• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Which Supercharger? For 10:1 compression?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pokageek
  • Start date Start date Dec 23, 2006

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Dec 23, 2006
#1
  • Dec 23, 2006
  • #1
I am looking for great low end-mid range punch and best supercharger for 10:1 compression. I have seen paxtons @9psi for $1250 online. Are these good ones? Thanks!:SNSign:
 

S351R"Animal"

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
708
0
16
Manhattan, KS
Dec 23, 2006
#2
  • Dec 23, 2006
  • #2
You have too much compression for a blower. You can run that much compression with a blower but, you have to have aftermarket electronics, built bottom end ( and be ready to go into it after each weekend), big injectors, and a larger fuel system.
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Dec 24, 2006
#3
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #3
+1
Or unless your wallet is pretty thick, you could probably run race gas, at somewhere in the neighborhood of $5 a gallon. It could probably be done on pump gas, but you'd be leaving some power on the table due to the very conservative tune you'd have to run.
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
Dec 24, 2006
#4
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #4
You could run a relatively low boost Eaton combo with that compression with little or no trouble at all so long as the tune was good. Looking to a centri blower for the low to mid range grunt you mentioned, is a step in the wrong direction IMO.

Discharge temps from an Eaton at 3 - 6 psi should be low enough that it won't cost you much in the way of timing (although it will cost some but they are VERY thermally efficient in these ranges). I would think that a setup like this would give you a huge change in throttle grunt. Just keep boost pressures low and don't try to overspin the blower.
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Dec 24, 2006
#5
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #5
meth injection would probably be needed too
 

MattZ281LE

Founding Member
Feb 6, 2000
345
1
19
Purcellville, Va
Dec 24, 2006
#6
  • Dec 24, 2006
  • #6
6psi tops on mild tune pump gas. LS1 Cars are 10.1 and thats what their kits are for, ATI with intercooler. Not worth the cost IMHO. Nitrous in your case would be better.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Dec 25, 2006
#7
  • Dec 25, 2006
  • #7
Ok. Thanks guys. Here is a few more questions then:

#1 What kind or rwhp I could get out of it safely then? I am at 290+rwhp now but the car doesn't habe the low end grunt I remember from my 5.7L.
#2 Is the retarded timing because of the compression be what kills the potential rwhp?
#3 Would it be smarter to go larger short block instead?
#4 If I went 9:1 compression instead of 10:1 on a new 347, how much HP am I losing n/a?
#5 If I slap my 306 trick flow heads on the 347, will it make good HP?
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Dec 25, 2006
#8
  • Dec 25, 2006
  • #8
Daggar said:
You could run a relatively low boost Eaton combo with that compression with little or no trouble at all so long as the tune was good. Looking to a centri blower for the low to mid range grunt you mentioned, is a step in the wrong direction IMO.

Discharge temps from an Eaton at 3 - 6 psi should be low enough that it won't cost you much in the way of timing (although it will cost some but they are VERY thermally efficient in these ranges). I would think that a setup like this would give you a huge change in throttle grunt. Just keep boost pressures low and don't try to overspin the blower.
Click to expand...

I agree here have a vortech and it is a great "top end" blower, doesn't make power til the upper rpm range. A roots style blower is a low end torque machine. I would lower the compression then go blower. Put a thicker gasket on it to lower compression.
 

reddy351

10 Year Member
Jun 13, 2006
559
12
38
Columbus, Ohio
Dec 25, 2006
#9
  • Dec 25, 2006
  • #9
"There is no replacement for displacement."

If you are used to 350 cid, then there is not a lot that can be done but go back to it (or better). You could put a 347 together for "resonable" money. Or you could just drop in a 351w roller motor. That's what Ford did in '95. Should be an almost direct swap. You'll need headers, oil pan/pickup and a distributor. Of course guys are taking their 351s out to about 100 cid more than that, too.

Good luck in you search for power!!!
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Dec 25, 2006
#10
  • Dec 25, 2006
  • #10
reddy351 said:
"There is no replacement for displacement."

If you are used to 350 cid, then there is not a lot that can be done but go back to it (or better). You could put a 347 together for "resonable" money. Or you could just drop in a 351w roller motor. That's what Ford did in '95. Should be an almost direct swap. You'll need headers, oil pan/pickup and a distributor. Of course guys are taking their 351s out to about 100 cid more than that, too.

God luck in you search for power!!!
Click to expand...

I would like to do that but it would probably have me putting more $$ into the car than I want to. Being less experienced initially, I thought putting a H/C/I and getting a 5.0 beyond the power of my old LT1 would be enough. Truth is though that the 5.7 felt stronger due to a longer torque curve and more tq lower down. That's something you cant get withsmaller engines.
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Dec 27, 2006
#11
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #11
Pokageek said:
Being less experienced initially, I thought putting a H/C/I and getting a 5.0 beyond the power of my old LT1 would be enough.
Click to expand...
your first mistake sir was thinking that the horsepower bug wasnt going to bite you.....at 10:1 compression, the tune is crucial with any power adder. my recommendation would be nitrous over a blower though. it will give you the low end that you want that a centrifugal blower cant provide.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Dec 27, 2006
#12
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #12
Green 94 5.0 said:
your first mistake sir was thinking that the horsepower bug wasnt going to bite you.....at 10:1 compression, the tune is crucial with any power adder. my recommendation would be nitrous over a blower though. it will give you the low end that you want that a centrifugal blower cant provide.
Click to expand...

Yep. You are right man. So if I build a 347 at 9:1 compr, how much rwhp power am I leaving on the table n.a. vs 10:1? Also, if I want to go sprcharged or turbo down the road is 9:1 ok? Thanks guys.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Dec 27, 2006
#13
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #13
I wouldn't put a power adder on a high compression motor. You can get away with it but why even risk it. I'm running 10:1 and I love it the way it is. I did the blower thing and its just way too finicky. I don't miss my Vortech at all. Like mentioned the tune is the only way a blower works correctly. Without a tune its a time bomb. Tick...tick...tick....BOOM! There goes the internals. Been there and its way too costly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
1995 5.0 just cranks
  • 9GT5
  • Jun 29, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
350
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2025
AeroCoupe
T
Service Fluid Recommendations for 2015 Paxton Supercharged GT
  • ThotTrap
  • Aug 25, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
120
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Aug 25, 2025
ThotTrap
T
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
79
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
1
Electrical Headlight harness trouble
  • 1985fox
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
200
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
295
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?