• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

1.6 or 1.72 rockers whats the difference

  • Thread starter Thread starter joebeez
  • Start date Start date Jul 15, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
J

joebeez

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
15
0
0
utah
Jul 15, 2004
#1
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #1
I'm current looking into some roller rockers for my 83' 5.0 and i'm not sure which ones i should get. Either the 1.6 or the 1.72 rockers and if i should get the 3/8 or 7/16 studs. please help!!!
 

monsterstang70

New Member
Jun 24, 2004
145
0
0
Amityville, NY
Jul 15, 2004
#2
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #2
I'm not totally sure about the studs but if you want to keep the stock springs, go with the 1.6's because they dont produce as much lift as 1.72's. But if your gunna upgrade your springs and want some more lift with your cam, go with the 1.72. You can also go with 1.7's. If you need a set of them, I got a brand new, never used set of FRPP 1.7 roller rockers.
 

82boy

New Member
Jun 22, 2004
41
0
0
Jul 15, 2004
#3
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #3
i would run 7/16 studs they are much stronger. hope your not using factory heads they are psdistool mount.
 

FLA5.0

New Member
Jun 24, 2004
45
0
0
Saint Cloud, Fl
Jul 15, 2004
#4
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #4
Before you put on a set of aftermarket rockers, (especially 1.7:1's), you better check p/v clearance, make sure your springs aren't going to bind, as well as plan on modifying or replacing your valve covers. The stud size mentioned refers to the size of the stud you will be mounting the rockers on. ie...most unmodified 302 heads have 3/8" studs whereas 351 heads used 7/16", (or do I have that backwards?), or you may have had 7/16" screw-in's put in your 302 head...anyway that will determine what rockers you will require for your app.


One thing you may want to consider: Crane Cams makes a kit, P/N 270-36806-16, that converts stock pedestal mount rockers to a roller bearing for about $180.00.
 

astronut1885

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,899
4
39
Assonet, MA
Jul 15, 2004
#5
  • Jul 15, 2004
  • #5
Roller rockers are a great mod, they relieve valvetrain stress, lessen oil heating by friction, and free up horsepower. Ford used 1.6 ratio stamped rockers on our motors, so using a 1.6 roller will maintain your factory valvetrain specs. 1.72 rockers create a little more lift and duration by magnifying the lift of the cam a little more than the 1.6s This is calculated by taking the length of the highest part of a cam lobe from the center of the cam, and multiplying it by the ratio of the rocker. Basically it's either "xyz" lift x 1.6 or "xyz" lift x 1.72, where the 1.72 ratio will result in more lift. The higher ratio can be good good because it essentially "beefs up" your cam a bit, and allows your heads to breathe better. It does have a down side though. Ford engineered it's heads to run with 1.6 ratio rockers, so everything is made to those specs. running 1.7s puts a little extra stress on the valve train, and can lead to alot of valve guide wear. That might be acceptable if you want to rebuild your heads every two years, but most guys opt for 1.6s because the tradeoff isn't worth it. I myself run 1.7s on a set of prepped GT40P heads, and I love 'em. They give my cam a little more balls, and they free horsepower. I don't plan on running my heads forever anyway, so the 1.7s work for me. They were also available at the cheapest price through a friend, which helped. I have no valve clearance issues, and my combustion chambers are smaller than stock heads, I have a bigger cam, and the bigger rockers. Think about the tradeoffs- more lift vs. longevity, and decide which ratio you want. I believe stock and Ford Racing heads are pedistal mount, but I'm not sure of the thread size. Once you've figured out the numbers you want/need, pick a quality brand and go to town!
 
J

joebeez

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
15
0
0
utah
Jul 16, 2004
#6
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #6
how much do you want for um? the 1.7's?
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Jul 16, 2004
#7
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #7
you should be able to shim the 1.7's and get away with stock valve covers.......
 
J

joebeez

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
15
0
0
utah
Jul 16, 2004
#8
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #8
these arent stock heads. they are ported and polished. withhigh performance springs. the cam is a .512 intake .510 exaust custom grind. the manifold is equivalent to a edelbrok air gap and is also ported and polished. i do have stock valve covers. i hope i don't need new ones. ive heard both though
 

astronut1885

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,899
4
39
Assonet, MA
Jul 16, 2004
#9
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #9
If you need new ones, which you usually do, I have a set of Ford Racing tall valve covers for sale for 50. They have a small crack that any machine shop can weld for cheap, and I can show you how to get them to work on an EFI car (they're for carb'd cars). Let me know.
 
J

joebeez

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
15
0
0
utah
Jul 16, 2004
#10
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #10
mine is a carbed motor.... only now its a 750 because of all the mods done to it...... i may want your valve covers...i'll get back to you on that
 

astronut1885

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,899
4
39
Assonet, MA
Jul 16, 2004
#11
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #11
there's a pic of them at the link in my sig. They're sprayed black, but the paint is dinged up, so you could either repaint them or sandblast and polish. I paid 125.00 for them last year used.
 
J

joebeez

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
15
0
0
utah
Jul 16, 2004
#12
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #12
are they the ones with the flames on them?
 

jeffnoel

Founding Member
Aug 31, 2002
1,638
5
37
Clovis, CA
Jul 16, 2004
#13
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #13
Pedestal mounts are 5/16.
 

astronut1885

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,899
4
39
Assonet, MA
Jul 16, 2004
#14
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #14
No, the flame ones are my new ones. The black ones with the Ford Racing logo on them are the ones for sale. For some reason I can't get the thing to work that lets me post pics, and I'm way under limit.
This is the only good pic I have that's online, it's from before they were installed. The cap and breather are on the new covers, but you probably already have some breathers on your car now. Like I said, the paint is dinged up but it's just crappy Rustoleum anyway, nothing that couldn't be patched or stripped and polished. Biggest thing is the crack, but a machine shop can make quick work of it. It's a hairline crack near one of the bolt holes. It didn't leak, but for safety's sake I bought the new covers (plus they look cool).
http://www.cardomain.com/member_pag...images/2/web/470000-470999/470034_11_full.jpg
 

astronut1885

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,899
4
39
Assonet, MA
Jul 16, 2004
#15
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #15
Here's my ad in the classifieds, it's got a great pic of them, again pre install.
http://classifieds.stangnet.com/showproduct.php?product=2859&sort=1&cat=500&page=1
 
8

87fast

New Member
Dec 20, 2003
39
0
0
Jul 16, 2004
#16
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #16
im using 1.6 ford rollers with a 512 533 lift cam and there on pedastels and i dont have any problems . it has seen 6000 rpm ,if they do slip and break stuff then i will just have a excuse to go bigger and better
 
8

87fast

New Member
Dec 20, 2003
39
0
0
Jul 16, 2004
#17
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #17
thats on the stock e7 heads but i also had the heads shaved .020 and a 3 angle valve job with the recommended double springs that match the comp cam.got the head work done for less than 300 bucks.would had them port and polished but ive heard its not worth the money
 
J

joebeez

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
15
0
0
utah
Jul 16, 2004
#18
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #18
i have the same setup i just did the porting myself
 
J

joebeez

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
15
0
0
utah
Jul 16, 2004
#19
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #19
to get the right pressure for the spring we had to cut out a bowl in the head and put bigger springs in along with cups.....that cost a lot more than i had expected
but they will pay off i guess
 

astronut1885

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,899
4
39
Assonet, MA
Jul 16, 2004
#20
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • #20
not to bash you guys, but putting money into stock heads is a waste of time. You threw 300 into millwork on E7s, and I payed 400 for prepped and valve-jobbed GT40Ps with larger valves which kick the crap out of stock heads, even worked E7s. Don't waste your money on E7s.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Roller Rocker Stud Size, GT40P heads
  • foxbodyclark
  • Jan 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 26, 2025
2000xp8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
889
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
415
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Resolved Noisy Valvetrain
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jun 15, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
4K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 19, 2024
PonyGTrider
1
Electrical Headlight harness trouble
  • 1985fox
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
255
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?