• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Who has a Comp Cams Xtreme Energy XE250H Cam

  • Thread starter Thread starter bad68coupe
  • Start date Start date Oct 3, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Oct 7, 2006
#21
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #21
Anyone read that awesome article in Popular Hotrodding about how cams work and how to choose one? I'll see if I can find them, read um over and give you the jist of what the guy was saying about them.

The 1.7 rocker was something the guy said was good because it accelorates the valves open faster, meaning more time with higher air flow through the head. Makes a cam look like a bigger one.
 

bad68coupe

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
220
0
0
Richardson, TX
Oct 7, 2006
#22
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #22
jikelly said:
Anyone read that awesome article in Popular Hotrodding about how cams work and how to choose one? I'll see if I can find them, read um over and give you the jist of what the guy was saying about them.

The 1.7 rocker was something the guy said was good because it accelorates the valves open faster, meaning more time with higher air flow through the head. Makes a cam look like a bigger one.
Click to expand...

I read that article and loved it
 

bad68coupe

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
220
0
0
Richardson, TX
Oct 7, 2006
#23
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #23
ashford said:
a smaller cam dosent always mean better gas milage. in my falcon i had a 289 with ported heads and a crane 270 grind in it. in town it got about 14 mpg town and 21 on the highway with an auto. i blew it up(!$%#@$&) and decided i didnt need power for a cruiser and built a 302 with the same heads and went for a "economy"(245 grind)with a t-5, with very dismal results. 15 mpg town and 17 highway. it had absolutly no power at all, and wouldn't turn past 4000rpm. i eventually just dropped in a 5.0 HO fuel injection and all. 16 in town 19 on the highway.

on the other hand i have my capri. my last configuration(havn't done gas milage with new motor) was a roller 302 ported early 289 heads with 1.92 1.50 valves, e303 cam,625 road demon, t-5 and 3.08 gears. hold onto your pants here 6-8 mpg town 32mpg at 80mph a/f gauge in the green.
Click to expand...

how did the e303 sound?
 

ashford

Member
Dec 19, 2003
485
0
16
fargo ND
Oct 7, 2006
#24
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #24
moderately choppy at idle. smooth tone when on the throttle.
 

CarFreakGT

20+ Year Stangneter
May 26, 2003
395
11
29
Louisville, KY
Oct 7, 2006
#25
  • Oct 7, 2006
  • #25
jikelly said:
Anyone read that awesome article in Popular Hotrodding about how cams work and how to choose one? I'll see if I can find them, read um over and give you the jist of what the guy was saying about them.
Click to expand...


Do you remember what issue that was? I would love to get a hold of it and check out the article.
 

XXBULLETSXX

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
301
0
0
Kannapolis, NC
Oct 8, 2006
#26
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #26
bad68coupe said:
From what i understand there is not beniefit of going full roller other than it is more stable at higher rpm's which i will only flirt with once or twice, why do you say to go full roller? what would be the best combination for gas milage, because when you think about it gas milage is nothing but effeciency, and when the engine is effecient it is also making power, i figure that up to a point they go hand in hand. I am just trying to do it right the first time.
Click to expand...

Roller cams are definetly NOT for a high RPM application. In high RPM's roller lifters will tend to float your valves. This is why when shops build race motors which will see a lot of high RPM (above 6500) they will never use roller lifters. Take NASCAR for example, their motors are built to hit 10K RPM they use solid flat tappet lifters. Now that may be a NASCAR rule that they use flat tappet lifters but in other applications like Daytona Prototypes this would not be an issue yet they still elect to use the flat lifters. Because of their very high tech use in these two applications I certainly wouldn't call them "old technology" but they certainly have been around longer. But they still have their uses.
To answer your question about when to use them and if they are more efficeint, they are more efficeint and allow for a steeper ramp on your cam. Full roller motors will also run cooler since there is less friction within the motor which causes heat. Not to sound like a commercial but heat will help to break down your oil. Now most of us change our oil on a regular basis so this is not much of an issue.
To sum up a really long discussion about all this, roller motors tend to last longer if you don't abuse them.

Hope that helps and answer your questions.
 

67topless

Member
Mar 31, 2006
203
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Oct 8, 2006
#27
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #27
Sharps-Nut said:
...My question now goes to 67topless whis runnning the cam. Is it at all choppy at idle?...
Click to expand...

I think it has a great idle (personal prefference of course), but probably not what you are looking for. It sounds lilke there is something going on under the hood, but doesn't sound like a dragster either. I can send you a link to to a dyno video that progresses from idle to WOT. Gives you a good idea of how it sounds sitting at a stoplight...

Scott
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Oct 8, 2006
#28
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #28
I really don't think there is an engine builder in racing that would use a flat tappet if the rules don't require it. Hydraulic rollers are not much help for a mild cam. When rpm and spring pressure get high, there is a definate advantage. I have seen stock flat tappets go over 200K miles enough times to doubt that friction and wear, though present, are what kills motors or even present much friction. To run a HR in a non-roller block will cost plenty as well. For new parts including cam, lifters, springs and push rods, you will be nearing $900 or $1000. Call Comp Cams and get them to help you with what you need.
 

LONN17

Founding Member
Dec 1, 2000
135
1
17
Oceanport, NJ
Oct 8, 2006
#29
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #29
Just finished my cam install - comp cams XE274H. Here is a video of it running w/ open headers. Sounds pretty mean now. We'll see w/ the mangaflow installed.

http://s65.photobucket.com/albums/h...current=tide015.flv&refPage=&imgAnch=imgAnch1

(this was cold start w/ no choke so it wanted to stall and it was hard since I had to keep the rpms down for the neighbors sake)

This one is w/ a basically stock engine and worn no-name turbo mufflers...
http://s65.photobucket.com/albums/h...rent=Picture069.flv&refPage=&imgAnch=imgAnch2

Trevor
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Oct 8, 2006
#30
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #30
I can't wait to hear that with a full exhaust and mufflers!!! Sounds like it's going to be mean.
 

LONN17

Founding Member
Dec 1, 2000
135
1
17
Oceanport, NJ
Oct 8, 2006
#31
  • Oct 8, 2006
  • #31
... one more once it was ready to "idle" (800rpm w/ a manual).

http://s65.photobucket.com/albums/h...current=tide016.flv&refPage=&imgAnch=imgAnch1

P.S. I dont usually keep the boat halfway on the driveway but the tide-surge from yesterdays NorEasterly winds put it there.

Trevor
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Oct 9, 2006
#32
  • Oct 9, 2006
  • #32
CarFreakGT said:
Do you remember what issue that was? I would love to get a hold of it and check out the article.
Click to expand...

I found the issue. I'll get it out when I get home and let you know which one it is. Think I'd get introuble if I scanned it?
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Oct 10, 2006
#33
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #33
The issue was July 2006. Oh and August had the second part. I found the article online. On Popular Hotroddings website.

http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tech/0607phr_camshaft_basics/
 
5

57fairlane

New Member
Apr 2, 2005
560
0
0
Oakwood, GA
Oct 10, 2006
#34
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #34
I am of the opinion that you should ditch the 289 and get a $100 junkyard special 5.0.

Used GT-40 heads, cobra intake, e-cam.
With 3.73s and a t-5 these motors typically get 17-18 around town and 25ish on the highway. Or stick with the stock cam and run 1.7 rollers . . . slightly better mileage. Put down 260rwhp 290rwtq.

If you want to stick with the 289, I would go with the xe256 if you want to stay comp. Port the heads or find some $500 big valve, screw-in stud 351 D0OE heads on EBAY. It seems like everyone has a set nowadays. You will have to mill those . . .

At any rate, you will need overdrive. Mileage and power do not mix with a c4.
 

bad68coupe

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
220
0
0
Richardson, TX
Oct 10, 2006
#35
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #35
alright what i am thinking is the cam that was mentioned at the beggining of this thread, and 351 heads, can i do that, will they fit?
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Oct 10, 2006
#36
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #36
Yes 351w heads will fit, not sure about 351m or 351c heads, but (there is always a catch) you will need different head bolts since the 351 engines use head bolts that are a larger diameter around. So your bolts will be to small.

I have seen adapter bolts for the 302 engine so you can use 351w heads from ARP.
 

bad68coupe

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
220
0
0
Richardson, TX
Oct 10, 2006
#37
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #37
des anyone know the size valves that come in a stock 351w head?:SNSign:
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Oct 10, 2006
#38
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #38
1.84, 1.54
 

bad68coupe

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
220
0
0
Richardson, TX
Oct 10, 2006
#39
  • Oct 10, 2006
  • #39
what size are the valves on stock 302 heads?
 

bad68coupe

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
220
0
0
Richardson, TX
Oct 11, 2006
#40
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #40
I may be wrong but my research showed 1.60,1.30 is that right it seems awfully small.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
comp cams 281hr
  • mobilly
  • Mar 20, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
18
Views
611
The Welcome Wagon Mar 23, 2025
89ripper
K
Resolved Weird sound coming from a freshly rebuilt 5.0L
  • karhoot
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
212
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 27, 2026
Mac131
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
856
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
325
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?