I have watched this video probably about 1,000 times from every angle available..
the ball was never in his non throwing hand, when his throwing arm came down he got hit right as his hand crossed his non throwing hand that caused a little contact with the non throwing hand..
In my opinion it was close but should have been ruled a fumble but also woodson should have been called for the helmet to helmet and the hand in the facemask of the helmet on that play..
See raiders fans take one side of the the play and ignore the illegal contact saying "well it was not called"
Ok then we can call it even they blew the fumble ruling and blew the roughing the passer ruling so the right team ended up with the ball anyways
watch the non raiders propaganda angle of that play and you can see clearly that as the arm was coming down woodson's helmet slamed into bradys and his hand caught more facemask then football.
Looks like a wash to me.
Plus as far as I am concerned the raiders had plenty of time to stop the pats after that and they could have won it in OT
same for the seahawks even if the TD was not a TD they still could have won that game.. Every game has missed calls, ball calls.. the patriots like every other team has gotten the benefit and have been screwed by them in the past and the will in the future too.
BTW why do raiders fans think they would have won the SB that year had they won the snowbowl game..
They are making a lot of assumptions that they would have been able to pull off the same back to back upsets NE did.. The superbowl that year was a epic upset almost as much of one as last years SB.
The raiders were a lower seed with a 10-6 record that season, the patriots were the 2 seed with a 11-5 record and had a bye. Oakland fans need to stop with the revisionist history that the 2001 raiders were some uber team that was screwed out of a SB..
yeah your right if the steelers or ravens win the SB this year they would have a chance at winning it next year too that would tie them with the patriots for the decade..
then it would be open for debate but i still go with the pats over either because
1. more SB's appeared in
2. more seasons deep into the playoffs (05 pats lost in afc divisional and 06 lost in afc championship game
If the ravens do it then the first and the last two would have such a wide separation that it's hard to consider it the same core group of players..
In my opinion if the steelers win this and the next then they would have a much more legitimate claim to being the team of the decade.
Wow just think of how much more crap the major sports media would have made up about spygate had they not been in love with the patriots and brady
LOL those clowns were trying to invent new ways to use tape in game to bury them more... then inventing stories like the walk through tape and according to you they have a love fest with NE..
I am not sure about brady but quite a large chunk of the media has HATED belichick for a long time.