Handling wise Fox 5.0 or sn95 5.0

revedup

Member
Nov 18, 2005
63
0
6
S.F. Cal,
Handling wise stock versus stock i hear the sn95 outhandles the fox 5.0,s
Does this seem to be the case?
Members with experience let me know,
Im wondering if it,s enough to sell my fox 5.0 and get an sn95 5.0 :SNSign:
 
Yes, it's true IMHO (I have one of each). But........... you can certainly get your fox III up to par with some aftermarket parts. On the other hand, if you get an SN (assuming you'd keep it pushrodded), you have to deal with the finicky computer. Six of one, a half dozen...............

Good luck.
 
:nonono: Those year 5.o,s have the leaner settings for performance right???????:eek:
Yes, it's true IMHO (I have one of each). But........... you can certainly get your fox III up to par with some aftermarket parts. On the other hand, if you get an SN (assuming you'd keep it pushrodded), you have to deal with the finicky computer. Six of one, a half dozen...............

Good luck.
 
Actually, I would indeed say that the 94-95 *GT* (not Cobra) tune does have too much timing and too little fuel. This is an issue with the stock programming (in an effort to clean up emissions), not with the stock computer (the processor is superior to the Fox III's).

What would make me decide is simply the huge difference in aesthetics between the two and peoples' personal preferences in that regard. Some love the look of the III's and some love the IV's.
 
The newer the Mustang, the better it handles.

The 94-98's handle better than the Fox and the 99-04's handle better than the 94-98's (due to wider track and new spring/shock combo)


I remember when i first bought my '03 Gt after driving nothing but Fox's around my first impression was "Wow, does this thing handle nice!"

Of course, Foxes are lighter and toss some aftermarket parts at them and they can move as well. As nice as my Gt handles compared to the average Fox, my own LX with aftermarker suspension can still take a turn a hell of a lot faster than my GT can.