• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Why Aluminum Intake Manifolds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackstangt
  • Start date Start date Jun 19, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Jun 19, 2008
#21
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #21
Mustang5L5 said:
Plastic intakes are a new(er) trend. They didn't really appear until 1992 on Ford's and not until very recently on a lot of other cars.


Ford used AL on the 5.0 because it was the cheapest means to mass produce a complex intake. That's about the only reason. Sacrifice some engineering potential for the almightly buck.

If a pushrod engine were designed today by ford, it might have a composite intake. The LS6 does doesn't it?

Today's technology allows such things to be done, but 20 years ago, sand-cast aluminum intakes were the technology of the day

If an aftermarket supplier wants to put the R&D into a composite "long-runner" style intake, then they might have something. But they will also need to price it high to offset the initial capital expenditure to research and design a working composite 5.0 long-runner intake.
Click to expand...

Ok, But the intake would be cheaper to make and lighter/better than current manifolds. When edelbrock makes new intake manifolds, they have to design them, how has this cost changed?
 

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Jun 19, 2008
#22
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #22
monte87 said:
Not the fake one-explorer thats heavy as ****. Even my old original 93 cobra was heavy!
Click to expand...

well, that's what I was saying about the GT-40, it has some advantages due to lighter weight and less heat energy storage...
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,259
17,943
224
Massachusetts
Jun 19, 2008
#23
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #23
blackstangt said:
Ok, But the intake would be cheaper to make and lighter/better than current manifolds. When edelbrock makes new intake manifolds, they have to design them, how has this cost changed?
Click to expand...


Maybe they aren't set up to do composites?

They've been doing AL for a long time, maybe they don't see the justification to purchasing the equipment to do composites when they do perfectly fine with AL castings?
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Jun 19, 2008
#24
  • Jun 19, 2008
  • #24
Having hoisted the cast iron 2v carbed intake off and back onto my 77 F150 with its 400M, I think aluminum is a much better choice. That mother must have weighed 75 lbs.

Its probably used because it is easier to cast than iron, stable at its intended operating temperatures, and has adequate heat dissipation qualities to work with wet gasoline and air mixtures. Oh, and it does not catch fire. That was important in the days of carburetors!
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jun 20, 2008
#25
  • Jun 20, 2008
  • #25
Mustang5L5 said:
Plastic intakes are a new(er) trend. They didn't really appear until 1992 on Ford's and not until very recently on a lot of other cars.


Ford used AL on the 5.0 because it was the cheapest means to mass produce a complex intake. That's about the only reason. Sacrifice some engineering potential for the almightly buck.

If a pushrod engine were designed today by ford, it might have a composite intake. The LS6 does doesn't it?

Today's technology allows such things to be done, but 20 years ago, sand-cast aluminum intakes were the technology of the day

If an aftermarket supplier wants to put the R&D into a composite "long-runner" style intake, then they might have something. But they will also need to price it high to offset the initial capital expenditure to research and design a working composite 5.0 long-runner intake.
Click to expand...

That intake is the high-temp plastic composite as well. The Ls1 and Ls6 intakes are virtually identical!

Edelbrock probably does not want to put forth the cost of new compression molding machines, if I had to take a guess.

Plastic also has less casting flash.

The Ls1 intake I cut open is smooth as a baby's... I got some figures out of it...
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Jun 20, 2008
#26
  • Jun 20, 2008
  • #26
86bluecobra said:
just run nitrous and you will never have to worry about your intake being hot. My intake is Ice cold after a blast down the track on the giggle gas.
Click to expand...

you have a point engines run hot, because gas burns too hot.
My Intake feels cold! Heat soak never happens with ethanol. I use a small Honda radiator to make room for a radiator sized inner cooler. Even with a small radiator It takes a little time to get to 180
 

rj95svt

Member
Jan 11, 2007
422
0
16
Hayden, AL
Jun 20, 2008
#27
  • Jun 20, 2008
  • #27
FAST has the technology to produce composite intakes. They already make a LSX intake and I know they have shown a aftermarket 3V modular intake at SEMA I think. It would be nice if they would step up and design a composite 5.0 intake using newer style long runner intake designs.
 
8

86bluecobra

Advanced Member
Dec 20, 2004
4,265
12
69
B.C. Canada
Jun 20, 2008
#28
  • Jun 20, 2008
  • #28
blackstangt said:
It wouldn't warp if made properly, as far as removing heat, buy a better radiator if you need to, that's what it's for. The intake manifold doesn't compare to the cooling capacity of the radiator.
Click to expand...

True enough.
 

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Jun 23, 2008
#29
  • Jun 23, 2008
  • #29
rj95svt said:
FAST has the technology to produce composite intakes. They already make a LSX intake and I know they have shown a aftermarket 3V modular intake at SEMA I think. It would be nice if they would step up and design a composite 5.0 intake using newer style long runner intake designs.
Click to expand...

That's pretty much what I'm looking for, I would think they could sell more 5.0 intakes than just about any other car...
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jun 23, 2008
#30
  • Jun 23, 2008
  • #30
I read recently how an aluminum intake (over composite) will help with the wave tuning and retains it.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jun 23, 2008
#31
  • Jun 23, 2008
  • #31
I imagine that when dealing with resonant energies, the composite still has a little more "give" to it and some of the pulse energy is lost to heat in the plastic.

Mustang5L5 said:
Maybe they aren't set up to do composites?

They've been doing AL for a long time, maybe they don't see the justification to purchasing the equipment to do composites when they do perfectly fine with AL castings?
Click to expand...

Edelbrock also caters to a wide variety of gearheads. Cast intakes offer a lot more freedom when it comes to porting and welding.

Sicarius428 said:
The Ford FE is a perfect example of the intake is designed into the integrity of the block and I would imagine that all of the engines of that era have some sort of design where the intake manifold helped the motor from splitting.
Click to expand...

The FE's intake doesn't contribute to block strength any more than a 5.0's. It still bolts only to the heads like just about every other American gasoline V8 made in the last 60 years.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Jun 23, 2008
#32
  • Jun 23, 2008
  • #32
The FE heads are smaller thus integrating the intake to the heads. The pushrods actually go throught the intake and not the heads. Another dead giveaway is that the bolts from the intake go 90 degrees to the head to intake surface and not vertically like most other V8s...
http://maddogtrucks.com/wp-content/images/motor/edel-2.jpg
Granted the FE is a special case but a lot of people on fordfe.com opt not to go for an aluminium intake and port the cast because of it's strengths and expansion rate.
Kevin
 
S

sjd302

New Member
May 11, 2008
11
0
0
Jun 23, 2008
#33
  • Jun 23, 2008
  • #33
i think the phenolic spacer works good. before i had one on , i couldnt put my hand on the the upper manifold after a drive . w/ the spacer i have no problem keeping my hand on it for a long while. i have the cobra intake. people w/ the stock ho manifold it gets heated by the egr coolant lines also
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jun 23, 2008
#34
  • Jun 23, 2008
  • #34
Sicarius428 said:
The FE heads are smaller thus integrating the intake to the heads. The pushrods actually go throught the intake and not the heads. Another dead giveaway is that the bolts from the intake go 90 degrees to the head to intake surface and not vertically like most other V8s...
http://maddogtrucks.com/wp-content/images/motor/edel-2.jpg
Granted the FE is a special case but a lot of people on fordfe.com opt not to go for an aluminium intake and port the cast because of it's strengths and expansion rate.
Kevin
Click to expand...

Yeah the heads are small, but the intake is not actually "integrated" with the head. The only real difference is that the valve covers cover part of and bolt onto the intake manifold. There is nothing strength-increasing about that. 351 Clevelands, 351Ms, 400s, and 429/460s also use some intake bolts that are vertical and some that are angled directly into the head. Clevelands either balloon a cylinder like the FEs or pull out the mains like a 351W. If the intake bolted to the block as well as the head, I might find it plausible as a stressed member of the engine assembly. Since it doesn't do that, There is still, in my opinion, too much movement allowed for the intake to actually prevent a Ford block from cracking.

Then there is the argument of whether or not blocks split from the mains-up or from the valley-down.
 

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Jun 30, 2008
#35
  • Jun 30, 2008
  • #35
Still, a composite upper intake manifold could not weaken the overall assembly. Does anyone know of such a manifold?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Re-torquing intake manifold bolts question
  • 91GTstroked
  • Feb 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 1, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
128
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
J
  • Locked
SOLD 93 cobra intake manifold
  • Jimmer009
  • Jan 19, 2025
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
3
Views
470
Engine and Power Adder Jan 22, 2025
Jimmer009
J
B
Saying Hi
  • BriansNSane
  • Dec 20, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
291
The Welcome Wagon Dec 21, 2025
BriansNSane
B
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?