Brett Favre Considering Comeback!

[Venom351R]

Actually, Rice never retired and came back.

Im using him as an example of players who stuck around way longer then they should have and left the game a shell of what they used to be. Its hard for any player to walk away but its just as hard for fans to see how much worse they get over the years when the refuse to go.

 

[gt40_2003wes]

well my emotions are mixed on this one. ofcourse i wanna see favre play for the rest of my life but then again i dont want him to turn into another wash up.

i think he needs to make his mind up already and stick with it.

 

[CENTENNIALSTANG]

I hope he does, its not like he had a bad year. play at 100% till you cant i say

 

[5.0_GT_kid]

well my emotions are mixed on this one. ofcourse i wanna see favre play for the rest of my life but then again i dont want him to turn into another wash up.

i think he needs to make his mind up already and stick with it.

If Favre comes back, its highly unlikely it'll be in a Packers uniform.

 

[mrvax]

Crazy, crazy story. How many times now? What if Aaron Rodgers has him whacked?

IMO, Favre was only 50% as good as media makes him out to be. He is a compiler. He is to football what Nolan Ryan was to baseball.

I like the guy as a person and can almost understand why he doesn't want to leave the sport he loves.

 

[Bluffing024]

If Favre comes back, its highly unlikely it'll be in a Packers uniform.

He is still under contract. They would have to trade him.

 

[jasonh_86]

He is still under contract. They would have to trade him.

Actually, if he or his agent writes them a letter requesting reinstatement then they have to either put him on the roster or release him. So, if they didn't want him and he wrote that letter, then he'd be released and could go anywhere he wanted (that needs a QB).. And if they're smart they'll keep him so he can't come back to hurt them in the playoffs or some other time.

 

[Venom351R]

Favre is asking the Packers for a release

Reporeted on NFL Live 4:00 EST

 

[5.0_GT_kid]

 

[mixedbreed02gt]

Favre seeks return, requests release from Packers

Favre seeks return, requests release from Packers

NFL.com

Brett Favre told the NFL Network's Steve Mariucci on Friday that he's very serious about playing again. The lingering question now appears to be whether that will happen with the Green Bay Packers.

Favre has requested his release from the Packers in a letter to the team sent through his agent, James "Bus" Cook. The request comes after a conference call Tuesday in which Favre expressed to team officials his desire to play again.

Jonathan Daniel / Getty Images
Brett Favre announced his retirement from the NFL on March 6.

Favre told Mariucci, who was Favre's position coach with the Packers from 1992-95, that he felt the Packers were ready to go forward without him, but that he still wants to play. If that is the team's stance, Favre indicated, then the only alternatives would be a trade or a release.

"[Favre] just felt, 'If you aren't going to have me back, then at least release me, to allow me to look for work,' " Mariucci said. " 'No hard feelings; we'll just go on with our business.'

"Right now he's feeling pretty darn good," Mariucci said, "and he's very serious about playing."

The Packers have remained publicly silent about their interest in welcoming back Favre, who announced his retirement March 6. The Packers released a written statement Friday acknowledging they "are aware of the latest developments" regarding Favre.

"Brett earned and exercised the right to retire on his terms," the statement read. "We wanted him to return and welcomed him back on more than one occasion. Brett’s press conference and subsequent conversations in the following weeks illustrated his commitment to retirement. The finality of his decision to retire was accepted by the organization. At that point, the Green Bay Packers made the commitment to move forward with our football team."

Favre, 38, played all but the first of his 17 NFL seasons with the Packers, but Mariucci said Favre would consider playing for another team, if the Packers indeed have moved on.

"If they will not have him in Green Bay and he wants to play and he's ready and able to play, yes, he would consider playing for someone else," Mariucci said. "As hard as I think that is to imagine, I think the answer is yes, he would consider playing for someone else if it's not going to happen in Green Bay."

The Packers placed Favre on the reserve/retired list on April 25, meaning that the future Hall of Famer no longer counted against the team's 80-player roster. To be reinstated off that list, Favre would have to send written notification to the Packers and the NFL of his intentions to play.

Once the league is notified, the Packers would have approximately 24 hours to make a decision to either activate or release Favre.

The statement did not indicate what the Packers would do at that point.

"As always," the team's statement said, "the Packers will do what’s right and in the best interest of the team. As with all Packers greats, Brett's legacy will always be celebrated by our fans and the organization, regardless of any change in his personal intentions."

 

[Venom351R]

Wouldn't be Ironic if he went to Minnesota or Chicago and then they stomp the packers this year. Both teams need a QB. Grossman is the poster child for the word FAIL

 

[mixedbreed02gt]

Wouldn't be Ironic if he went to Minnesota or Chicago and then they stomp the packers this year. Both teams need a QB. Grossman is the poster child for the word FAIL

You know it would be interesting if Atlanta signed him to groom Matt Ryan. Atlanta could be a playoff contender with a decent QB.

 

[mixedbreed02gt]

Packers won't release Favre, or promise defined role

Packers refusing to release Favre!!! Looks like they either hell bent on keeping him retired, or seeing if someone will make a trade offer for him. Smart decision by the Packers to move ahead with the future. I don't think it's fair to them to have to wait on Favre to make up his mind on whether or not he wants to play. Hopefully he'll just pack it in and retire and save his reputation and his career before it's too late and he does something stupid.

Packers won't release Favre, or promise defined role

Associated Press

GREEN BAY, Wis. -- The last thing Green Bay Packers general manager Ted Thompson and coach Mike McCarthy want to do is engage in a public shouting match with Brett Favre, even after the three-time MVP put the team in a tough spot by changing his mind on retirement and demanding a release from his contract just weeks before training camp.

But by detailing Favre's dizzying decision-making process this offseason, Thompson and McCarthy hope Packers fans will understand why the team isn't necessarily tossing aside all its plans just because Favre recently decided he wants to play again.

Making their first public comments since Favre demanded his release this week, Thompson and McCarthy told The Associated Press on Saturday that the team had no plans to release Favre. They said Favre is welcome to rejoin the team, but he would be doing so without a defined role.

"We've communicated that to Brett, that we have since moved forward," Thompson said Saturday. "At the same time, we've never said that there couldn't be some role that he might play here. But I would understand his point that he would want to play."

And if Favre wanted to play for the Packers, he had the chance earlier this offseason. He told offensive line coach James Campen -- a close friend of Favre who McCarthy said has been inaccurately described as an official intermediary between the quarterback and the team -- a few weeks after his tearful goodbye news conference that he was having second thoughts and might play again.

With Thompson and McCarthy preparing to board a private plane to fly to Mississippi and seal the deal on a comeback, all Favre had to do was say yes.

He didn't.

"Ted always wanted Brett back," McCarthy said. "We always wanted Brett back."

A message left by the AP with Favre's agent, James "Bus" Cook, was not immediately returned.

Favre, who led the Packers to a Super Bowl title after the 1996 season, announced his retirement March 6. He had made high drama out of his waffling over retirement in the past several offseasons, but it seemed to be for real this time.

Until Favre told Campen a few weeks later that he was having second thoughts. After several telephone discussions with Favre led them to believe he wanted to return, Thompson and McCarthy were preparing to go to Mississippi when Favre suddenly called McCarthy.

"He said he appreciated all the planning we were going to do," McCarthy said. "But he felt that at this point, he had reached a point of closure, to use his words, and he was going to stick with his initial decision."

Even after Favre's near-comeback in March, McCarthy and Thompson said they regularly communicated with Favre. Thompson even went to Mississippi to visit Favre in May, and didn't get the sense Favre was having serious thoughts about playing again as the two had lunch on his back porch.

"He mentioned several things where you could tell there's always indecisiveness," Thompson said. "He's wondering if he made the right decision. I think that's normal."

But the tone changed dramatically in June, when Campen said he was getting worried about Favre. McCarthy said he had a phone conversation with Favre on June 20, and the quarterback sent a clear message: "Give me my helmet or give me my release."

Even then, McCarthy said when he asked Favre if he was ready to make a 100 percent commitment to football -- an issue Favre had brought up in his retirement news conference -- the answer still was no.

"That always seemed to be the one thing that he had to come to grips with," McCarthy said.

Next came a text message exchange between Thompson and Favre on July 4. At the time, Thompson didn't think it was a big deal that he wrote Favre back saying he was traveling and asked if they could talk Monday.

But then Thompson began getting texts from Cook. Sensing rising tension, Thompson and McCarthy agreed to a conference call with Favre and Cook on Tuesday.

Matt Ludtke / Associated Press
The Packers had committed to Aaron Rodgers as their starting quarterback in 2008.

Only then, McCarthy said, did Favre say he was 100 percent committed to playing. McCarthy said he doesn't question Favre's commitment to football, but said Favre often brought up the issue himself.

"The way he plays the game illustrates the guy is committed," McCarthy said. "(But) those are his words. That was always his final hurdle that he said he had to get over."

The hurdle was apparently cleared weeks before the start of training camp.

"Was it convincing? I'd say yes," McCarthy said. "But that was the first time, July 8, that I'd ever heard him say (he was committed). And he continually, from (June) 21 to July 8, told James Campen that he was not going to play. So that's a pretty important piece of the puzzle."

Cook then sent the Packers a letter officially asking for Favre to be released, which would allow him to sign with any NFL team.

At this point, Favre is not being offered a defined role with the Packers if he returns, and the team not inclined to release him so he could sign with a division rival. A trade may be the best resolution.

Thompson and McCarthy declined to discuss that possibility, and Thompson said he had not received any inquiries from other teams as of Saturday morning.

Where does that leave the Packers and their beloved three-time MVP?

In a pretty big mess.

"Quite frankly, it's a little gut-wrenching as an organization to go through it, and certainly for Mike and myself," Thompson said. "This stuff hurts a lot of people. I mean, it hurts. I'm not talking about physically hurting, but the sensitivity. We understand where the fans are coming from. This is a hot-button issue that surpasses anything I've ever gone through."

 

[CENTENNIALSTANG]

aww ****

 

[1990Coupe]

Bret can still be productive and despite his age still plays better then a lot of the younger QB's in the league.


I just think when you say its over it should be over. These players that leave and come back do nothing but tarnish what they have accomplished in the past. Jordon retired and came back along w/ Jerry Rice and they both were nothing close to what they were before. Instead of going out at the top of your game when you know its time, they hang on and walk away the game a shell of their former self.

John Elway did it right. Im not a Bronco's fan although I dont have anything against the team, its just that Elway knew it was time, he could have played another year yet did not. He stepped away as all players should, and not hanging on for way to long

Agreed.. However with the Jordan retirement - he retired the first time, and came back out of retirement and won 3 more championships... his Second comback to the wizards.. he blew

 

[jasonh_86]

Wouldn't be Ironic if he went to Minnesota or Chicago and then they stomp the packers this year. Both teams need a QB. Grossman is the poster child for the word FAIL

View attachment 310860

 

[jasonh_86]

I don't understand why people say he's going to tarnish his legacy or his reputation by playing for another team.. Here are a few examples that hasn't tarnished some of the best..

John Elway - Drafted by the Colts, but refused to play for them. Said he was going to play baseball, but the owner gave in and traded him.

Joe Montana - Traded to the Chiefs after Steve Young emerged while Montana was injured.

Johnny Unitas - Drafted by the Steelers and didn't even make the roster. Picked up by the Colts and later on was traded to the Chargers.

Joe Namath - Played for the Jets, but was later waived by the franchise and signed by the Rams.

Emmitt Smith - Played for the Cowboys for a long time, then played for the Arizona Cardinals.

None of them have tarnished their legacies or reputations by their early and late career moves/decisions. So I don't see any reason why Favre's would be tarnished.

 

[5.0_GT_kid]

I don't understand why people say he's going to tarnish his legacy or his reputation by playing for another team.. Here are a few examples that hasn't tarnished some of the best..

John Elway - Drafted by the Colts, but refused to play for them. Said he was going to play baseball, but the owner gave in and traded him.

Joe Montana - Traded to the Chiefs after Steve Young emerged while Montana was injured.

Johnny Unitas - Drafted by the Steelers and didn't even make the roster. Picked up by the Colts and later on was traded to the Chargers.

Joe Namath - Played for the Jets, but was later waived by the franchise and signed by the Rams.

Emmitt Smith - Played for the Cowboys for a long time, then played for the Arizona Cardinals.

None of them have tarnished their legacies or reputations by their early and late career moves/decisions. So I don't see any reason why Favre's would be tarnished.

Favre has already tarnished his image by acting like a douchebag cry baby.

 

[jasonh_86]

Favre has already tarnished his image by acting like a douchebag cry baby.

So I guess John Elway's was tarnished from the beginning since he was being a cry baby about playing with the team that drafted him.. just like Eli Manning.

 

[mixedbreed02gt]

So I guess John Elway's was tarnished from the beginning since he was being a cry baby about playing with the team that drafted him.. just like Eli Manning.

it's different though, because neither of which ever suited up and played for the team that drafted them.

lets' not confuse the 2 though, Eli Womanning is no John Elway nor will he ever be a John Elway, IMO, he's not qualified to carry John Elways jock strap.

Id be willing to bet if Elway went and suited up right now, he'd outplay WoManning blindfolded.