@Phdiesel
And just because I'm in a the mood to drive home how wrong you are because of the way you are addressing some very well known, knowledgeable, and respected members, here is a little real world test to drive the point home. Took my 2 minutes in my garage.
So here is the exact sensor you are talking about (2-wire, ECT temp sensor from a 5.0, Ford part # DY1145, 1984-1995 mustang). I measured this at room temp which is around 55 degrees in my garage.
Then I reversed the polarity of my test leads on my multimeter. Go figure, the exact same reading! (within measurement tolerance of course)
So then, according to your logic, if I would introduce some heat into the sensor and measure, I should get a drastically different reading when I reverse the polarity of my test leads? Right?
Reverse the test leads, and MAJIC! It reads about the same (sensor continued to soak some heat from the heat gun while I was getting the second measurement). But also notice how the resistance value went down, because it got hotter, just like a NTC thermistor should.
Around here, we treat our members with respect. You'll have to learn you can't assume the attitude of someone by the way you interpret their words online, otherwise you're going to have a really hard time on the internet in general. I have never seen any of those guys that responded to you put down anyone (that didn't absolutely deserve it). And after reading what you copied and posted, I can definitely tell you they were trying to help you and you took it the wrong way. Maybe take a step back and take a deep breath next time and try to approach it in a more civil way.
Exactly, it’s a NTC sensor like I said... the moderator tried to tell me it wasn’t... how about you guys get it right before you start telling me I’m wrong??? It is in fact a NTC sensor... car closed... I am not wrong....@Phdiesel
And just because I'm in a the mood to drive home how wrong you are because of the way you are addressing some very well known, knowledgeable, and respected members, here is a little real world test to drive the point home. Took my 2 minutes in my garage.
So here is the exact sensor you are talking about (2-wire, ECT temp sensor from a 5.0, Ford part # DY1145, 1984-1995 mustang). I measured this at room temp which is around 55 degrees in my garage.
Then I reversed the polarity of my test leads on my multimeter. Go figure, the exact same reading! (within measurement tolerance of course)
So then, according to your logic, if I would introduce some heat into the sensor and measure, I should get a drastically different reading when I reverse the polarity of my test leads? Right?
Reverse the test leads, and MAJIC! It reads about the same (sensor continued to soak some heat from the heat gun while I was getting the second measurement). But also notice how the resistance value went down, because it got hotter, just like a NTC thermistor should.
Around here, we treat our members with respect. You'll have to learn you can't assume the attitude of someone by the way you interpret their words online, otherwise you're going to have a really hard time on the internet in general. I have never seen any of those guys that responded to you put down anyone (that didn't absolutely deserve it). And after reading what you copied and posted, I can definitely tell you they were trying to help you and you took it the wrong way. Maybe take a step back and take a deep breath next time and try to approach it in a more civil way.