^ Lol. One cannot possibly bring themselves to own a Mustang II, no matter how hard one may try.
I guess I'm kinda the oddball here. If I could have another 94-95 but have it as light as my nothcback I'd trade. Of course I'd put all the drivetrain and suspension I'm putting on my notch. I personally like the styling of the SN95 body. I love the fact that I can put a set of 315s on the back without having to modify anything, upgrading to Cobra brakes is just a matter of changing caliper brakets, calipers, and rotors, it already has 4 wheel disc brakes and 5-lug wheels and it's little more comfortable ride. It's also more aerodynamic than the fox. Don't get me wrong, I love my foxbodies though. I've own 3 of them(91 GT, 86 GT, 88 notch).
Edit: Found some more--
1989 Mustang GT Convertible: 0.40
1989 Mustang GT: 0.38
2003 Mustang GT: 0.36
2003 Mustang Mach 1: 0.36
1994 Mustang GT: 0.34
1993 Mustang Cobra: 0.34
2003 Mustang V6: 0.33
2005 Chevrolet Corvette C6: 0.28
Haha, I would actually love to own a Mustang II. Nothing about the drivetrain, brakes or suspension would be stock if I owned one, but I love the look of the IIs. I mean, come on- they're actually kind of cool looking.
I dont like the interior plastics of the SN95 cars. I bought my '95 with 62,000 original miles on it, and sold it with 90,000 on it. Needless to say I kept it in great shape, but the interior pieces rattled like no other. I spend as much time fixing rattling plastic then I did on anything else. Now as for the looks of them, dropping them down and putting 10.5" wheels in the back without them sticking out or rubbing on a stock body looks pretty killer to me. That pic of the red SN is a guy named Dan that used to frequent here. His car is so far from stock that you would have to spend a LOT of $$$ to come close to the quality of it, but yes I think they look friggin awesome with a few body mods, wheels, and a drop. I would keep with a '94-'95 personally cause they are just as cheap to mod as a fox being that they also have a pushrod 5.0 and t-5/AOD.
Haha, I would actually love to own a Mustang II. Nothing about the drivetrain, brakes or suspension would be stock if I owned one, but I love the look of the IIs. I mean, come on- they're actually kind of cool looking.
Wow, really? What's weird to me is according to that list the 93 Cobra has a DC of .34 but an 89 GT has .38...they are the same car. I guess the very few parts of the ground effects on the Cobra that are smoothed compared to the GT make that difference. I also guess that comparing a .04 difference is splitting hairsThat depends, the Drag Coefficient of a sn cobra is basicly the same as a hatchback LX http://ecomodder.com/wiki/index.php/Vehicle_Coefficient_of_Drag_List
http://www.stangnet.com/mustang-for...ient-of-any-year-mustang.685526/#post-6715507
Anyway you cut it the Mustang has the DC of a freaking brick rolling down the road. Even the 88 Thunderbird had a lower DC (.35) than the mustang. 92-95 Taurus was .32.
Wow, really? What's weird to me is according to that list the 93 Cobra has a DC of .34 but an 89 GT has .38...they are the same car. I guess the very few parts of the ground effects on the Cobra that are smoothed compared to the GT make that difference. I also guess that comparing a .04 difference is splitting hairs. Like you said a mustang just has a DC of a brick.
A Banana?If i was Mustangless, and you gave me $10K to play with....
This is what I'
Not meIf i was Mustangless, and you gave me $10K to play with....
This is what I'd buy
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?