Sn-95 vs. Fox axles. Pic comparsion.

MustangOwner

Banned
Dec 13, 2006
160
0
0
Well before i tore my car all apart i was running a 18x9 with a 24mm offset and sn-95 axles. I was getting a little rubbing on the rear fender lip. Not much but enough to piss me off. My orignal plan was to buy some Moser 5 lug stock length axles and some North cobra caliper mounting brace and be done. That would suck my wheels in 3/4 of an inch and fix the problem. Well i was scared that they would give my rear end the "sucked in" look. So before i forked out over $400.00 bucks for the axles and braces i thought i'd steel my neighbors stock length axles and see what it looks like. Well i was right, it sucks my rear rims in WAY to far. It looks completely ghey. You might not be able to tell to much from the pictures but trust me in person it looks really bad. And it was raining so i couldn't get the best of all pictures. So instead of doing the axle swap i think i'm just gonna roll the rear fender lips and call it good. That should fix my problem and not cost $400 bucks. And yes i could put in the shorter fox axles and then space them out so they sit perfect but i dont want to run a spacer. And right now with the sn-95 axles the rear sits out further then the front and i like that. And i'm also getting front and rear Maximum Motorsports coil over setup so i can also adjust the ride height if it still rubs. Either way it will be fixed. So i thought before i drop the rear end i'd take some pictures of what i'm talking about. I've never seen any side by side comparsion pics before so here yah go.

The passenger side has the sn-95 axles and the drivers side has the fox axles.

View attachment 369436
View attachment 369438
View attachment 369440
View attachment 369442
View attachment 369444
View attachment 369446

Fox on the right, sn-95 on the left. The fox axles have longer studs but the height is the same so you can see the difference between the two axles as far as length goes.
View attachment 369448

Edit: The best pics are #1 and #2
 
Damn, everyone has those Kumho 712's these days

Ha well that was the best performance tire for the buck i could get at the time. I think they are a great tire but now i'm going to Good Year Eagles F1 gs-d3. The kumhos are like brand new with maybe 800 miles on them ha, can we say burn out? But the eagles are $244.00 whole sale cost. And i think i paid like 112? wholesale for the kumhos ha. So thats why i bought them. But it was a waste afterall ha. Gotta love family owned dealerships ha.
 
I have a set of Kumho's on my 5.0. Can't wait to burn them off. I put some Bridgestone Potenza S-03's on my GT and OMG it's an incredible tire!! It's like glue in the dry or wet. Just last week i was driving on the hgihway in the pouring rain and the car felt solid and stuck to the road. Never had that feeling with the Kumhos
 
View attachment 369358

View attachment 369360

IMG_2496.webp


View attachment 369364

img377.webp
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2496.webp
    IMG_2496.webp
    49.7 KB · Views: 116
  • img377.webp
    img377.webp
    27.2 KB · Views: 102
I'm confused on why you just posted a bunch of pictures of your notch :shrug:
And that article only shows the difference between the two axles sitting on the ground. I said i've never seen a comparison of fox vs sn-95 axles on a car. So i took pictures to show you, you can't get a better side by side comparison then i just gave you.
 
nice notch....


Thank you. I was just showing the fitment of various wheels with the sn-95 axleshafts.

91FoxSaleenGTLX

Thank you for your side by side comparison, I also did a 5-lug conversion on my 1990 Fox Saleen replica. However that conversion was front disc and rear drum, using the stock axleshafts. Here's a pic of my car with Saleen wheels...

img128-1.webp


Here are those same wheels on one of my SVOs...
img110.webp
 

Attachments

  • img128-1.webp
    img128-1.webp
    31.2 KB · Views: 133
  • img110.webp
    img110.webp
    47.1 KB · Views: 140