• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

Who uses premium gas in their 2v 4.6?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ateup
  • Start date Start date Nov 4, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Ateup

Active Member
Sep 21, 2009
748
2
28
Nov 4, 2009
#1
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #1
The guy I bought mine from used premium so I have been too. Is there any harm in doing so? Any benefits? The owner's manual said it was designed for regular and using premium isn't recommended. Just wanted some opinions. Thanks in advance.
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Nov 4, 2009
#2
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #2
Your car is designed to run on 87. You will not benefit, and probably see a decrease in performance if you up to 91-93 octane. Unless you have a timing adjuster, or a custom tune with more timing, stick with 87.
 

ThePumpkin

New Member
Jan 26, 2009
55
0
0
Missouri
Nov 4, 2009
#3
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #3
welp. I dont have a 2v 4.6.... but I do run premium from BP.
When I first bought the car, I ran 87, then switched to 93. I noticed a slight difference in performance (maybe it was just mental) but it sure did feel like an increase in throttle response.. So i've run 93 since.
I would imagine that the owners manual says no premium because of the low compression, its not needed unless your running some form of forced induction or a stroker kit...
The difference between "regular" and premium is probably not going to effect your car THAT much as long as its unleaded. ... Thats another story, race gas will foul your 02s in a heartbeat.
Although,
Im interested in seeing what have to say about this... i've often wondered in the past if im wasting my money on 93
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Nov 4, 2009
#4
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #4
ThePumpkin said:
Im interested in seeing what have to say about this... i've often wondered in the past if im wasting my money on 93
Click to expand...

yes, your are wasting your money.
 

ThePumpkin

New Member
Jan 26, 2009
55
0
0
Missouri
Nov 4, 2009
#5
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #5
Winters98GT said:
Your car is designed to run on 87. You will not benefit, and probably see a decrease in performance if you up to 91-93 octane. Unless you have a timing adjuster, or a custom tune with more timing, stick with 87.
Click to expand...


Theres the answer. I did notice a HUGE increase in power from a 93 octane tune.
A good tune will work wonders for any car.
But i still swear i noticed a little increase in performance when i was 95% stock... I guess it was just mental
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Nov 4, 2009
#6
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #6
ThePumpkin said:
Theres the answer. I did notice a HUGE increase in power from a 93 octane tune.
A good tune will work wonders for any car.
But i still swear i noticed a little increase in performance when i was 95% stock... I guess it was just mental
Click to expand...

I would make sure that the car does not have any aftermarket tune on it, first. Detonation can due damage to a motor. If you run 87 and don't hear any detonation, or pinging, you probably have a stock tune and should keep the 87 in the car until you get a custom tune.
 

ThePumpkin

New Member
Jan 26, 2009
55
0
0
Missouri
Nov 4, 2009
#7
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #7
Winters98GT said:
I would make sure that the car does not have any aftermarket tune on it, first. Detonation can due damage to a motor. If you run 87 and don't hear any detonation, or pinging, you probably have a stock tune and should keep the 87 in the car until you get a custom tune.
Click to expand...

I have a custom tune... and oh wait... a 66mm turbo. haha forgot about that.
I was just refering to when I was mostly stock.
 

Winters98GT

Whoop...whoop-whoop-whoop-whoop...GANGNAM STYLE!!!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,520
1,291
224
H Town
Nov 4, 2009
#8
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #8
ThePumpkin said:
I have a custom tune... and oh wait... a 66mm turbo. haha forgot about that.
I was just refering to when I was mostly stock.
Click to expand...



Since that is the case, I wouldn't be putting any Mom/Pop Gas in your car. Use the best, Chevron with Techron or Shell. No need to blow a motor over a bad tank of gas. You should know that owning a FI car!
 

VEE EIGHT

Member
Apr 27, 2009
85
0
6
Texas
Nov 4, 2009
#9
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #9
To the OP, only run premium if you've adjusted your timing or have a high-octane tune. I know that you have neither so you're just wasting your money.
 
9

95.0Stang

Member
Feb 20, 2003
538
1
18
Kansas
Nov 4, 2009
#10
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #10
I went on a road trip...a 6 hour drive. I always use 91 octane and this would be no different. The first leg of the trip from Topeka to STL I got 27mpg, pretty good for a V8 car right? Then I filled up at a Mobil station in STL with 93 octane, really this was just to do it, I didnt expect any gains at all, but from STL to Indianapolis I got 30.2mpg which shocked the heck out of me! As I was leaving Indy I filled up with 92 octane which is the highest I could find around my hotel, and from Indy to STL I got 28mpg. Stopped at the same Mobil station in STL and filled up with 93 again, and the car did 30.1mpg back home to Topeka. This is MY experience, and why I just always use premium. I am sure there are variables, but honestly I thought these results were really great considering how my car is equiped. Ford said 26mpg HWY on the new car stcker for this car, so to beat that is impressive to me.
Current mods that COULD effect MPG...
1. O/R H-Pipe
2. Magnaflow Catback
3. Eibach Lowering springs( I figure aerodynamics may change and help)

Mods that SHOULD lower MPG
1. Heavier aftermarket Bullitt wheels
2. Heavier BFG tires in front
3. Heavier Goodyears to fit the 17x10.5 wheel in the back
4. Over 100 pounds of luggage in the trunk

Again this is purely my experience, and not based in science at all, just an FYI type thing!
 

Pearl02

Member
Nov 27, 2004
496
0
16
Kansas City
Nov 4, 2009
#11
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #11
Ateup said:
The guy I bought mine from used premium so I have been too. Is there any harm in doing so? Any benefits? The owner's manual said it was designed for regular and using premium isn't recommended. Just wanted some opinions. Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...

Like everyone else said don't run premium fuel in your car unless it's tune to do so. I work for a gas pipeline company. Our lab runs test for the quality control of all the products we handle. They use what we car a "knock" engine for octane testing. It's just a one cylinder engine bolted to a concrete base. The lab techs are able to advance and retard timing on the fly. Permuim fuel burns at a slower rate than unleaded. More timing can be added for improved power and torque. The testing takes awhile to complete. This is how we determine octane ratings for gas. It's been about 15yrs since I've seen this test run but it hasn't changed. What I have seen is if premuim fuel is ran with not enough timing carbon build up can happen. That can lead to pre ignition which can cause some problems down the road. Pearl02.
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Nov 4, 2009
#12
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #12
Use top tier fuel and use an octane that is appropriate for your mods and tune.

I always run Shell 93 octane and I never let it get below 1/4 tank but I have a FI 4V.

When I had my old 2001 GT I would use Shell 87 but I would occasionally run higher octanes of Shell gas.

Top Tier Gasoline
 

98COBRA281

10 Year Member
Nov 24, 2007
1,348
30
59
Port St. Lucie, Florida
Nov 4, 2009
#13
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #13
i run 93, because of my tune/compression



so shell is a pretty good gas? i used mobil for a while, but it sucks, lots of corbon deposites, in my and my dads motor, we pulled my dads heads off a few years ago, and the exhaust ports were filled with a thick coat of carbon
 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member
Nov 10, 2004
1,351
59
68
Maryland
Nov 4, 2009
#14
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #14
98COBRA281 said:
i run 93, because of my tune/compression



so shell is a pretty good gas? i used mobil for a while, but it sucks, lots of corbon deposites, in my and my dads motor, we pulled my dads heads off a few years ago, and the exhaust ports were filled with a thick coat of carbon
Click to expand...

i always try and use shell or bp. im not a big fan of anything else, too many horror stories
 

stangGT97

New Member
Dec 22, 2004
1,299
1
0
Boston area, MA
Nov 4, 2009
#15
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #15
When I fill my car up with Shell 87octane in Massachusetts, it runs fantastic. When I get back to NY and have to use gas from ANY station out here, it runs worse. I'm not impressed by the quality of Mobil gasolines, but where I am, my only choices are Hess, Mobil, Sunoco or Stewart's Shops gas, and Mobil is the least awful but still pretty bad.

Long story short, use 87 on a bone stock GT.
 

tank_567

Active Member
Mar 19, 2007
731
26
29
Raleigh, Nc
Nov 4, 2009
#16
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #16
I have two tunes, 89 and 93, i saw a 4rwhp difference between the two. I've been running 89 in my car and have been seeing 280-300 to a tank, about the same mpg on the 93 tune.
 

patman0911

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
2,287
0
46
Tuscaloosa, AL
Nov 4, 2009
#17
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #17
I run 93 now because i cranked up my base timing with a timing adjuster. I ran 89 before the T/A because I thought I was feeling slight hesitation and pinging with 87, probably due to the 150 degree air and 500% humidity we have down here - oxygen molecules are far and few between in the summer.

As stated 50 times in this thread already, use 87 unless you've got a real reason not too - pinging or hesitation, or increased timing.

For what it's worth, I like Chevron with Techron. My car always seems happier when I fill up at the Chevron station but that may just be my imagination. In reality, I think any of the major brands are probably fine.
 

oxfordgt

Member
Apr 30, 2006
288
2
18
Clarksville, TN
Nov 4, 2009
#18
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #18
This is a simple question to answer. If your not tuned for it then don't run it. Running 93 octane in a car tuned for 87 will cause carbon build up in the combustion chamber. Higher octane fuel burns slower which means that on a stock timing tune you will not burn all of the gas. This is what causes carbon build up and a loss i power.
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Nov 4, 2009
#19
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #19
93 and 110 here

on a bone stock 2V, 87 will be fine.
 
3

302GTS

If you need herpes, I'm your man!
Apr 20, 2009
481
2
18
Largo, FL
Nov 4, 2009
#20
  • Nov 4, 2009
  • #20
As said previously in this thread, it's an absolute waste of money, unless you're running higher timing (like the 5.0 guys!), or you have a tune for anything more than 87 octane. Our cars come from Ford built to run 87, that's why the 5.0's came with 10* BTDC timing, which can be bumped up if you choose to run a higher octane fuel.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
B
Questions About T5 Manual
  • Blackout67
  • Apr 13, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
618
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
89ripper
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
766
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
G
Supercharger Options 5.4 32V Intech
  • Germangazguzzler
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Other Auto Tech Apr 23, 2025
RaggedGT
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?