• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

1.7 RR and B303 Cam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eliaseje
  • Start date Start date Dec 20, 2003

eliaseje

Founding Member
Jun 16, 2002
466
0
0
Ohio
Dec 20, 2003
#1
  • Dec 20, 2003
  • #1
I have an 91 5.0 and I was thinking of putting in a B303 Cam (.480 Lift) with 1.7 Roller Rockers. That should put the total lift at or around .510 Total Lift. Will that much lift work with stock pistons. Duration is 224/224. ??? Thanks
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 20, 2003
#2
  • Dec 20, 2003
  • #2
Are you worried about p to v clearance?
 

eliaseje

Founding Member
Jun 16, 2002
466
0
0
Ohio
Dec 21, 2003
#3
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #3
Opps...sry...Yes, I am worried about Piston to Valve Clearance...
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Dec 21, 2003
#4
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #4
I have this setup, advanced 2* as well and have no problems.
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 21, 2003
#5
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #5
90Mustang - did you measure? What was your clearance?

Eliaseje - p to v clearance isn't impacted by peak lift. Go to this link and read - it'll explain it. The issue in your case is the increased duration which opens the intake valve sooner and closes the exhaust valve later. As mentioned at the link, the tolerances are close, so the fact that someone else didn't have a problem doesn't mean that you will or won't have a problem. Every engine is different.

Ford Racing recommends that with 1.7's and the E cam or B cam, you should measure p to v to be certain. If I'm installing a new cam with earlier opening intake timing or later closing exhaust timing, or if heads are milled, blocks are decked, new heads/bigger valves are installed, different pistons are installed - I always measure p to v. Taking someone else's word doesn't mean a thing on your engine.

There are other issues. You didn't state what the rest of your mods are. But putting a B cam in an otherwise mostly stock engine will probably actually decrease your overall performance - almost certainly if your car is injected. If you've got the mods to support the cam (heads/intake/exhaust) then forget the comment.

http://www.geocities.com/jjonibones/PVC.html
 

SwAmPf0x

Founding Member
Dec 29, 2001
1,423
0
37
Hell Hole Swamp
Dec 21, 2003
#6
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #6
I had ~ .200" clearance with that setup, in other words....plenty
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Dec 21, 2003
#7
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #7
.200" on both intake and exhaust? Identical clearance on both? Just trying to clarify - so many people post that they have no problems, and it often means that they didn't measure at all, they just haven't had any problems - yet. With the E, 1.7's and Y heads, I had .110" intake, .210" exhaust. My custom is much milder in terms of duration - so even larger clearance now.
 

thumper460

Founding Member
Jul 24, 2000
3,022
2
56
Orange Park , Fl
Dec 21, 2003
#8
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #8
512 lift and advanced 224 duration works with or as Mike says!! IF there any mods ... like he said heads milled ,Block decked , or a real thin head gasket.. then check it out!! But stock engine and bolt in!! esp. on the 91 5.0 !! Cool?? Hey.... you best NOT be at the Beach while we are FREEZING here on ConUS!! LOL OMG it is all of 46* here this morning.....( in Fl.)

Just me...........................

Thumper
 

Bone Racing

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
1,075
0
0
Long Island, NY
Dec 21, 2003
#9
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #9
you'll be fine
 

Jkstang78

Founding Member
Oct 14, 2002
1,510
1
38
long island N.Y.
Dec 21, 2003
#10
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #10
You will be ok, I am running that on my car with no clearence problems.
 

SwAmPf0x

Founding Member
Dec 29, 2001
1,423
0
37
Hell Hole Swamp
Dec 21, 2003
#11
  • Dec 21, 2003
  • #11
That was on the intake, exhaust appeared to have more so I didnt bother to measure
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
254
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
851
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
859
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Engine Finishing up 331 build
  • RedFury5.0
  • Mar 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
609
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 20, 2025
RedFury5.0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?