• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

1.7 rockers

  • Thread starter Thread starter ECU5.0
  • Start date Start date Jan 13, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jan 14, 2004
#21
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #21
They're hard to find, but occasionally someone will dyno before/after just a ratio/rocker change. Two recent ones in Mustang-related magazines came up with the following results - and they are the biggest and smallest changes I've seen related to just a rocker change. One added 1.7's to a reasonably modified 5.0L normally aspirated. It had the 'usual' - heads, cam, intake, exhaust mods. Addition of the 1.7 rollers actually caused a loss of 1HP at peak. Throughout the range, there was basically no difference before and after - some points it was up by a HP, some points it was down by a HP. CarCraft recently built a carbed motor based on a stock block HO 5.0L with HO cam, AFR165 heads. Addition of 1.7's added 17HP to their set up - they attributed it to the fact that the head wanted all the additional lift it could get.

For your stock engine, if you're getting them inexpensively, they probably won't hurt anything and I'd install them. However, I wouldn't get to excited about potential gains. If you pick up 5HP at peak, I'd consider that a win - so be sure you're getting them cheap.
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Jan 14, 2004
#22
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #22
yeah, im gettin them for 100 bucks installed. im also thinkin about gettin a cobra upper and lower intake...if i get this job i want...for cheap....would that help the situation with the rockers?
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 14, 2004
#23
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #23
Some, but those stock heads are killing you!
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Jan 14, 2004
#24
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #24
Gearbanger 101 said:
Some, but those stock heads are killing you!
Click to expand...

yeah i know. but i really cant afford to not have my car for more than two days or so. especially since the guy who does all my work can only do it at night when he gets off work. so a head job would take him a week to do. how much does it cost to get a set of heads ported? maybe i can do that over my spring break since i wont need my car anyway. except that will probably take more than a week to do. any suggestions
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jan 14, 2004
#25
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #25
You might want to PM thumper460. He's the man to speak to in regards to E7TE's. He's got himself a nice little business going and should be able to turn a set of castings around for you in no time. If you want to save a few bucks....while you have the heads off, you might want to PM tmoss and have him port a lower stock intake manifold for you. After all is said and done, a properly ported stock intake manifold should flow as well as a comparable Cobra at a fraction of the cost. I've personally got ported E7TE's and welded/ported lower intake (all done by myself), 1.7rr, full Mac exhaust, home build CAI, gears, pullies, etc, etc and my car screams. It's a lot faster than other cars with a lot more expensive parts in them. Just don't be fooled into thinking that because it's got modified stock parts, isn't an expensive aftermarket casting, or doesn't flow the highest peek figures, that it's not going to run. That's a common mistake that often leaves people with empty wallets and sad expressions on their face after a guy with a minimum wage Mustang wipes the floor with them.
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Jan 14, 2004
#26
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #26
awesome...thanks for the advice....ill have to check that out.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Jan 14, 2004
#27
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #27
The stock lower intake is a big bottle neck to flow - tmoss' ported lower, or a Cobra intake will likely make a much more noticeable difference than the rockers. If you only have $100 to spend, tmoss' ported lower will likely leave you smiling more than the rockers will.
 

ECU5.0

Banned
Jan 10, 2004
1,803
1
0
raleigh, nc
Jan 14, 2004
#28
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #28
Michael Yount said:
The stock lower intake is a big bottle neck to flow - tmoss' ported lower, or a Cobra intake will likely make a much more noticeable difference than the rockers. If you only have $100 to spend, tmoss' ported lower will likely leave you smiling more than the rockers will.
Click to expand...

well i think im gonna go with a cobra upper and lower anyways. well that is if i can get the money.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

1970 Barn Find Questions
  • DukeOfValencia
  • Sep 11, 2021
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
865
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Sep 11, 2021
DukeOfValencia
Progress Thread 91 GT - 5 lug swap, suspension upgrade, restoration...
  • Andrews24
  • Mar 31, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 10, 2021
Andrews24
NEW FOX IMPUT/ADVICE
  • Madness7645
  • Jun 22, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2020
Madness7645
G
New member. 1988 mustang GT.
  • Guccijayda
  • May 16, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 17, 2019
Guccijayda
G
B
KB 2.1 on '03 GT
  • Bowtierebel
  • Sep 30, 2018
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
2K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 7, 2018
Dark04GT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?