• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

X2 Joints Necessary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skidawg
  • Start date Start date May 9, 2008

Skidawg

Member
Nov 11, 2003
104
0
16
May 9, 2008
#1
  • May 9, 2008
  • #1
Within the next 10 days or so, I'm swapping out the suspension system. Sportlines, Tokico, CC plates, and a bumpsteer kit.

I was considering picking up some Steeda X2 Ball Joints too. Will I notice the difference if I just keep the stock ones in? I see a lot of guys keep the stock joints in.

Are the X2's necessary, recommended, optional, or not needed?

Thanks
 

Superhereaux

chicks make me feel inadequate
Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
538
3
59
South Texas
May 9, 2008
#2
  • May 9, 2008
  • #2
Might as well


You're buying the bumpsteer kit which will lower the outer tie-rods. You want the tie-rods and lower control arms to be level to each other and the Steeda balljoints will take care of that.

I have them in my car and the added 1/4 inch drop in front was a welcome bonus
 
J

Jbauer

New Member
Jan 20, 2008
506
0
0
May 9, 2008
#3
  • May 9, 2008
  • #3
just 1/4? mine lowered almost an inch, i didn't use the spacer that came with it
 

Superhereaux

chicks make me feel inadequate
Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
538
3
59
South Texas
May 9, 2008
#4
  • May 9, 2008
  • #4
Jbauer said:
just 1/4? mine lowered almost an inch, i didn't use the spacer that came with it
Click to expand...

i didn't use the spacer either. the spacer (which is about 1/4 inch) is used to keep the current height of the car if the owner so wishes.

might depend on the year of the car as well, mines an 'o2
 

EPIK

Member
Jul 3, 2004
796
1
16
LEFT COAST
May 9, 2008
#5
  • May 9, 2008
  • #5
X2's help fix the steering geometry on a lowered car & go hand & hand with a bumpsteer kit...I would say they are worth it.....

Although its cool that it lowers the car more, removing the spacers defeats the purpose of using the X2's.

Quote from steeda....

When a Mustang is lowered, the front roll center changes due to the new
position of the suspension pivot points. Lower the car too much and the
front roll center drops to well below ground level, and worse than that,
the roll center moves side to side as the body rolls, resulting in lost grip
and erratic handling. The lower roll center causes the body to roll more
easily. Countering this tendency usually requires a significant increase in
front spring rate to simply control the added roll due to the lowered the roll
center. This higher spring rate not only hurts ride quality, but it also
reduces grip on rough surfaces, as the stiffer springs cause the tire to skip
over bumps instead of following the contours of the road. The X2 balljoint
was designed to eliminate these problems by correcting the front roll
center geometry. The X2 balljoint has a longer shaft, to raise the spindle
relative to the balljoint pivot point. Spacers for the springs are included in
the X2 kit to maintain the same ride height as a stock balljoint, but with
a much improved roll center height. With the roll center restored to the
proper height, smaller front swaybars and softer springs can be used.
The result is a suspension that works for you to accommodate the small
and large imperfections that are in any road or track, allowing the tires to
stay planted on the ground where they belong.
Click to expand...
 

ErikTheBeast

Member
Apr 12, 2006
124
0
16
Kansas City MO
May 10, 2008
#6
  • May 10, 2008
  • #6
Got them on my GT w/o the spacers , I love the raked look it gives
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
P
Suspension Different height ball joints?
  • pindude80
  • Jun 10, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 12, 2024
limp
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
532
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Progress Thread 87 T-top slow progress
  • wobbyguy
  • Feb 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
692
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 10, 2025
nickyb
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?