• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Widdest tire in the back?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95_5.0_stang
  • Start date Start date Nov 1, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
9

95_5.0_stang

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
172
0
0
Lansing, MI.
Nov 1, 2005
#1
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #1
Ok, well I was looking into the 10.5 inch wide rear bullitt rims....will 265 (10.6 inch wide) tires fit in the rear of a 95' stang that has a 88' 8.8 rear axle in it without it rubbing. ( I did 5 lug swap to it)? Thanks!
 

LethalInjection

Founding Member
Jul 26, 2002
217
0
17
Arkansas
Nov 1, 2005
#2
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #2
I have 265's on the back of my 95 on my 15x8 prostars. I think you can get a 315 or possible 325 on the back of these with the right backspacing..
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Nov 1, 2005
#3
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #3
17's or 18's?

I run a 315x35x17 rear tire on 17x11 rims I had to flip the quad shocks so they would fit.

The reason I ask if the rims are 17' or 18's is there is an issue with the inside fender as far as clearance goes. The added hight of the 18s makes this more of an issue as it puts you closer to this fender sooner than the with the 17's. You can beat on it with a BFHammer and gain some room...with a 17in rim and some beating in this area with no quads I would think 325-335's "might...might" fit on a 17in rim.
 
M

miller92063

Member
Oct 12, 2005
253
0
16
Nebraska
Nov 1, 2005
#4
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #4
if you have aftermarket upper lower control arms or even new spring you can ditch the quads
 
9

95_5.0_stang

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
172
0
0
Lansing, MI.
Nov 1, 2005
#5
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #5
Stock suspension setup for now. 17 inch rims. So 265's should fit easily then with no modifications? Since you guys are saying that your cramming 3xx in there.
 

stprorolla49

Active Member
Oct 9, 2004
1,455
15
39
Fairfield, CT/North Jersey
Nov 1, 2005
#6
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #6
95_5.0_stang said:
Stock suspension setup for now. 17 inch rims. So 265's should fit easily then with no modifications? Since you guys are saying that your cramming 3xx in there.
Click to expand...
with a 315 on a 10.5" wide rim, you dont even have to do anything to the quads, or flip em......
 
9

95_5.0_stang

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
172
0
0
Lansing, MI.
Nov 1, 2005
#7
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #7
Damn, so I can go all the way up to a 315 huh....Mmmm.:Teh-Win: Also, what sidewall number do you guys recommend?
 

xr8d302

I bought a 27" monitor to compensate for my lack o
Apr 29, 2004
1,113
0
36
Medicine Hat, AB
Nov 1, 2005
#8
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #8
I don't know if i'd even attempt a 265 on a 10.5 inch wheel. I think you'd be looking at a very funny looking wheel. Minimum 295 on a wheel that wide. But go 315, for the look cool factor
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Nov 1, 2005
#9
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #9
gen. the 315 runs in a 35 sidewall...as the tire marks read...315-35-17
 
9

95_5.0_stang

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
172
0
0
Lansing, MI.
Nov 1, 2005
#10
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #10
Ok, what about the fronts. The 9 inch wide rims (still 17 inch rim). Full specs on what tire I should get. Thanks a lot guys!
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Nov 1, 2005
#11
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #11
I have 17x9 rims in the front and 275-40-17 tires on them...they are alittle too wide if you ask me...when these wear down I hope to get some 255-265's for the front.

The tire with a 275 is just a tad too wide and ever so slightly sticks out from the front fender...not much you realy have to look at it but I dont like it. Also the wide tire plays havoc with my align. and the roads around here SUCK (Missouri has like the 49th worst roads in the US) the wide front tires "catch" on the un-even surface and "wonder" on this un-even surface.
 
9

95_5.0_stang

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
172
0
0
Lansing, MI.
Nov 1, 2005
#12
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #12
Ok cool, thanks a lot man. You guys were a huge help. Especially with the quick replys.
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Nov 1, 2005
#13
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #13
IMO, yeah, 275's are a hair too wide on a 17x9. I run 255's on mine ..... & think it is a hair too narrow. This leads me to believe a 265 tire is the perfect size for a 17x9 up front.


And on a 10.5" wheel .... you DO NOT wnat to put a 265 on there! That would look really wierd ..... not to mention that if you curbed it on accident .... your wheel would DEFINITELY take some damage. Go 315 or 325.
 
9

95_5.0_stang

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
172
0
0
Lansing, MI.
Nov 1, 2005
#14
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #14
Ahhh....stuck between 255 or 265 on front....?? I don't want them to stick out of the fender.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Nov 1, 2005
#15
  • Nov 1, 2005
  • #15
1. the "widest tire" subject has been covered at least 100 times in the last year.

2. 255s in front
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Nov 2, 2005
#16
  • Nov 2, 2005
  • #16
Well, it must be the different tire brands. I know my 255's are too narrow for the 17x9's. And they do not stick out of the fender wells.

Kinda like the Goodyear Eagle F1 315's will actually be "wider" than the Nitto 315's. It depends on brands. I'm definitely going with 265's my next time around.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Nov 2, 2005
#17
  • Nov 2, 2005
  • #17
BlackVert said:
1. the "widest tire" subject has been covered at least 100 times in the last year.

2. 255s in front
Click to expand...
 

95COBRA241

New Member
Sep 3, 2005
339
0
0
Delray Beach, FL
Nov 2, 2005
#18
  • Nov 2, 2005
  • #18
To answer your ?, IMO a 265mm tire is too narrow for a 10.5" rim.
 

Nik_95Cobra

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
1,677
1
37
Tempe, Arizona
Nov 2, 2005
#19
  • Nov 2, 2005
  • #19
I run 315's out back and 255's up front, the sizing couldn't fit better IMO. There is a guy on the Corral running 335's for his rears with minimal rubbing.
 
9

95_5.0_stang

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
172
0
0
Lansing, MI.
Nov 2, 2005
#20
  • Nov 2, 2005
  • #20
Nik_95Cobra said:
I run 315's out back and 255's up front, the sizing couldn't fit better IMO. There is a guy on the Corral running 335's for his rears with minimal rubbing.
Click to expand...

Ok, sounds good. That's what I plan on running. 315's back and 255's front.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Tire size question 1986 gt hatchback
  • B0udreaux
  • Jan 12, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
562
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 17, 2026
B0udreaux
B
6
Tires
  • 65er
  • Dec 18, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
340
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
Realmongo
P
Fox 17" Deep Dish Bullitts on Rear of Fox, 275/40/17?
  • pindude80
  • May 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
716
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 4, 2025
Noobz347
O
SOLD FS: 18" FR500 chrome wheels and Toyo tires
  • optionizerSS
  • May 21, 2026
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
1
Views
89
Other Classifieds Jun 2, 2026
optionizerSS
O
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
513
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 28, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?