• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Will stiffer valvesprings eat hp?

  • Thread starter Thread starter crazypete
  • Start date Start date Aug 12, 2005

crazypete

All my crevices are greased.
Oct 22, 2004
930
4
18
Arlington, MA
Aug 12, 2005
#1
  • Aug 12, 2005
  • #1
I just finished ordering an FTI cam and it calls for 200 lb seat pressure double springs in leiu of my stock 120 pounders. How much does valvetrain spring rate affect parasitic loss? I would think this would be noticable if I just dropped in the springs lets say without the cam in question and took a before and after.
 
8

8950HO

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
658
2
0
Aug 12, 2005
#2
  • Aug 12, 2005
  • #2
crazypete said:
I just finished ordering an FTI cam and it calls for 200 lb seat pressure double springs in leiu of my stock 120 pounders. How much does valvetrain spring rate affect parasitic loss? I would think this would be noticable if I just dropped in the springs lets say without the cam in question and took a before and after.
Click to expand...

I`m pretty sure I recall reading on the Crane Cams website a while back that they said stiffer valve springs do not cause any parasitic HP loss,because when the engine is running different valves are in the process of opening and closing and this somehow evens/balances things out resulting in no HP loss.

Check the Crane site.I think the info was somewhere in their valve spring catalog.
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Aug 12, 2005
#3
  • Aug 12, 2005
  • #3
8950HO said:
I`m pretty sure I recall reading on the Crane Cams website a while back that they said stiffer valve springs do not cause any parasitic HP loss,because when the engine is running different valves are in the process of opening and closing and this somehow evens/balances things out resulting in no HP loss.

Check the Crane site.I think the info was somewhere in their valve spring catalog.
Click to expand...

I have not seen the Crane site, but that is contrary to everything I have learned about physics. As the weight force of an object increases, so does the friction. This is how pushing harder on the brakes creates increasing deceleration, and how shifting the weight to the back tires on a launch provides better traction. Again I have not seen the Crane site (Comp Cams all the way!!!!), but that comment does not sound right.

There will be an increase in parasitic losses, but if you choose the right cam, the power gained will far surpass what was lost.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Aug 12, 2005
#4
  • Aug 12, 2005
  • #4
You NEED springs for two things.. to keep the lifter on the cam lobe and to stop the valve from bouncing on the seat when closed.. Not enough pressure will cause both problems.. Does valve float come to mind?? IF a cam grinder calls for so much pressure.. you NEED that much pressure... and I think STOCK is on hell of less than 120 Lbs installed?? Cool??

Just me.........................

Thumper
 

QDRHRSE

New Member
Dec 31, 2002
1,590
0
0
Palmdale, CA
Aug 12, 2005
#5
  • Aug 12, 2005
  • #5
Theoretically they should but I don't think its a huge amount of power. In fact I've never even thought about it.
 
G

gork1rogues

New Member
Oct 2, 2003
42
0
0
Aug 12, 2005
#6
  • Aug 12, 2005
  • #6
You'll lose more hp with a banged up cam and not-so-round lifter rollers.
 
M

mr.b

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2002
214
0
0
Aug 12, 2005
#7
  • Aug 12, 2005
  • #7
go to reher morrison's website. They have done dyno testing and talk about have they have never seen a loss of horsepower from stiff valvesprings, but have seen a loss of horsepower from not enough spring (valve float).
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Aug 12, 2005
#8
  • Aug 12, 2005
  • #8
valve springs store energy when compressed(valve opening), and release it when decompressed(valve closing). The only energy (or horsepower in this case) lost during the cycle is in the form of heat from friction at the molecular level within the spring. Isn't physics great?
 

Car RamRod

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
623
0
0
Queens, NYC
Aug 12, 2005
#9
  • Aug 12, 2005
  • #9
gork1rogues said:
You'll lose more hp with a banged up cam and not-so-round lifter rollers.
Click to expand...

That seems like putting extra stress on the cam and lifters for nothing to me.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Aug 12, 2005
#10
  • Aug 12, 2005
  • #10
More pressure = more friction. The rest balances itself out due to one valve closing while another one opens.

Of course too little pressure allowing the valves to float will most likley result in less hp. Floating a valve isn't a way to get more durration on a small cam. I guess too much seat pressure would defeat the purpose and only leave more friction.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Aug 12, 2005
#11
  • Aug 12, 2005
  • #11
What kinda combo is this with that much spring pressure? Is this a solid roller spring/cam combo?
 

crazypete

All my crevices are greased.
Oct 22, 2004
930
4
18
Arlington, MA
Aug 15, 2005
#12
  • Aug 15, 2005
  • #12
Sorry for steping away from my own thread. Man just wants to turn some wrenches then life happens, you know?

It's an FTI custom hydraulic roller cam with oooooodles of lift designed to work with 1.7 roller rockers. I asked for a low rpm torquer. The 120 pounders were the AFR 1472 box stock springs. It's gonna be fun trying to compress these things to get them on.

It didnt occur to me the balance of it, I was just thinking of the opening of something with such pressure but didnt occur to me that something is pushing up on the other end of the cam at the same time.

This is my "first cam" so I have a lot of questions running through my mind.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
790
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
496
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Engine Valvetrain help please!!
  • sams93gt
  • Jun 23, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2020
sams93gt
E
For Sale 1989 LX Notch 410ci 85mm turbo 8 pt cage 9" rear end
  • EightyNineFive
  • Aug 22, 2021
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
4K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 18, 2022
Freakinstang
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?