• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

yes or no for gears?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DMAN302
  • Start date Start date Mar 4, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Mar 4, 2004
#1
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #1
My 88 gt runs like a bear with the 2.73 gear in it, I kind of enjoy the long second gear as the power comes on when the tach crosses the 2800-3000 mark, but I can't say it doesn't feel a bit flat under the 2500 mark, How much difference is there really with a swap to 3.73 in the performance of the car, do second and third become to short? Does it really FEEL that different cause $340 for gear and rebuild kit (Canadian) and another $300 to install is a big bite so I really would like some input as to how big a deal the "FELT" effect is.
 
S

sleeper89

New Member
Nov 18, 2002
388
0
0
Toronto, Ontario
Mar 4, 2004
#2
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #2
the diff is night and day. you'll be rowing the gears like silken lauman

-steve
 
4

4eyed5.0

Member
Mar 4, 2004
33
0
6
VA
Mar 4, 2004
#3
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #3
It is a massive difference putting gears in. I went from 3.08's to 3.73's and it felt like the car picked up a hundred horsepower from it. And you will still be able to cruise 60 mph at 2000-2200 rpm.
 

66 Tiger

New Member
Jul 13, 2003
249
0
0
Virginia
Mar 4, 2004
#4
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #4
Couldn't believe the difference. It's hard to even get traction in 1st now! 3.73's rule!
 

slowjoe

Banned
Feb 5, 2002
1,841
0
0
Good o'l New Mexico, Next to the cereal isle.
Mar 4, 2004
#5
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #5
4.10 or if your gear enuff 4.30's!!
 

DMAN302

My mom says thanks for the pearl necklace.
Nov 8, 2003
2,120
2
59
windsor, Canada
Mar 4, 2004
#6
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #6
Come on....100horse pick up is a real reach but you are definately starting to make a case for it. So maybe I'll go ahead with it, but don't feel you need to stop convincing me cause I really appreciate as much input as I can before I jump on a new mod.
 

Jkstang78

Founding Member
Oct 14, 2002
1,510
1
38
long island N.Y.
Mar 4, 2004
#7
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #7
BIG difference Go for it you wont be dissaponited
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Mar 4, 2004
#8
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #8
yes i had 4.10's in my 87 lx and they were outta this world. this time being blown i dont want to rev up so fast so i will go 3.55 this time i guess.but they are in the top 5 i would say for cheap mods.
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Mar 4, 2004
#9
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #9
my car feld so much lighter with the gears...I was able to chirp 2 gear with my AOD while I still had it... it's only mod besides exhaust...BIG difference...Make sure to get FORD RACING gear set...and nothing else!
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Mar 4, 2004
#10
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #10
not true i disagree richmond also make's very nice gears set's.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Mar 4, 2004
#11
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #11
Nope,,Get Ford Racing gears,they are the quietest!! I got 373's in my aod.Im getting 410's by the summer.373's in a 5spd is suppose to be killer
 

88GTStreetRod

Member
Jan 5, 2004
376
1
18
USA
Mar 4, 2004
#12
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #12
I went from 3.55 to 4.10. The best money I have ever spent!!!!!!!!



DMAN302 said:
My 88 gt runs like a bear with the 2.73 gear in it, I kind of enjoy the long second gear as the power comes on when the tach crosses the 2800-3000 mark, but I can't say it doesn't feel a bit flat under the 2500 mark, How much difference is there really with a swap to 3.73 in the performance of the car, do second and third become to short? Does it really FEEL that different cause $340 for gear and rebuild kit (Canadian) and another $300 to install is a big bite so I really would like some input as to how big a deal the "FELT" effect is.
Click to expand...
 

_jb_

New Member
Mar 4, 2004
808
0
0
Michigan, Berrien County
Mar 4, 2004
#13
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #13
Cool, one of my questions was just answered! But overall, for street racing (every once in a while) and daily driving, should I go with the 3.55s? I also have an 88 GT with 2.73 and I am worried I will burn up my clutch with the current gears.
 

GMstomper

New Member
Jan 30, 2004
71
0
0
Blackwood, NJ
Mar 4, 2004
#14
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #14
Went from 2.73's to 3.27's and loved it. May go higher now that I'm starting all over again (she was in hibernation for 2 years!) and shes not my dily driver. But I'm not sure about it with the AOD...dont want to burn thru second and third too quick. Also concerned about my cruising RPM's...especially since I have a problem driving under 75 on the highway. I keep driving faster the older I get. LOL
 

NorCal66

New Member
Aug 12, 2003
334
0
0
Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA HOME
Mar 4, 2004
#15
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #15
i have a quick kind of add on question: how would 3.73s affect CITY gas milage compared to the 2.73s, I'm kind of in the same situation
 

roush 97

New Member
Aug 28, 2003
86
0
0
Illinois
Mar 4, 2004
#16
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #16
I would say the 3.73's would be the better for city driving. You don't have to put your foot into it as much to get going. Out on the highway though is where your milage would go down with the 3.73's running at a higher rpm.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Mar 4, 2004
#17
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #17
_JB_ said:
Cool, one of my questions was just answered! But overall, for street racing (every once in a while) and daily driving, should I go with the 3.55s? I also have an 88 GT with 2.73 and I am worried I will burn up my clutch with the current gears.
Click to expand...
I went from 2.73's to 3.55's in my full weight 5-speed LX, and honestly, if I could do it all over again, I'd go with the 3.73's. Don't get me wrong, the 3.55's are still a night and day improvement over the 2.73's, but it could still use juuuuuuust a little more. The only disadvantage to them, is that when you're tired at the end of the day and are feeling lazy in stop and go traffic, you'll find yourself alllllways rowing through the gears. First gear get's pretty short when you get beyond the 3.55-mark.

.....and don't worry at all about burning out your clutch or transmission with the stock 2.73's. As long as you're not running around towing a boat, the stock 10.5 Valeo will hold up fine.
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Mar 4, 2004
#18
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #18
NorCal66 said:
i have a quick kind of add on question: how would 3.73s affect CITY gas milage compared to the 2.73s, I'm kind of in the same situation
Click to expand...

If you're talking about the car in your sig, it will be a LOT different for you. I notice you have a C-4 which is obviously not an overdrive transmission. I have 3.50's in my '65 and that's all the higher I would go if you run around on the freeway at all. Gas mileage really isn't affected that much with the overdrive tranny, but with the C-4 you will notice a definite drop in MPG, and your cruising RPM will go up quite a bit on the highway.
 

_jb_

New Member
Mar 4, 2004
808
0
0
Michigan, Berrien County
Mar 4, 2004
#19
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #19
Gearbanger 101 said:
I went from 2.73's to 3.55's in my full weight 5-speed LX, and honestly, if I could do it all over again, I'd go with the 3.73's. Don't get me wrong, the 3.55's are still a night and day improvement over the 2.73's, but it could still use juuuuuuust a little more. The only disadvantage to them, is that when you're tired at the end of the day and are feeling lazy in stop and go traffic, you'll find yourself alllllways rowing through the gears. First gear get's pretty short when you get beyond the 3.55-mark.

.....and don't worry at all about burning out your clutch or transmission with the stock 2.73's. As long as you're not running around towing a boat, the stock 10.5 Valeo will hold up fine.
Click to expand...

With the T-5 on the highway, going between 70-80mph, would the engine be really cranking if I go with the 3.73s?
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Mar 4, 2004
#20
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #20
_JB_ said:
With the T-5 on the highway, going between 70-80mph, would the engine be really cranking if I go with the 3.73s?
Click to expand...

No, actually it puts the engine right into the beginning of it's powerband around 2,300 and 2,500 rpm. These cars should have come standard with at least 3.27's or 3.55's as far as I'm concerned. Don't fear the gear!
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
290
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
483
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?