Why arent there many 3" exhausts for mod mustangs???
hey guys, the thread "Weld-in flows vs. CatBacks" got me thinking.....
I grew up around f-bodies. all my cousins have em (im the rebel of the family.lol. and the joke, but anyway...) they all have 3.25"+ pipes on em. it looks straight up mean. i think i can fit one of my old cats in one of their tail pipes. the popular pipes used on mustangs are around 2.5....why???
the only thing i could think of is that f-bods dont have true duel exhausts (if you never seen it, after the mannifolds, it has a Y pipe and a single pipe all the way back to the muffler where it splits again). but wouldnt mustangs benifit from bigger pipes. would it not be enough backpressure? I dont realy get it. i thought backpressure was bad, at what point is it too little for the engine to make power? since when did "bigger is better" stop being true?
hey guys, the thread "Weld-in flows vs. CatBacks" got me thinking.....
I grew up around f-bodies. all my cousins have em (im the rebel of the family.lol. and the joke, but anyway...) they all have 3.25"+ pipes on em. it looks straight up mean. i think i can fit one of my old cats in one of their tail pipes. the popular pipes used on mustangs are around 2.5....why???
the only thing i could think of is that f-bods dont have true duel exhausts (if you never seen it, after the mannifolds, it has a Y pipe and a single pipe all the way back to the muffler where it splits again). but wouldnt mustangs benifit from bigger pipes. would it not be enough backpressure? I dont realy get it. i thought backpressure was bad, at what point is it too little for the engine to make power? since when did "bigger is better" stop being true?
