expect on a 9 rib or a 12 rib.. thank you
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Nov 9, 2006
#2
  • Nov 9, 2006
  • #2
If I was to get a procharger I would never use the P1SC, the impeller is a very poor design, the D1SC is good though. If this is a car you drive alot you may want to look into getting a vortech, that way when you change your engine oil your also changing the supercharger oil, with the procharger you have to change its oil separately every 5000 miles, the vortech also has a better water cooled intercooler.
 

FastGT50Stang

New Member
Sep 19, 2005
50
0
0
Chicago
Nov 9, 2006
#3
  • Nov 9, 2006
  • #3
795.0pacecar said:
If I was to get a procharger I would never use the P1SC, the impeller is a very poor design, the D1SC is good though. If this is a car you drive alot you may want to look into getting a vortech, that way when you change your engine oil your also changing the supercharger oil, with the procharger you have to change its oil separately every 5000 miles, the vortech also has a better water cooled intercooler.
Click to expand...

Except for the Procharger P600B model, which is not a self-contained s/c, and involves tapping into the oil pan, even though some procharger models do have the straight impeller design like the p600b and d1sc, which are not the most efficient, but still are very good s/c'ers don't get me wrong, i have one on the way, and although i really don't think that the D-1SC is the s/c you want if your only looking for around 400 horses...

Stan
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Nov 9, 2006
#4
  • Nov 9, 2006
  • #4
There is also the P1SC-1 that has curved impellers, if your dead set on procharger then thats the one you want. I like most prochargers, I've just read a lot of bad things about the lower models.

The D1SC doesn't have straight vanes, the P600B and P1SC do.
 

onefstsnake

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
792
1
0
Northern VA
Nov 10, 2006
#5
  • Nov 10, 2006
  • #5
Go with an F1R.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Nov 10, 2006
#6
  • Nov 10, 2006
  • #6
795.0pacecar said:
the vortech also has a better water cooled intercooler.
Click to expand...


The Vortech "Aftercooler" is not near as efficent as the A/A that ATI has...


My $.02

Personally I have not had any issues with the P1SC, but they do make a few different models. The D series blower is very nice and it has a totally different design. Depending on your set-up the D-series blower will make about 8-10psi out of the box but really to get into the efficency of the blower they need a little more blower rpm.

I am partial to the F1R as well I have one.
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Nov 10, 2006
#7
  • Nov 10, 2006
  • #7
Rick 91GT said:
The Vortech "Aftercooler" is not near as efficent as the A/A that ATI has...


My $.02
Click to expand...

How do you figure? Not only is there more boost lost through all the plumbing, water to air is more efficient than air to air, you also cant put ice water in an air to air intercooler.
 

-86GTStang

Member
Dec 27, 2003
165
0
16
Norway, Scandinavia
Nov 10, 2006
#8
  • Nov 10, 2006
  • #8
795.0pacecar said:
How do you figure? Not only is there more boost lost through all the plumbing, water to air is more efficient than air to air, you also cant put ice water in an air to air intercooler.
Click to expand...
Boost lost ?, its not like 10psi after 10 sec of boost.. If everything is like good connected, nothing else than cooled down air pressure would knock at the trotlebodys door ? All that plumbing, just cool down the compressed air. Think about the speed of the compressed air, travelling true the intercooler.And, why do some of the racecars send the turbo or blown air true an intercooler in the trunk etc. ?
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Nov 10, 2006
#9
  • Nov 10, 2006
  • #9
795.0pacecar said:
How do you figure? Not only is there more boost lost through all the plumbing, water to air is more efficient than air to air, you also cant put ice water in an air to air intercooler.
Click to expand...


That's great for the track but worthless for the street. Ait to water cooler get heat saturated. Votech's kit is especially susseptible to this because for some reason, they decided to put the holding tank UNDER THE HOOD. Brilliant! not

Air to air is best for a street app. No heat soak, larger exchanger (typically). Not sure where you got the idea that there was more restriction with air to air vs. water to air either. Procharger kits come out of the driver side, straight through the exchanger and into the pass side to the intake. The Vortech kit enters and exits the same side with many more hard bends in the plumbing and smaller exchanger to squeeze through.

As far as the oiling goes... I consider keeping contaminated engine oil out of my blower a plus. Change it every other oil change... it takes 10 minutes tops.
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Nov 10, 2006
#10
  • Nov 10, 2006
  • #10
I read that the blower has to put out a little more boost out at the outlet to keep the boost up in the pipes since they are so long or something like that. The vortech's water runs though its own fairly large heat exchanger in the front of the car, so I dont see how the water could just get heat soaked more than a big block of aluminum up against the radiator and pipes running through the engine bay. The water is constantly being pumped through the system and through the heat exchanger.
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Nov 11, 2006
#11
  • Nov 11, 2006
  • #11
BTW Im not claiming to be an expert on this matter by any means, I just read a lot of stuff that may or may not be vortech propaganda that seems to make a lot of sense, If Im wrong do you guys know of any good counter test results that are in favor of the prochargers? What I read was where vortech tested the P1SC up against their base kit.

Oh btw, filtered engine oil isn't good enough for the supercharger, but its good enough for your very expensive engine?
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Nov 11, 2006
#12
  • Nov 11, 2006
  • #12
795.0pacecar said:
Oh btw, filtered engine oil isn't good enough for the supercharger, but its good enough for your very expensive engine?
Click to expand...

The clearances in an engine are considerably larger than that of a supercharger. What's more, imagine for a moment that you loose an engine bearing or simpler still, a head gasket and get water mixed with the oil. Not only have you just lost a motor but chances are you've just lost the blower too.

Having drained vast quantities of engine oil in my life and probably a 50 gallon drum's worth of self-contained blower oil... I can tell you with 100% certainty that the blower oil comes out looking like it did when it entered (usually looks as clean as it did when it went in) vs. engine oil that's black with contaminates or at least considerably darker than it was.

Granted, these are all catastrophic failures and folks have been running oil lines tapped into the pan successfully for years however... had I the option with any kind of blower... I'd prefer the blower oil to stay isolated from engine oil.


Heat soak is a real issue. It shouldn't be too difficult to dig up an article or two on it. Any time you use liquid in a cooling system, you get it. Both types of systems use a heat exchanger that's parked in front of or in the rear of the radiator. Some even use horizontally mounted exchangers that run behind and down from the radiator in the low pressure area (still pulling radiator air though the coils). The warmer the water in reservoir gets (in this case the reservoir is in the engine bay) the less efficient the air to water inter/after cooler gets. Air to air, on the other hand. Does not get heat soaked. It's always close to the same temp as the ambient air. If it has a 30* differential on a 70* day then that differential would actually be a bit smaller on a 90* day (the actual variance differs between size and style).

The point is that though air to air coolers are not the last word in inter-cooling, do seem to perform best and more consistently on a daily driven street vehicle.

For a track or mostly track vehicle... Sure... I'd take air to water hands down. A nice ice/salt slurry would drop inlet temps down to nothing!
 

onefstsnake

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
792
1
0
Northern VA
Nov 11, 2006
#13
  • Nov 11, 2006
  • #13
A good friend of mine runs a D1SC Procharger with a slightly larger A/A IC.
He also runs the Renegade Blower brackets.

He is currently running ~ 20psi, and putting down right at 700rwhp/rwtq.
This is in a Sportsman 347.
He has ran a best of 10.18 @ 136mph (which was on 14psi)

a few vids
Race: http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b130/onefstsnake2/?action=view&current=PureComp-1.flv

Dyno:http://media.putfile.com/PUREVIL-on-the-Dyno
 

KasperG

New Member
May 20, 2005
38
0
0
Jul 19, 2008
#14
  • Jul 19, 2008
  • #14
The self contained oil serves more than one purpose. Lower supercharger head unit temps. If you ever break the engine or the head unit, you will not have to worry about cross contaminating with shavings ect.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
For Sale 1987-1993 (Foxbody) Procharger D1SC Supercharger Kit
  • 89Daley
  • Aug 3, 2025
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
2
Views
383
Engine and Power Adder Oct 12, 2025
1fas89ssp
1
K
Procharger Stage 2 - 2013 Mustang GT Minor Hiccups
  • KHills5058
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
118
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Oct 9, 2025
KHills5058
K
K
2013 Mustang GT Procharger Stage 2 Kit Issues
  • KHills5058
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
223
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 10, 2025
KHills5058
K
D
Progress Thread 1989 GT Procharged
  • Dreamcar
  • Aug 4, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 8, 2025
raynist1
R
B
Subframe connector question
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
808
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 5, 2026
rednotch
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?