• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

why is a 4.6 car better? help me make up my mind. lol

  • Thread starter Thread starter BK_CAULEY
  • Start date Start date Jan 31, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jun 10, 2009
#21
  • Jun 10, 2009
  • #21
bditty50 said:
I disagree my last fox would out handle any worth sn95. It had 4 wheel disk brakes with power slot rotors and a full MM suspension. It was also very comfortable and the ride was amazing. If you want a sn95 and a fox just buy a fox and put everything from a sn95 car. Then you would have a pretty nice car.
Click to expand...

Silliest argument ever.

The SN95 from every technical aspect is the better car...hands down. The fact that you've got to pirate parts from the SN95 and do a complete overhaul of the factory suspension on the Fox and replace it with aftermarket components just to meet or beat one proves as much.

Fox's have their place, but they've got their limits too. Some of you guys still seem to be having a hard time with bluring the lines on this?
 

1low03gt

20+ Year Stangneter
May 24, 2004
708
11
38
Cold Hell,Ontario,Canada!!
Jun 10, 2009
#22
  • Jun 10, 2009
  • #22
I've had both,each for 6 years,and i will not go back to a fox,the only things i miss from the fox chassis is the amount of room you have in the engine bay with the 5.0L,and the trunk space from the hatchback,other then that,i really love my new edge.
One of my fav's is still the 4 eyed '85 GT since i had one,but there is no comparison to the SN chassis.
But regardless,they both have there place in history,and served there purpose in the mustangs life span,and with every new model that comes out(if we like them or not),it has been in the right step in the right direction for performance,and comfort.It's alive,and kicking harder then ever,how many brand names can say that!
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Jun 11, 2009
#23
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #23
bditty50 said:
I disagree my last fox would out handle any worth sn95. It had 4 wheel disk brakes with power slot rotors and a full MM suspension. It was also very comfortable and the ride was amazing. If you want a sn95 and a fox just buy a fox and put everything from a sn95 car. Then you would have a pretty nice car.
Click to expand...

IMO...no fox rides amazing. I've had tons of fox bodies with different suspensions. They all sucked. The ride of a 94-98 is much better than a fox, and the ride of a 99-04 is even better than a 94-98.


This arguement is gonna go on for pages and pages. The 5.0 was an awesome engine. But lets face it, it's gone now. Ford went with the 4.6L in the Mustang in 1996. Performance enthusiasts were pist. First, the name "5.0" is gone. Second, they didn't like the fact that it was replaced by a smaller 4.6. Then they rode, test drove, or bought the new Mustang with the new 4.6 and they realized how slow and pathetic it was.

In 1999 they got the PI upper half. Now with 260HP people kind of stopped complaining because this is more horse than any 5.0 had. Sales started to pick up again once the 4.6 gained more horsepower. People might still be scared of them since the 96-98's were so unimpressive. Others might have stayed away because technology took over with this motor when compared to a 5.0. They didn't know how to work on it, they didn't know how to mod it, there were little mods for it at the time.

In 2005 it got 300HP. IMO...the 4.6L should have always had 300HP out of the gate.....and now 2010+ SHOULD BE all 400HP.

I like both engines, I don't have a problem with either. I prefer a 4.6L engine nowadays since I've had a couple pretty stout ones. Obviously I like the 4V since I have an 04 Cobra, and just got rid of a 96 Cobra with a 4V. Simply bolting superchargers on 4.6L's add a lot of horsepower and that's why I like them.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Jun 11, 2009
#24
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #24
Trade for a used Terminator.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Jun 11, 2009
#25
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #25
CatmanJJ said:
Trade for a used Terminator.
Click to expand...

Now we're thinking with our heads straight!!!!
 

95Vert383AOD

15 Year Member
Jun 10, 2008
1,133
34
69
New Bedford, MA
Jun 11, 2009
#26
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #26
And this is why i bought a 95 mustang and did a 351 swap

SN-95 Chassis with the ability to toss any motor i please in!!!

Chris
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,260
17,945
224
Massachusetts
Jun 11, 2009
#27
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #27
If my 5.0 wasn't my first car I EVER owned...i would have sold it and be driving a nice SN95 Saleen, Mach1 or Terminator.

In terms of what *I* consider better, the SN95 always wins, however when it came time to choose between selling ym '03GT, or my '88LX...i sold the GT because of my attachment to the 5.0

Granted...i've modded the HELL out of my 5.0m redid basically everything. Some of the guys who frequent the 5.0 forums have seen the work I am putting into the car...but still, there are days i wish i could fire up my nice new shiny GT with its tight rattle free interior and rev that smooth silky 4.6L and go take it for a ride.

But then i do love the fact that when i do drive my 5.0...it's the only one on the road pretty much. I see 10 SN95's a day!
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Jun 11, 2009
#28
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #28
I had a 4.6L motor in a fox last year, which I guess I had the best of both worlds in one car.
 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Jun 11, 2009
#29
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #29
SVT32VDOHC said:
I had a 4.6L motor in a fox last year, which I guess I had the best of both worlds in one car.
Click to expand...

You beat me to it.

My Mach 1 made 306RWHP with a K&N, Bassani Mid Lengths, catted X and a tune. Get a Mach 1 longblock with the stock 3650 and you have a 12 second (on street tires) capable car or high 11's on slicks without even getting into the engine. Drop that into a 4cyl coupe and away you go.

Bill
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Jun 11, 2009
#30
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #30
Mustang92 said:
You beat me to it.

My Mach 1 made 306RWHP with a K&N, Bassani Mid Lengths, catted X and a tune. Get a Mach 1 longblock with the stock 3650 and you have a 12 second (on street tires) capable car or high 11's on slicks without even getting into the engine. Drop that into a 4cyl coupe and away you go.

Bill
Click to expand...

Damn Bill. I had no idea you sold your old blue GT! I remember learning from your threads years ago when I joined the forum and you were working on your car... back in the days when a Steeda timing adjuster was a common mod!

A supercharged Mach is a good choice! Pics!?!?!?!?!
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jun 11, 2009
#31
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #31
As others said, the 4.6 is a much tighter car, with modern brakes and suspension. Compared to a 5.0, the 4.6 is much smoother.
Just as others said, if you want a toy, keep the 5.0. It's cheaper and you'll have more fun for your $. If you want something to drive daily, get the 4.6. Just as my signature says, I have a fox for a toy (though not a 5.0) and daily drive a 4.6.
 

GroverDill

GoldMember
Founding Member
Aug 18, 1999
5,442
1,490
214
Demotte IN 46310
Jun 11, 2009
#32
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #32
68stang351 said:
I say if you want a daily, go with the SN, if you want a hot rod go with the fox.
Click to expand...


I agree 100%
 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Jun 11, 2009
#33
  • Jun 11, 2009
  • #33
007 said:
Damn Bill. I had no idea you sold your old blue GT! I remember learning from your threads years ago when I joined the forum and you were working on your car... back in the days when a Steeda timing adjuster was a common mod!

A supercharged Mach is a good choice! Pics!?!?!?!?!
Click to expand...

Yep those were the good old days. I sold the car so I could afford my house. Took a few years off and got the Mach 1. I've had it for 14 months and I'm on my third combo. http://forums.stangnet.com/786271-mach-1-eaton-swap.html

Bill
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
C
For Sale FOR SALE ENTIRE CAR
  • cptcrunch93
  • Jun 13, 2023
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
2
Views
2K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jun 13, 2023
cptcrunch93
C
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Engine Backfiring and Shaking Pony
  • Krazykyle44
  • Mar 15, 2021
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 17, 2021
General karthief
J
Firing up a dream mustang...
  • John1996
  • May 10, 2019
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
917
The Welcome Wagon May 12, 2019
Adieu
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?