• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Which system provides a crisper, more accurate timing signal - Unilite or Pertronix?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chepsk8
  • Start date Start date Feb 6, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

NasaGT

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
1,993
2
49
Virginia
Feb 14, 2008
#21
  • Feb 14, 2008
  • #21
I don't mean to hijack, but since this has turned into a duraspark thread, whats a good donor vehicle for a 351w duraspark setup?
 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Feb 14, 2008
#22
  • Feb 14, 2008
  • #22
I've used both Pertronix and Unilite with my Crane Hi6 box, and they've both worked very well, I'm not really sure if I can tell the difference. The only reason I stopped using Pertronix was because I found a good deal on a used Mallory Unilite distributor, which is what I'm currently running.

Of course, my windsor doesn't make any power at high rpms anyway right now, so they probably performed the same on my application.

Hopefully that will change in May when I stick that cam in there.
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Feb 14, 2008
#23
  • Feb 14, 2008
  • #23
htwheelz67 said:
Now say your driving away from home and your pertronix or unilite goes out, can you go to your local auto parts and get a replacement part right away? I dont think so......
Click to expand...

Ah but you are assuming that everyone runs out in their car unprepared. In your scenario I still have to hoof it to the parts store. A back up set of points and condensor is just one of many items I keep in my survival bag in the trunk so that in 20 mins I am back on the raod where I belong instead of sitting roadside or shamefully being towed back into town.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 14, 2008
#24
  • Feb 14, 2008
  • #24
Pakrat said:
Ah but you are assuming that everyone runs out in their car unprepared. In your scenario I still have to hoof it to the parts store. A back up set of points and condensor is just one of many items I keep in my survival bag in the trunk so that in 20 mins I am back on the raod where I belong instead of sitting roadside or shamefully being towed back into town.
Click to expand...



i can do even better than that, i keep a spare module for my unilite AND a set of points and condensor, plus a rotor for each as well, since my unilite doesn't use the standard ford rotor
 
M

mjjj04

New Member
Feb 11, 2007
14
0
0
Feb 15, 2008
#25
  • Feb 15, 2008
  • #25
DURASPARK hands down the best unit IMHO. The duraspark has outperformed my unilite,msd and a generic brand dizzy(302) in the aspects of dependability and tunability. I also prefer the duraspark to the msd I have in my 351 now so I'll wait until the unit fails then go to the duraspark.
 

RGS0907

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
429
1
0
New Jersey
Mar 21, 2008
#26
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #26
Best Distributor Options

At the risk of hijacking this thread... What do y'all think is the best distributor for an FE engine, preferably with an adjustable advance and as stock appearing as possible? I want to throw out my old MSD setup & go with something that works well but looks more stock. I know that I need a stronger spark, the 428's run very rich.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Mar 21, 2008
#27
  • Mar 21, 2008
  • #27
RGS0907 said:
At the risk of hijacking this thread... What do y'all think is the best distributor for an FE engine, preferably with an adjustable advance and as stock appearing as possible? I want to throw out my old MSD setup & go with something that works well but looks more stock. I know that I need a stronger spark, the 428's run very rich.
Click to expand...



i'd go with the duraspark dizzy and an masd box hidden under the dash. get a duraspark dizzy from a mid 70's ford pickup with the 360 or 390 engine, just make sure it's 75 or newer model
 

RGS0907

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
429
1
0
New Jersey
Mar 22, 2008
#28
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #28
bnickel said:
i'd go with the duraspark dizzy and an masd box hidden under the dash. get a duraspark dizzy from a mid 70's ford pickup with the 360 or 390 engine, just make sure it's 75 or newer model
Click to expand...

Right now I have an MSD setup on a stock dizzy. I'm torn between making it look as stock as possible and getting something high end like a D.U.I. The DUI may be a better option for me since I'd rather not run wires & hide the box etc. Do you have any experience or heard anything about the DUI?
 

chepsk8

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2001
2,203
3
49
Easton, PA
Mar 22, 2008
#29
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #29
On my 428, I did a very simple system which was basically the same as I outlined originally. I bought a new stock distributor, pulled the points and put in the Unilite Kit. I added the quickest advance springs I could find, and blocked the vacuum advance, but left it there for stock appearance. Top quality cap, 8.5mm all-black wires, a MSD coil painted black to look stock, and new, high quality plugs, and that system was trouble free for the two years I had it in the car before the ex took it. To my knowlege, seven years later, it is still untouched. While I had it, I would check the occasional plug, perfect every time.

I should also add, thay I did ALOT of carb tuning, and that also is critical in getting these motors to sing. It has a Holley 3310 750, and once I got the jetting nailed, it was perfect. Grey exhaust, instant starts, and 13.80's in full street trim.

Work with those two areas, and you'll have it. No high-dollar stuff needed.
 
M

mikethebike

Member
Jun 12, 2007
358
0
17
Greenville, SC
Mar 22, 2008
#30
  • Mar 22, 2008
  • #30
I ran a Unilite in 1975 on the BOSS-302 when you had a seperate box for the electronics. THAT was one of the tings that taught me to NOT BE the '1st on the block' with anything. They work much better 33 years later.
When GM offered the new LT-1 they used an LED trigger..2 of them. I've heard all the high dollar Kraut Kars are using a similar system. That leads me to believe the LED trigger is more accurate. But on a car like these would it ever matter?
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Mar 23, 2008
#31
  • Mar 23, 2008
  • #31
I've used Pertronix for years in several cars and never had a failure or any problem. My experience was I never had to touch the thing once I put it in, and rotors and caps lasted a lot longer than with points. I've never carried a spare either (knock on wood).

I'm currently running Duraspark in the '70, but if I had it to do again I would run Pertronix. The Duraspark works fine, but it's a lot more wires.
 

RGS0907

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
429
1
0
New Jersey
Mar 24, 2008
#32
  • Mar 24, 2008
  • #32
chepsk8 said:
On my 428, I did a very simple system which was basically the same as I outlined originally. I bought a new stock distributor, pulled the points and put in the Unilite Kit. I added the quickest advance springs I could find, and blocked the vacuum advance, but left it there for stock appearance. Top quality cap, 8.5mm all-black wires, a MSD coil painted black to look stock, and new, high quality plugs, and that system was trouble free for the two years I had it in the car before the ex took it. To my knowlege, seven years later, it is still untouched. While I had it, I would check the occasional plug, perfect every time.

I should also add, thay I did ALOT of carb tuning, and that also is critical in getting these motors to sing. It has a Holley 3310 750, and once I got the jetting nailed, it was perfect. Grey exhaust, instant starts, and 13.80's in full street trim.

Work with those two areas, and you'll have it. No high-dollar stuff needed.
Click to expand...

Hmm. I was thinking about doing just that & then I read how the stock distributors are a weak design with only a single bushing & started looking for a better distributor. I have the factory dual-point distributor, I wonder if they were built any stronger?

Dan; by the way, why did you block the vacuum advance? I thought that it was better for the street to keep it intact?
 

chepsk8

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2001
2,203
3
49
Easton, PA
Mar 24, 2008
#33
  • Mar 24, 2008
  • #33
I found that with the vacuum, it backfired alot and was temperamental.

If I had kept the car, I would have gotten a dual-point and pulled off the vacuum canister, locked the plate, so it looked like a classic dual-point with the electronic guts.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Engine 1992 Mustang Hesitation/Cutting-Out
  • RTW0223
  • May 2, 2018
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
14K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 26, 2025
Noobz347
D
help with new 302 HO in a 90
  • DrClaw7
  • Sep 10, 2010
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 15, 2010
jrichker
The Night of the Hurricane (a really long stupid story)
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jun 26, 2011
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 1, 2011
VibrantRedGT
M90 root blower how to info
  • 1987LXragtop
  • Jan 7, 2011
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
8K
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jan 7, 2011
1987LXragtop
New TVS blower pulley from Carmen Goudey
  • DiMora
  • Oct 3, 2009
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
5K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jan 25, 2010
NastyStang113
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?