• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-

110 mpg ..........mustang

  • Thread starter Thread starter SONIC02
  • Start date Start date Jul 2, 2008
S

SONIC02

Member
Feb 9, 2003
70
0
7
Jul 2, 2008
#1
  • Jul 2, 2008
  • #1
What's your ideas on this guy? Whenever someone like this comes around the government picks them up and you never hear from them again.

http://video.wnbc.com/player/?id=271843


Sorry for the commercial... don't know a way around it.
 

StangYellow

Founding Member
Sep 11, 2002
1,052
1
39
Jul 2, 2008
#2
  • Jul 2, 2008
  • #2
I didnt click on the link, but what about the GM EV-1 electric car that was all the rage in the 90's..... then mysteriously vanished. How else will the government fund the war effort without taxes from fuel?
 
D

Dragstr05

New Member
Dec 21, 2004
643
1
0
Stafford VA
Jul 2, 2008
#3
  • Jul 2, 2008
  • #3
Seems interesting, but I'm not seeing the possibility.

For starters, at the VERY beginning, it looks like its a carb'd...sorry, but a carb will never be as fuel efficient as fuel injection.

They are also advertising E85 on the car. Unless they are attempting to run a ton of compression, I dont see the benefit. E85 has less energy in comparison to gasoline, so you use more of it which makes the 110mpg even more far fetched.

They also claim 500hp and 500 ft lbs. Lots of power takes lots of fuel. Unless they run a certain metal that can handle extreme lean mixtures and detonation / pre-ignition that NOBODY else knows about, then I dont see how this is happening.
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jul 2, 2008
#4
  • Jul 2, 2008
  • #4
Wouldnt that be nice

Thing is, if they can do it with a carb....they can do it with EFI. You still need to fill the cylinders X amount of fuel...JMO. Maybe he is running insanly lean....like 25-30-1 A/F and figured out how to get enough power for the engine to run properly.
 

mazen189

Member
Jul 31, 2007
424
0
16
I.E. southern california
Jul 2, 2008
#5
  • Jul 2, 2008
  • #5
im not saying this mustang does get 110 mpg,
but i know we have the technology to make a fuel efficiant car that would benifit all.
 

03TrueBlue

Member
May 1, 2008
68
0
6
Harrisburg Oregon
Jul 2, 2008
#6
  • Jul 2, 2008
  • #6
Holley double pumper and 110MPG WOW . My last Holley got around 8mpg
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jul 2, 2008
#7
  • Jul 2, 2008
  • #7
That video had absolutely no technical merit to it and no credibility. And I'm sooo tired of the consiracy theories going around.

Modern cars get poor gas mileage because that's what we demand. No one wants to drive a rattle box, and to make a car that is structurally sound, with reduced interior noise, and seats that are heated AND wipe your butt takes a great deal of mass, not to mention, no one wants compromised interior space for aerodynamics.

The EV-1 disapeared because it was for LEASE ONLY and GM could not make a profit on the car. Simple econmics.

The technical input into this thread to this point is generally very inaccurate. Leaner air-fuel mixtures do get slightly better mileage, but not significantly. Part of the reason is that the peak temperatures are HIGHEST at stoich (14.7:1) mixtures. Simply put, leaner than stoich mixtures make less power, forcing the engine to work hard.

Also, super lean mixtures are not very possible. At 17:1, you'll notice a 'lean surge'. Any higher and it becomes more difficult to ignite the mixture and the engine will start missing.

There was a lean burn honda civic, I believe in the 90's. The problem with lean burn is that emissions go through the roof, and you don't really gain much from it, hence manufactures don't build cars that run lean.
 

geoffsgt

Member
Aug 7, 2005
176
1
16
Baton Rouge, LA
Jul 2, 2008
#8
  • Jul 2, 2008
  • #8
If it doesn't have HCCI, GDI, Hybrid or Electric in the name, it's not the future of efficient vehicles
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
Jul 2, 2008
#9
  • Jul 2, 2008
  • #9
If you guys actually watch the video it's pretty clear the car in question is the black one, and the yellow/green/blue car is just another one of his mustangs. They clearly say that he "doesn't yet want to show under the hood" of the black one...while they show a long shot...of the black one

Best way to get better MPG is learn how to drive like a grandma...next thing is invest in lighter materials and vehicles...then worry about power plant, drive system, etc.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Jul 3, 2008
#10
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #10
Here is a brief article on the same car:
http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080701/BUSINESS02/807010341

They claim 80mpg in the article, which is well short of the 110 claimed in the video. I'd be interested in HOW they are doing this. I'd imagine it involves a LOT of compression, direct injection, and maybe even preheating the air charge. An efficiency of 38% is quite amazing if it is true! That's the kind of thermal efficiency your average coal power plant has, and they have every advantage when it comes to scale and money.
 

Stark77

Member
Jun 11, 2008
501
0
16
Tallahassee, FL
Jul 3, 2008
#11
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #11
I'll tell ya how to get 110 miles per gallon - give me a gallon of Neucastle. and I'll tow your car 110 miles.
 

Wolvrin704

Member
Apr 17, 2007
120
0
17
Milford, OH
Jul 3, 2008
#12
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #12
0-60 in 3 seconds? Why am I doubting that?
 

BennyBlown2v

New Member
Dec 9, 2004
1,233
1
0
Carmel, INdiana
Jul 3, 2008
#13
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #13
Wolvrin704 said:
0-60 in 3 seconds? Why am I doubting that?
Click to expand...

I don't know why are you? A 1.70 60ft is about 3.4 seconds 0-60mph when you have 400 ish hp. Oh hey, my car goes 0-60 in 3.x seconds
 
S

spitfirees20

New Member
Nov 17, 2006
38
0
0
Jul 3, 2008
#14
  • Jul 3, 2008
  • #14
Wolvrin704 said:
0-60 in 3 seconds? Why am I doubting that?
Click to expand...

http://www.teslamotors.com/efficiency/how_it_works.php

Tesla Roadster, 0-60 in under 4 seconds, about 135 m.p.g. translated into a gasoline equivalent. If this car is anything like that, I don't see it being so far fetched, nor that impressive considering the Tesla Roadster is a production car that's already out.
 

Pearl02

Member
Nov 27, 2004
496
0
16
Kansas City
Jul 5, 2008
#15
  • Jul 5, 2008
  • #15
Stark77 said:
I'll tell ya how to get 110 miles per gallon - give me a gallon of Neucastle. and I'll tow your car 110 miles.
Click to expand...

Pearl02.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
FUEL PUMP ALWAYS ON
  • Scwhitten
  • Jun 6, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
179
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Today at 3:14 PM
Scwhitten
S
S
1998 Mustang Gt Rattling sound, cannot locate. Video included
  • studerman1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
171
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 1, 2026
studerman1
S
Removing speedo cable from the VSS
  • 91AOD5.0LX
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
741
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
447
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Sunday at 1:36 PM
joeybuddy96
J
O
93 mustang will not start
  • ole80grit
  • Jan 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
230
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 5, 2025
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?