• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

1.6 or 1.7 Roller Rockers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 5ohMustang
  • Start date Start date Jan 16, 2004

5ohMustang

Founding Member
Jul 18, 2001
623
0
0
NJ/Alaska/Currently Afghanistan
Jan 16, 2004
#1
  • Jan 16, 2004
  • #1
I have a DSS 306 Pro bullet, Edelbrock RPM II intake, and TFS track heat heads. Planning on getting a custom cam from Anderson Ford. Should I use 1.6 or 1.7 RR?
Thanks,
Brian
 

5ohMustang

Founding Member
Jul 18, 2001
623
0
0
NJ/Alaska/Currently Afghanistan
Jan 18, 2004
#2
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #2
Anybody?
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Jan 18, 2004
#3
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #3
Well, obviously you'll get more lift with the 1.7 rockers. Might run into some piston to valve clearance problems if the cam is too wild though.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Jan 18, 2004
#4
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #4
If your getting a custom cam, it won't matter really because they will just machine the cam differently. Although OTS cams are usually grown to 1.6 specs and with some cams the lift would be too high with 1.7's. However, with some cams, the 1.7's give the extra lift the cam needs, like the B cam that I have.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jan 18, 2004
#5
  • Jan 18, 2004
  • #5
90Mustang is getting at the issue - talk to your cam grinder about the appropriate ratio before you buy. The custom specs should specify a certain lift - they should be able to spec a lobe that will work with either ratio. If you're using stock base circle cam and stock length pushrods, the valve train geometry may be a bit better with 1.6's since that's the stock ratio. Piston to valve clearance is impacted very, very little by the difference between the ratios (something around 3 to 4 thousandths). With changes like yours absolutely should be measured, but inless you're right on the edge of minimum clearances, the ratio change won't hurt you.
 
9

93cobra12

New Member
Nov 21, 2003
531
0
0
Seatte, WA
Jan 19, 2004
#6
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #6
I have a crower cam part # 15512, its lift with the 1.6 are .496/.512

but since 93 cobras come w/ 1.7's my lift is .527/.544 ... This is used in a 331.. I had this cam in my stock 5.0 and i had my pistons notched, plus it was way too big for my stroke which caused a huge drag in the lower rpm's...But The way you figure your lift for the 1.7 is by using this equation..

Intake lift / 1.6= X , X * 1.7= Intake Lift , same for the exhaust side..

so if you want to figure out what your lift is for 1.7 r.r thats how you do it.. Then from there you can figure if the cam is too big for your engine, having clearence issues, which means you would have to notch your pistons. But like everyone said, if your having a custom grind cam, then you dont have to worry about anything...good luck
 
R

redterror302

Founding Member
Jun 29, 2002
895
0
0
Mertztown, PA or State College, PA
Jan 19, 2004
#7
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #7
Since you are going with a custom grind, I would say just go with the 1.6's. There will be no need to alter the lift of the cam, since it will be ground to certain specifications designed to your setup. I don't know if it is true, but I heard that the higher ratio you go, the more stress you have on the valvetrain? I don't know about that though. I would just go with the 1.6's in your case.

Chris

p.s. 93cobra12: How much for the stock cobra intake?
 
9

93cobra12

New Member
Nov 21, 2003
531
0
0
Seatte, WA
Jan 19, 2004
#8
  • Jan 19, 2004
  • #8
half of whatever ford racing is selling it for new...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

For Sale Ford 331 stroker engine for sale - with options!
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
240
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
416
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
621
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 19, 2026
spencergt66
S
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
871
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
H
turbo advice
  • hawkinsdrag
  • May 5, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
484
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2025
hoopty5.0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?