• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

yeah boy!!! 13.217 @ 103.31 *Auto*

  • Thread starter Thread starter SonicBlue05GT
  • Start date Start date Nov 10, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last
T

TomServo92

New Member
Dec 22, 2003
517
0
0
Texas
Nov 11, 2004
#41
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #41
Stang8URMPRT said:
Please tell me... What the hell does the "x" mean in MTX or ATX? Automatic Transmission... X??? WTF?
Click to expand...

Those are actually incorrect terms in regards to the Mustang. ATX and MTX refer to Automatic TransaXle and Manual TransaXle respectively. The Mustang, as we all know, does not have a transaxle. ATX/MTX are terms most commonly used in reference to front wheel drive cars.
 
S

Stang2k5

New Member
Oct 22, 2004
187
0
0
Nov 11, 2004
#42
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #42
It seems as though the AT folks argument is that you can be more consitant with a auto and the MT folks believe that given you have the proper skill to master a MT you can be faster than a AT.

Personaly I dont give a crap. I prefer a MT and nothing any AT person says is going to change that. Just remember MT drivers can drive both
 
S

Stang2k5

New Member
Oct 22, 2004
187
0
0
Nov 11, 2004
#43
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #43
TomServo92 said:
Those are actually incorrect terms in regards to the Mustang. ATX and MTX refer to Automatic TransaXle and Manual TransaXle respectively. The Mustang, as we all know, does not have a transaxle. ATX/MTX are terms most commonly used in reference to front wheel drive cars.
Click to expand...

Thank you for that clarification
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Nov 11, 2004
#44
  • Nov 11, 2004
  • #44
Stang2k5 said:
It seems as though the AT folks argument is that you can be more consitant with a auto and the MT folks believe that given you have the proper skill to master a MT you can be faster than a AT.

Personaly I dont give a crap. I prefer a MT and nothing any AT person says is going to change that. Just remember MT drivers can drive both
Click to expand...

theoretically, with both transmissions completely stock, the manual will win if both are driven to their maximum. Of course that's with a 4-speed auto, the new 5-speed narrows the gap but you're still putting more power to the ground in a manual.
 
G

gilmoujr

New Member
Sep 24, 2004
126
0
0
Nov 12, 2004
#45
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #45
TomServo92 said:
Those are actually incorrect terms in regards to the Mustang. ATX and MTX refer to Automatic TransaXle and Manual TransaXle respectively. The Mustang, as we all know, does not have a transaxle. ATX/MTX are terms most commonly used in reference to front wheel drive cars.
Click to expand...
Something that I was thinking was that is is borrowed from Transit(Tx) and Receive (Rx) in the signal/computing world. Some may be confusing "Transmission" (Tx) with the "Transmission" in a car.

 
S

Stang2k5

New Member
Oct 22, 2004
187
0
0
Nov 12, 2004
#46
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #46
FallenPhoenix said:
theoretically, with both transmissions completely stock, the manual will win if both are driven to their maximum. Of course that's with a 4-speed auto, the new 5-speed narrows the gap but you're still putting more power to the ground in a manual.
Click to expand...

Agreed and because the manual puts out more power they usualy give the manual a lower final drive ratio thus allowing a higher top speed and better fuel economy.
 

Stang8URMPRT

Active Member
Dec 28, 2003
1,100
1
38
Daytona Beach, FL
Nov 12, 2004
#47
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #47
Thank you for clarifiying that. I was starting to wonder WTF these people were talking about.
 

SAYNOTORICE

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
152
0
0
Massachusetts
Nov 12, 2004
#48
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #48
wtf!!!!!!! this thread is supposed to be about an 05 mustang ET....fu*K this transmission s*it...i am getting sick and tired of @ssholes postin ETs without time slips or videos...i have been trying to remain optomisitc about the performance of the new mustang and i still am but i want real results...for the next @sshole who posts an 05 ET without a time slip or video i am going to find you and knock your f**king teeth into your stomach
 
S

Stang2k5

New Member
Oct 22, 2004
187
0
0
Nov 12, 2004
#49
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #49
SAYNOTORICE said:
wtf!!!!!!! this thread is supposed to be about an 05 mustang ET....fu*K this transmission s*it...i am getting sick and tired of @ssholes postin ETs without time slips or videos...i have been trying to remain optomisitc about the performance of the new mustang and i still am but i want real results...for the next @sshole who posts an 05 ET without a time slip or video i am going to find you and knock your f**king teeth into your stomach
Click to expand...

Take a few deep breaths ... Everything is going to be ok
 
G

Glenns05

New Member
Oct 16, 2004
47
0
0
Nov 12, 2004
#50
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #50
SAYNOTORICE said:
wtf!!!!!!! this thread is supposed to be about an 05 mustang ET....fu*K this transmission s*it...i am getting sick and tired of @ssholes postin ETs without time slips or videos...i have been trying to remain optomisitc about the performance of the new mustang and i still am but i want real results...for the next @sshole who posts an 05 ET without a time slip or video i am going to find you and knock your f**king teeth into your stomach
Click to expand...


 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Nov 12, 2004
#51
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #51
SonicBlue05GT said:
Oh btw, the car is stock of course with only 230 miles on it and I ran it with the jack and spare tire still in the truck.

-2005 Sonic Blue GT
1/4: 13.217 @ 103.31 60ft:2.011
Click to expand...
What ever happened to the fact that as with anything else with major moveing parts in this world, it needs breaking in. I feel sorry for those people that like putting a hex on something from the start like that. Anyway, glad to see you haveing fun in it however though, just be a little easy on it for the first few oil changes if you want the engine to be broken in properly and last.
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Nov 12, 2004
#52
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #52
FallenPhoenix said:
theoretically, with both transmissions completely stock, the manual will win if both are driven to their maximum. Of course that's with a 4-speed auto, the new 5-speed narrows the gap but you're still putting more power to the ground in a manual.
Click to expand...
The only ways an auto can win to a comparative manual are if the ratios are right and the transmission provides a nice clean and hard shift consistently.

Manuals put more power to the ground becaue they have the ability to launch harder with "clutch slippage" to help with power defficiency on trying to push such a large vehicle from a dead stop. But the main reason is because it is a 1:1 ratio and they have a direct connection to the engine. Automatics rely on fluid transfer and have less than a 1:1 ratio until the torque converter clutch locks up to give it a 1:1 ratio for mostly fuel economy (but this only happens at highway speeds or if the conditions are right at 45 mph and above). The bigger the load on an automatic (in this case a launch from a standstill), then the more the "lag" factor for the engine flywheel/flexplate to transmission input shaft ratio is - the reason manuals launch better yet put more stress on everything else on the driveline at the same time.
 
T

TomServo92

New Member
Dec 22, 2003
517
0
0
Texas
Nov 12, 2004
#53
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #53
SAYNOTORICE said:
wtf!!!!!!! this thread is supposed to be about an 05 mustang ET....fu*K this transmission s*it...i am getting sick and tired of @ssholes postin ETs without time slips or videos...i have been trying to remain optomisitc about the performance of the new mustang and i still am but i want real results...for the next @sshole who posts an 05 ET without a time slip or video i am going to find you and knock your f**king teeth into your stomach
Click to expand...

It sounds like someone could use a nap!

Just relax. You're getting worked up over nothing. Trust me on this one.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Nov 12, 2004
#54
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #54
SAYNOTORICE said:
wtf!!!!!!! this thread is supposed to be about an 05 mustang ET....fu*K this transmission s*it...i am getting sick and tired of @ssholes postin ETs without time slips or videos...i have been trying to remain optomisitc about the performance of the new mustang and i still am but i want real results...for the next @sshole who posts an 05 ET without a time slip or video i am going to find you and knock your f**king teeth into your stomach
Click to expand...
 

SAYNOTORICE

New Member
Aug 21, 2003
152
0
0
Massachusetts
Nov 12, 2004
#55
  • Nov 12, 2004
  • #55
sorry i drank a few beers since then so i feel better, but i know everyone can ubderstand my frustration
 

kirkyg

Founding Member
Jun 14, 2002
3,568
1
56
Beaumont, TX
Nov 13, 2004
#56
  • Nov 13, 2004
  • #56
I wouldn't doubt the 05 is capable of a 13.2 in cool weather...but this post is bs. No pics or clippies for 3 pages of posts =

kirkyg
 
C

Crazeecooter

New Member
Oct 26, 2004
2
0
0
Nov 13, 2004
#57
  • Nov 13, 2004
  • #57
ponycar17 said:
I've heard of a guy with a 5-speed '05 at Atlanta Dragway running 14.7@96 MPH shifting the heck out of the car. From 14.7 to 13.2 with an auto just doesn't sound right. I'll host the time slip if you email it to me. It may be saturday before I can host it though.

Email me through stangnet, then I'll email you my real address back... I don't want to leave my address posted on here for long.

I want to see this...
Click to expand...
My 95 GT ran quicker than that stock! GeeZ! Do you actually think those are the quickest times out there? Sounds to me like the guy might be clutching and gassin with the same foot. This new 05 GT with 4.10's and drag radials is easily a high 12 sec. car.
 

ttown

Founding Member
May 30, 2002
815
0
0
Oklahoma
Nov 13, 2004
#58
  • Nov 13, 2004
  • #58
Listen guys theirs lots of Mach's, 05's, and fbodies that will be in the 14's but don't blame the car on it. Most blame the car and mod it to assist their poor driving. My advice is until you can get the car in the times it is capable of don't do any mods and you'll be way ahead of the game.
 

ponycar17

Founding Member
Nov 17, 2001
1,367
4
38
Upstate South Carolina
Nov 14, 2004
#59
  • Nov 14, 2004
  • #59
Crazeecooter said:
My 95 GT ran quicker than that stock! GeeZ! Do you actually think those are the quickest times out there? Sounds to me like the guy might be clutching and gassin with the same foot. This new 05 GT with 4.10's and drag radials is easily a high 12 sec. car.
Click to expand...

Look, I only know what my bud has told me... He was at the track when this guy ran, and only pulled 14s at a very low MPH (96-98...)... You can't tell me that MPH has very much to do with the driver, because it doesn't... You can have a crappy run that makes as much MPH as your fast run... I know; I do it a lot... It's a heavy car; I can believe 14s...

Besides, the thread starter here still has NOT emailed me with any info about his time slip, and I'm perfectly willing to host it...
 

351CJ

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
1,732
1
0
Nov 14, 2004
#60
  • Nov 14, 2004
  • #60
ponycar17 said:
Look, I only know what my bud has told me... He was at the track when this guy ran, and only pulled 14s at a very low MPH (96-98...)... You can't tell me that MPH has very much to do with the driver, because it doesn't... You can have a crappy run that makes as much MPH as your fast run... I know; I do it a lot... It's a heavy car; I can believe 14s...

Besides, the thread starter here still has NOT emailed me with any info about his time slip, and I'm perfectly willing to host it...
Click to expand...

Check some of the other threads. We've got pretty good proof that the '05 Mustang GT is capable of at least 13.6 with 68 degrees and very humid conditions.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Progress Thread Black Beauty: '85 GT T-Top: Winter Is Coming
  • LiquidStangs
  • Jul 30, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 3, 2019
LiquidStangs
1200 Hours; No, It's Not A Kit; And Yes I'm The Owner. And A Can Of Bars Leak.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jul 22, 2012
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 26, 2012
StreetsideStig
S
Howdy from Maine
  • shaboopy
  • Aug 21, 2011
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
832
The Welcome Wagon Aug 22, 2011
LAVAgt2012
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?