• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

why no holleys?

  • Thread starter Thread starter droptopford 5 0
  • Start date Start date Feb 4, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

droptopford 5 0

Member
Mar 31, 2005
427
0
17
Feb 4, 2007
#1
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #1
why does it seem like few people on here run the holley intake compared to cobra/trick flow/ and edelbrock? is there any real disadvantage when looking at it for an initial upgrade with stock heads/ cam, and looking for a 300 rwhp h/c/i set-up later? the only real reason i dont care much for trickflow and edelbrock is i dont care much for the finishes they offer, and the holleys look pretty sharp unfinished/polished... plus u dont see them everyday around here. any thoughts on power they make compared to the others?
 

DDSTANG94

New Member
Dec 9, 2006
465
2
0
FRASER, MICHIGAN
Feb 4, 2007
#2
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #2
I heard there a larger intake and its not that good for mild street heads and cam becuse you'll loose low end punch
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Feb 4, 2007
#3
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #3
i know they are sexy intakes and i would love to get the h/c/i kit they offer i think it would be a great addition to a 347...but i gotta watch how much im spending!! lol
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Feb 4, 2007
#4
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #4
It's a little taller and doesn't fit under the stock hood very well.

Like stated before the ports are larger and shorter so its a little much for a mild 302 combo, unless you rev it up!

I've run the Performer, and Performer RPM. I did loose some low end torque, but I gained up top. The rpm's that I lost torque at, I'll never see on the dragstrip.

It's an awesome intake, everyone is using it in NMRA pure street and Renegade
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Feb 4, 2007
#5
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #5
Double Post
 

droptopford 5 0

Member
Mar 31, 2005
427
0
17
Feb 4, 2007
#6
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #6
crap, its a sick intake... what intake comes with the holley systemax hci kit? its only rated for 350 BHP so why would they put suck a high revving intake with parts designed for a mild set-up... compatible with an otherwise stock 302?
 

The Hitman

Founding Member
Oct 17, 2001
2,541
0
0
Orlando, FL
Feb 5, 2007
#7
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #7
I've heard they are great for Forced Induction apps. due to the big ports. I don't know anyone that has one though.
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Feb 5, 2007
#8
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #8
the ports on the holley are huge compared to the performer rpm. the size of the lower ports line up almost perfectly with the intake ports on the fr 185's. it is definitely not the intake to run on an n/a 302. that is the intake i run on my blown 331.

 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 5, 2007
#9
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #9
The Holly Kit has been around for years

When it first came out ...........

The reviews were not favorable to .............
OEM untouched short block based N A Street Car applications

As others have said ................
Intake ports too large
and
Some said the cam was too aggressive for a mild 302 h/c/i combo

You gotta be movin lotta air to use that intake

Grady
 

droptopford 5 0

Member
Mar 31, 2005
427
0
17
Feb 5, 2007
#10
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #10
well, looks like i have 2 options... wuss ou and get a smaller intake, or step up my goals with enough power to split my block no, in all reality ill just get another intake, and i meant no offense to anyone by calling the other intakes wussy, its all relative to the set-up. whats the finish on the holley? and is there any other way to get that polished, but not chromed look on any of the other tried and true intakes? i know you can get a "natural" finish on the trick flow, but that would take me a lot of work to keep clean, and i just dont think i could go polish something that big without more experience already...i'd be afraid i wouldnt like the way it came out. plus with a job and college, i wouldnt have enough time until summer
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Feb 5, 2007
#11
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #11
well.....i have a 1000hp capable rotating assembly in a 500hp capable block. the dart block would have been great but i couldnt justify another $2000 for the dart block at the time i bought my motor.
 

droptopford 5 0

Member
Mar 31, 2005
427
0
17
Feb 7, 2007
#12
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #12
ya, i think my budget restricts me to keeping the stock block
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Feb 7, 2007
#13
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #13
i dont know of any other manufacturer that offers a polished intake...looks like its goin gto cost you some elbow grease...
 

donkey_punch

New Member
Jan 16, 2004
565
0
0
northern****ingjersey
Feb 7, 2007
#14
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #14
trav_19 said:
i dont know of any other manufacturer that offers a polished intake...looks like its goin gto cost you some elbow grease...
Click to expand...


you can get a typhoon intake polished from professional products
 

95snoozer

Active Member
Dec 14, 2002
2,572
1
48
RCR
Feb 7, 2007
#15
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #15
Answer: because they are scared to make power

run a cam that revs to 6500 and a set of heads that breath and you will make 330+ with that intake
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Feb 7, 2007
#16
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #16
Badlilstang made 371hp with AFR185s, a Holley SysteMax II, and a FTI cam

 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Feb 7, 2007
#17
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #17
The intake ports on the Holley are huge. They fit on the AFR 185's fine but when matching the Edelbrock lower on them I would have needed a major port job.

The Holley intake is the reason why Justin Timberlake named his new CD like that.

 

Attachments

  • Motor12-29-05.webp
    47.6 KB · Views: 126

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Feb 7, 2007
#18
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #18
Mine also dwarfed my ported Edle RPM


 

Yobi1Kanobi

Member
Apr 9, 2003
559
0
16
Feb 7, 2007
#19
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #19
how are the port in comparison to the TFS R? anybody seen those two....
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Feb 7, 2007
#20
  • Feb 7, 2007
  • #20
I would give the "R" the edge it is a "race intake" with no PCV etc

The Holley isnt that radical
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
284
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
J
68 Mustang with Foxbody Engine Stalling Issues - MSPNP2
  • JayV68Stang
  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
469
Digital Self-tuning Forum Mar 13, 2025
JayV68Stang
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?