In one of the mustang magazines I get they were talking about the granatelli COP generating like 15+ hp from putting them on. They had a motor with the dyno sheets and everything, not sure if it was rwhp or fwhp but it had to deal with the fact that there was like 4-5 times the amount of material in the COP then stock which transferred it.
Agreed, the only pulley change I think is worthwhile is the one on cars with blowers or those who have exhausted every other type of mod. Better exhaust flow helps fuel economy too...why not get exhaust? It makes power, economy AND noise differences. I dunno, there will always be someone who doesn't like pullies and someone who does...i'm one of those who think they're a waste of time/money unless you're starting to exhaust your "affordable mod" options.Pullies suck.
As for the COPs just clean the boots and put some silicone dielectric grease on the spring to plug connection.
What you fail to understand is that we do in fact realize that.What some of you against pulleys fail to understand is that the stock pulleys (not pullies BTW) generate a static parasitic loss on the motor. It is not a percentage of loss that increases with power like drivetrain loss, so the gains from going to underdrive pulleys has absolutely nothing to do with how much power the motor is making at the crank. Static parasitic loss is static parasitic loss. When you lessen that set static parasitic loss with underdrive pulleys, you will gain a specific amount of HP regardless of how much power the motor is making.
So in reality, pulleys are actually a better mod on relatively stock motors.....in regards to seat of the pants realization.
What some of you against pulleys fail to understand is that the stock pulleys (not pullies BTW) generate a static parasitic loss on the motor. It is not a percentage of loss that increases with power like drivetrain loss, so the gains from going to underdrive pulleys has absolutely nothing to do with how much power the motor is making at the crank. Static parasitic loss is static parasitic loss. When you lessen that set static parasitic loss with underdrive pulleys, you will gain a specific amount of HP regardless of how much power the motor is making.
So in reality, pulleys are actually a better mod on relatively stock motors.....in regards to seat of the pants realization.
What you fail to understand is that we do in fact realize that.
You are gonna have to try a lot harder if you want to school us mang
In one of the mustang magazines I get they were talking about the granatelli COP generating like 15+ hp from putting them on. They had a motor with the dyno sheets and everything, not sure if it was rwhp or fwhp but it had to deal with the fact that there was like 4-5 times the amount of material in the COP then stock which transferred it.
So I am stupid and everyone that does not agree with you is a noob? Nice techKilgore, I have read a bunch of your so called tech posts......I wouldn't be talking.
I agree with you jstreet......most if not all of the people that bag on pulleys have no actual experience and/or dyno time with them. I do. They have proven time after time on various dyno's that I have been around to make a decent power gain under the curve (the newbs get caught up with the peak numbers) and increase fuel mileage.
So I am stupid and everyone that does not agree with you is a noob? Nice tech
So I am stupid and everyone that does not agree with you is a noob? Nice tech
yeah, you're right... I stand corrected
This is not tech...
If you're talking about his post then yes thats true
If you're talking about the forum this thread is in, then you're wrong...this is the 4.6 Tech forum...
don't believe everything you read:
whatever the HP #'s advertised in magazines is bogus. here is the formula toget the correct #'s.
take the HP # they print, divide that HP # by 2 and subtract 5 from that HP # and you may get a closer HP # as to what the real # is.
magazines lie, they do this to help the vendor promote and sell the product and in turn helps sell more magazines.
So I am stupid and everyone that does not agree with you is a noob? Nice tech
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?