• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Why Aluminum Intake Manifolds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackstangt
  • Start date Start date Jun 19, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Jun 19, 2008
#1
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #1
Phenolic spacers are supposed to reduce the conduction of heat trough the lower intake to the upper intake, thereby lowering the condution of heat into the air entering the combustion chamber. I've read that it makes a minimal difference, which is probably right, because the engine radiates heat and conducts to the upper intake manifold through other methods.

Isn't this the wrong way to go about reducing conduction to the induced air? Wouldn't it be better to use a material that conducts less or retains more heat? For instance, some newer cars have plastic upper intake manifolds. The plastic won't really conduct heat into the induced air, weighs less and would be much cheaper to upgrade to. Other materials, even other metals conduct less heat than aluminum, so why not use them?

What I've thought of so far is weight, which I just adressed with the plastic upper or would be possible with heavier less conductive materials if they were designed more box-like ie. GT-40.

Running boost should not be an issue if using any of these materials, because they are used in other areas of the system.

Heat could be a factor in extreme conditions with plastic, which is why I mention other materials. Less cooling of the engine, this is why there is a liquid cooling system, we're not flying Cessnas or riding motorcycles...

This could apply to the lower intake as well, as long as you're not trying to use plastic.

Anyone have any other specific materials in mind?
 

RYC CUKR

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
1,437
1
38
Orlando
Jun 19, 2008
#2
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #2
Ford has already gone the composite route with the mod motors and I believe that they ended up having so many problems with them leaking coolant, getting brittle and cracking that they added a lifetime warranty for the intake manifolds on the 96-98 4.6s.

I prefer aluminum just from a longevity standpoint. I have never seen an aluminum intake go bad just bolted to the car. I have seen composite ones crap out just from age, and not that much age might I add.

There used to be a few composite boxed upper intakes on the market. I believe that one was made by Cartech but I can't be 100% certain about the name.
 

lx93notch

New Member
Oct 10, 2007
24
0
0
coventry, rhode island
Jun 19, 2008
#3
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #3
yup your right about that, almost every 2v ford mod motor has a recall out for that crossover tube on the front of the intake
 

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Jun 19, 2008
#4
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #4
Ok, well that's one type, what about all of the others? I wonder if the GT-40 gets an unaccuonted for advantage over the thicker aluminum intakes out there because of how thin the tubes are. Thin tubes won't get as "heat soaked" as larger masses of aluminum.

I know I'm going to get a little Smokey Yunik here, but what about ceramic?
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jun 19, 2008
#5
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #5
just run nitrous and you will never have to worry about your intake being hot. My intake is Ice cold after a blast down the track on the giggle gas.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jun 19, 2008
#6
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #6
I had to swap out my 1998 plastic composite intake, but it is not because the composite, just they designed it bad and it would crack at a joint in the coolant runner. 1999 to the present day have no problems whatsoever. They are plastic composite.

LsX intakes, Hemi intakes, etc. are all the new lightweight plastic composite.

I have a handful of newer intakes at the house.

- 4.6L 3V
- 4.6L PI
- 4.6L NPI
- LS1

They are all in the 10-15 lb range. Much better than the cheap priced cast aluminum 45-50 lb intakes for the 5.0L.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Jun 19, 2008
#7
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #7
There are definately better materials now but a lot of engines new engines don't use the intake manifold as part of its structural integrity.The 4.6 is a pretty stout block to begin with and the fact that it doesn't have a cam also makes the valley much stronger. The Ford FE is a perfect example of the intake is designed into the integrity of the block and I would imagine that all of the engines of that era have some sort of design where the intake manifold helped the motor from splitting. It's just that we are playing with 40 year old motors is all...
Kevin
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
new york
Jun 19, 2008
#8
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #8
GT40 tubular weighs in at 8lbs. I'll stick with my aluminum hahaha @ least you can polish them up, cant do that with plastic!

Later Ant
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Jun 19, 2008
#9
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #9
Ya I am not sure about 45-50 lbs... thats what both my heads weigh together. Plastic upper might not be a bad idea... might look tacky but there are a couple of box uppers that are plastic already.
Kevin.
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
new york
Jun 19, 2008
#10
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #10
When i did my H/C/I swap and pulled off the E7's, 50lbs and then slapped on gt40 tubular intake another 15lbs, dude seriously, the front end of the stang actually rose a bit! hahahah
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jun 19, 2008
#11
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #11
Personally I would want something that could displell heat rather then will just warp if things get a little 2 toasty.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jun 19, 2008
#12
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #12
A GT40 Tubular intake does not weigh 8 lbs.

I actually may have been a little off. I know a handful of them are in the 40 lb range (upper and lower, plus hardware).

A pair of aluminum heads weighed 60 lbs for me. The irons were just over 100 lbs for me as well.
 

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Jun 19, 2008
#13
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #13
5spd GT said:
I had to swap out my 1998 plastic composite intake, but it is not because the composite, just they designed it bad and it would crack at a joint in the coolant runner. 1999 to the present day have no problems whatsoever. They are plastic composite.

LsX intakes, Hemi intakes, etc. are all the new lightweight plastic composite.

I have a handful of newer intakes at the house.

- 4.6L 3V
- 4.6L PI
- 4.6L NPI
- LS1

They are all in the 10-15 lb range. Much better than the cheap priced cast aluminum 45-50 lb intakes for the 5.0L.
Click to expand...

That's what I'm getting at, when are they going to come out with a light composite intake manifold for our good ol 5.0?

Or did they already?
 

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Jun 19, 2008
#14
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #14
Sicarius428 said:
There are definately better materials now but a lot of engines new engines don't use the intake manifold as part of its structural integrity.The 4.6 is a pretty stout block to begin with and the fact that it doesn't have a cam also makes the valley must stronger. The Ford FE is a perfect example of the intake is designed into the integrity of the block and I would imagine that all of the engines of that era have some sort of design where the intake manifold helped the motor from splitting. It's just that we are playing with 40 year old motors is all...
Kevin
Click to expand...

The upper intake provides no strength fr the block though, and this is where much of the heat would be transferred. What about a coating for the inside of the lower intake with a nonconductive material as well?
 

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Jun 19, 2008
#15
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #15
Sicarius428 said:
Ya I am not sure about 45-50 lbs... thats what both my heads weigh together. Plastic upper might not be a bad idea... might look tacky but there are a couple of box uppers that are plastic already.
Kevin.
Click to expand...

Who sells them?
 

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Jun 19, 2008
#16
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #16
86bluecobra said:
Personally I would want something that could displell heat rather then will just warp if things get a little 2 toasty.
Click to expand...

It wouldn't warp if made properly, as far as removing heat, buy a better radiator if you need to, that's what it's for. The intake manifold doesn't compare to the cooling capacity of the radiator.
 

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Jun 19, 2008
#17
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #17
5spd GT said:
A GT40 Tubular intake does not weigh 8 lbs.

I actually may have been a little off. I know a handful of them are in the 40 lb range (upper and lower, plus hardware).

A pair of aluminum heads weighed 60 lbs for me. The irons were just over 100 lbs for me as well.
Click to expand...

Those Iron head are massive, they weigh almost as much as the block....
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,932
224
Massachusetts
Jun 19, 2008
#18
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #18
Plastic intakes are a new(er) trend. They didn't really appear until 1992 on Ford's and not until very recently on a lot of other cars.


Ford used AL on the 5.0 because it was the cheapest means to mass produce a complex intake. That's about the only reason. Sacrifice some engineering potential for the almightly buck.

If a pushrod engine were designed today by ford, it might have a composite intake. The LS6 does doesn't it?

Today's technology allows such things to be done, but 20 years ago, sand-cast aluminum intakes were the technology of the day

If an aftermarket supplier wants to put the R&D into a composite "long-runner" style intake, then they might have something. But they will also need to price it high to offset the initial capital expenditure to research and design a working composite 5.0 long-runner intake.
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
new york
Jun 19, 2008
#19
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #19
A GT40 tubular intake upper (plenum) weighs in 8-10lbs, I never stated the lower and all the hardware.

5spd GT said:
A GT40 Tubular intake does not weigh 8 lbs.

I actually may have been a little off. I know a handful of them are in the 40 lb range (upper and lower, plus hardware).

A pair of aluminum heads weighed 60 lbs for me. The irons were just over 100 lbs for me as well.
Click to expand...
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
new york
Jun 19, 2008
#20
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #20
Not the fake one-explorer thats heavy as ****. Even my old original 93 cobra was heavy!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Re-torquing intake manifold bolts question
  • 91GTstroked
  • Feb 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 1, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
J
  • Locked
SOLD 93 cobra intake manifold
  • Jimmer009
  • Jan 19, 2025
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
3
Views
464
Engine and Power Adder Jan 22, 2025
Jimmer009
J
B
Saying Hi
  • BriansNSane
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
289
The Welcome Wagon Dec 21, 2025
BriansNSane
B
ACT sensor in plastic charge pipe
  • 92Rustang
  • Jul 23, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 31, 2024
92Rustang
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?