• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

12s anyone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 40th GT
  • Start date Start date Sep 30, 2008
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

jwgroovin

New Member
Apr 4, 2005
97
0
0
Westminster, MD
Oct 4, 2008
#21
  • Oct 4, 2008
  • #21
Add in cams to the bolt ons the folks have been mentioning and you'll start getting into the low 12s easy. I think there are 3 NA vehicles that have got into the 11s (Justin Burcham, Ron Leonard, and I can't remember the 3rd) but that came with a lot of weight reduction and some other assorted tricks. I know of two non-cammed cars at 12.4.

Track prep and getting time behind the wheel are extremely important though...

John
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Oct 4, 2008
#22
  • Oct 4, 2008
  • #22
autumn_again said:
just watched pass time tonight.

think it was an 06 gt. stock except CAI, no tune, and a sticky set of tires. ran a 13.01 i think.
Click to expand...

That could be possible with stickies. Rare, but possible. Evan Smith (long time Mustang drag racer with MM&FF)a few years ago took a 100% stock manual GT to a 13.3x at Englishtown.
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Oct 4, 2008
#23
  • Oct 4, 2008
  • #23
autumn_again said:
if i went with adjustable ones, would i still benefit from the relocation bracket?
Click to expand...

I believe the adjustable part helps correct the pinion angle, but the relocation brackets correct the geometry that gets altered from lowering the car.
 

NastyStang113

New Member
Sep 12, 2008
1,567
1
0
Florida
Oct 5, 2008
#24
  • Oct 5, 2008
  • #24
kooldawg6 said:
I believe the adjustable part helps correct the pinion angle, but the relocation brackets correct the geometry that gets altered from lowering the car.
Click to expand...

I've been told the brackets have no bearing on the car being lowered or not. All they do is increase traction. I have no idea because I don't have the brackets. BMR is the one who told me this but who knows ...
 

NotQuik

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2000
5,158
29
88
Central Florida
Oct 6, 2008
#25
  • Oct 6, 2008
  • #25
anticubicle said:
That's very impressive for the 3.31's. I thought all along you had 3.55's. 3VStangGT (on SFS) got a 13.0 with 3.55's, XCal2 with Brenspeed Tune and the JLT Intake. He was also borrowing my spare set of DR's

All this talk about N/A makes me tempted to run a few passes N/A when Moroso re-opens.
Click to expand...

thanks man, I'm anxious to go with 4.10's but I have no idea when that'll happen...what'd you run n/a wasn't it like a 12.8 or 7?
 

kooldawg6

mine works really well and can take a fair amount
Aug 31, 2006
1,679
2
38
Central VA
Oct 6, 2008
#26
  • Oct 6, 2008
  • #26
NastyStang113 said:
I've been told the brackets have no bearing on the car being lowered or not. All they do is increase traction. I have no idea because I don't have the brackets. BMR is the one who told me this but who knows ...
Click to expand...

They have to somewhat correct the geometry as when you lower a vehicle you are actually raising the rear axle up closer to the body of the car. On our cars, one end attaches to the body and the other on the axle housing. If you raise the rear axle then the lower control arm no longer has the same angle as stock. By using the brackets you are able to drop the back end of the control arm again. You can use the brackets on non lowered cars as well to help traction, but the brackets help get you back closer to the original angle once lowered.
I'm no expert and this is just a brief "general" explanation.
 

69mach1-409

Member
Apr 21, 2004
81
0
16
South Jersey
Oct 7, 2008
#27
  • Oct 7, 2008
  • #27
From what I've read... the lower the rear of the LCA are, the more the wheels push down into the pavement when driving the car forward. The trade off, because there is always a trade off, your ride quality suffers.

I'm looking to get a set of adj. ones, probably CHE's, so I can reset to stock if I'm not planning on going to the track.
 

crgagner

New Member
Nov 3, 2006
4
0
1
N Oxford, MA
Oct 11, 2008
#28
  • Oct 11, 2008
  • #28
Five Oh Brian said:
Add up the cost of all the typical bolt on's - especially headers, cams, etc. - and forced induction can be less expensive. Sure, there are lots of expensive blowers & turbos out there, but there are basic ones, as well, that are quite affordable.

I went with the most basic, non-intercooled supercharger out there (a Vortech V2 S-trim). $3700 for the complete kit (including injectors, fuel pumps, tuner, blower, brackets, inlet/discharge tubes, surge valve, high flow air filter, etc.). $900 to install. $450 to dyno tune. Last week I ran a 12.57 @ 110+ in the 1/4 mile.

Staying N/A and running mid 12's is easy, but the cost is about the same as a basic blower. And a basic blower is easy to upgrade for much more power. You are very limited staying N/A.
Click to expand...

+1 on this, I have the Paxton Novi 1200 SL self lubricating system and a set of delete plates making 412 hp and 374 tq. Cost me $3745.00 and its polished. Install took about 6 hrs.
 
K

kevanp

New Member
Aug 23, 2008
74
0
0
South Jersey
Oct 11, 2008
#29
  • Oct 11, 2008
  • #29
12s

I hit 12.6 today

tune,cai,4.10,rubber, swaybar delete, rear control arms
 

NastyStang113

New Member
Sep 12, 2008
1,567
1
0
Florida
Oct 11, 2008
#30
  • Oct 11, 2008
  • #30
kooldawg6 said:
They have to somewhat correct the geometry as when you lower a vehicle you are actually raising the rear axle up closer to the body of the car. On our cars, one end attaches to the body and the other on the axle housing. If you raise the rear axle then the lower control arm no longer has the same angle as stock. By using the brackets you are able to drop the back end of the control arm again. You can use the brackets on non lowered cars as well to help traction, but the brackets help get you back closer to the original angle once lowered.
I'm no expert and this is just a brief "general" explanation.
Click to expand...

I'd say that's what the UCAs are for ...
 

Five Oh Brian

Member
Jun 13, 2007
552
1
16
Pacific Northwest
Oct 12, 2008
#31
  • Oct 12, 2008
  • #31
kevanp said:
I hit 12.6 today

tune,cai,4.10,rubber, swaybar delete, rear control arms
Click to expand...

Outstanding for a car that traps 107 mph and is still N/A! I'd say you're a very good driver and your car is set up really well (weight transfer, gearing, and especially traction).
 

NotQuik

Founding Member
Oct 21, 2000
5,158
29
88
Central Florida
Oct 13, 2008
#32
  • Oct 13, 2008
  • #32
kevanp said:
I hit 12.6 today

tune,cai,4.10,rubber, swaybar delete, rear control arms
Click to expand...


nice job
 

autumn_again

New Member
Oct 2, 2007
356
0
0
Hamilton, NJ
Oct 13, 2008
#33
  • Oct 13, 2008
  • #33
kevanp said:
I hit 12.6 today

tune,cai,4.10,rubber, swaybar delete, rear control arms
Click to expand...

what tires were you running? do you know your tracks elevation?

that is awesome, i am looking into a tune, aluminum driveshaft, and a couple suspension mods, and of course a sticky tire, i hope with practice i can get a run that sweet.
 
K

kevanp

New Member
Aug 23, 2008
74
0
0
South Jersey
Oct 14, 2008
#34
  • Oct 14, 2008
  • #34
Thanks

I appreciate the feedback. I took me a number of passes to get the feel for the car. I had to relearn how to drive it when I got the M/t rubber. Traction helps

My tip to all of you looking to hit 12's is this:

front swaybar delete kit $160ish
MICKEY THOMPSON ET STREET 26X11.5X17 $280ish

When I added these 2 items I dropped a solid 1/2 second for $500 13.2 -> 12.7
$100 per tenth aint bad

Weight transfer and traction woot

My best time was at Maple Grove Raceway, PA
I don't know the elevation. It was about 75 degrees
Car weighed in at 3610lbs with driver. I removed the seats to fit my tires and floor jack. Plus it helps makeup for my fat ass.

see the bottom of this thread
http://forums.stangnet.com/761759-lca-bushings.html
That happened before I could cut sub 2.0 60'

1.6 60' 12.6 1/4 @106mph
27mpg @65 on 87 octane 100 miles per day sun,rain or snow

update DA = 652

nice tool http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-altitude-calculator.php
 
N

NJfourwheeler

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
2
0
0
Oct 14, 2008
#35
  • Oct 14, 2008
  • #35
Hookup anyone? Life begins in the first 60 feet.

YouTube - Kevanp hooking up, ET 12.70 @ 107MPH Atco Raceway

I have to say for Kevanp being quite new to drag racing his driving skills impressed me.
 

firestang70

New Member
Jun 19, 2005
114
0
0
Sardinia OH
Oct 14, 2008
#36
  • Oct 14, 2008
  • #36
DAs have a big factor for ETs to the OP. My car stock best was a 13.55. Added 4.10s,CAI,87 tune was at 13.0s on PNeros (traction was tough). Adding MT DRs would run higher 12s. Added control arms,DS,plates,UDPs best so far 12.60 @ 107, with a 1.63 60',low elevation,temp was 80,not sure on DA that day. The DA where I live is hardly better than 2000. I think with a great DA and track prep a 12.4 is within reach. I would love to run on the East Coast in the fall in some mineshaft air. Get some seat time and have fun.
 
N

NJfourwheeler

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
2
0
0
Oct 14, 2008
#37
  • Oct 14, 2008
  • #37
Another video. Sorry for the long intro, Atco was very slow that night.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPP77lr47nQ

I wouldn't knock him for the red lights in either video. It was his first night on the new tires and the first time ever getting any hookup.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
145
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
932
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
274
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?