• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

13" Rear brake upgrade. Did I just imagine this kit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rickey_Bobby
  • Start date Start date Feb 2, 2007
Status
Not open for further replies.
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Feb 5, 2007
#21
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #21
honestly to keep up with Porsches you will need to increase your power and lower your weight. strip the interior to just a drivers seat and a cage. relocate the battery to the trunk. also you would want a Torsen type differential with a diff cooler. you would definately need to switch out to an aluminum block. for brakes, you will need something like a 6 piston front 4 piston rear kit. you would also need full race tyres, ie slicks.
 

Rickey_Bobby

New Member
Nov 8, 2006
332
0
0
Sarasota, FL
Feb 5, 2007
#22
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #22
I already have several mods that allow me to run neck and neck w/ porsches in my class and am not allowed to run R compound tires. If I could, I wouldn't be having braking issues. I am just looking for info on brakes only. Thanks.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Feb 5, 2007
#23
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #23
If you want to go in deeper and come out harder i'd think you would need to upgrade your brakes. I have the Cobra/Bullits all around and they do a decent job stopping me on regular driving but on a road course i would atleast upgrade to the 00Cobra R 4 piston fronts.
 

Rickey_Bobby

New Member
Nov 8, 2006
332
0
0
Sarasota, FL
Feb 5, 2007
#24
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #24
I want to get the bias fixed before I add even more stopping power to the front.

Do the 4 piston calipers retain the same 13" cobra rotor?
If so, Where can I get these Calipers?
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Feb 5, 2007
#25
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #25
yes they are the same 13"...
http://www.buyfordracing.com/shop/index.php?sessId=4FE870A37238209E0EC836067AAB8E56&cPath=6
 

Rickey_Bobby

New Member
Nov 8, 2006
332
0
0
Sarasota, FL
Feb 5, 2007
#26
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #26
wonder if they are worth the $700....

And I would have to get them powdercoated red to match the rear, gay problem I know... But shiney silver front rotors and red rears would look bad.
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Feb 6, 2007
#27
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #27
Rickey_Bobby said:
I am just looking for info on brakes only. Thanks.
Click to expand...

Well you're not going to get far, you can overdue your brakes to hell and back and you still won't get any closer to better stopping power.

compare: a standard porsche carerra has a 40/60 distro, yours is more of a 60/40 (56/44 is stock) since you got extra weight in the front ie: turbo etc.


tomustang said:
Your problem isn't with braking,
Click to expand...

bdcardinal said:
honestly to keep up with Porsches you will need to increase your power and lower your weight. strip the interior to just a drivers seat and a cage. relocate the battery to the trunk. also you would want a Torsen type differential with a diff cooler. you would definately need to switch out to an aluminum block. for brakes, you will need something like a 6 piston front 4 piston rear kit. you would also need full race tyres, ie slicks.
Click to expand...

tomustang said:
it's weight up front and you can never get rid of it over the porsche guys since they are mid engined, and you are overhead cam front engine, weight distribution holds the key
Click to expand...
 

Rickey_Bobby

New Member
Nov 8, 2006
332
0
0
Sarasota, FL
Feb 6, 2007
#28
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #28
So how about that plumbing setup for the biasing valve? In between the master and ABS?
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Feb 6, 2007
#29
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #29
Rickey_Bobby said:
So how about that plumbing setup for the biasing valve? In between the master and ABS?
Click to expand...

 

Rickey_Bobby

New Member
Nov 8, 2006
332
0
0
Sarasota, FL
Feb 6, 2007
#30
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #30
"What don't you get? The braking capabilities in a mustang are on par
for racing set-ups, the braking force is applied to almost 85% to the
front of the car ALREADY due to overweight in the front , the only thing
you can do upgrade the front brakes to something of a 4 or 6 piston and
get good street race/race pads. If you want to improve braking beyond
that you have to reduce weight on the front end."


I really just wanted to stay on topic but....

First off, as originally stated, I have the FRONTS locking.... I have no problem stopping the front wheels even at 150mph with VERY sticky tires and ground affects (The flat full length pan that runs the length of the car under the chassis to induce a vaccuum between the car and the road at speeds over ~ 100mph).

My car is currently 52/48 weight distribution as of the last time I had it corner weighted. My entire turbo setup added 43.5 lbs to the front of my car. Over 105lbs was removed from the front of my car. Yet most everyone here is telling me that my car is not set up properly to brake fast....

I understang braking dynamics, I understand a porsche has an advantage over a STOCK mustang when it comes to both acceleration and braking.

But please, stick relativly close to questions rather than filling a whole thread with comments based on assumptions. I have stated time and again that my car is NOT anywhere near stock...

Again, anyone with a clue on the plumbing layout for the biasing valve so I can REDUCE front braking pressure without affecting the ABS?
 

LaserRed01GT

Banned
Oct 3, 2006
739
3
0
Clearwater, FL
Feb 6, 2007
#31
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #31
Rickey_Bobby said:
So how about that plumbing setup for the biasing valve? In between the master and ABS?
Click to expand...

With the variable proportioning valves you can completely control the front bias. You can even go so far as to hook up a brake pressure gauge and fine tune the front right and front left independantly if this is going to be a serious road race car. On my 99 GT, I was getting somewhere 1300 PSI on the fronts, then I installed a few residual in-line pressure valves between the ABS and calipers and I reduced the fronts to around 1000 PSI and it helped overcome the stock valve split point big time.

See the thing is on the stock proportioning valve within the ABS, when the brake pedal is applied, brake fluid pressure passes through the proportioning valve within the ABS to the rear brake system until the valve split point is reached. Above the valve split point, the proportioning valve begins to reduce the hydraulic pressure to the rear brakes. With the way these nose dive under hard braking this is not good.

There are all kinds of things you can do to make this thing brake amazing. Stainless braded brake lines up front, torque arm(dramatically reduces nose dive), autox specific front coil-overs, better calipers, bigger slotted rotors, better master cylinder, etc., etc., the list goes on and on. I've ridden and even built some 99-04 Mustangs that handle and brake amazingly. Like everythings else, it just takes money and labor.

Have you considered ditching the ABS altogether?
 

tomustang

Psychotic Member
Founding Member
Jun 8, 2000
3,434
2
78
McLean Hospital
Feb 6, 2007
#32
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #32
Rickey_Bobby said:
My car is currently 52/48 weight distribution as of the last time I had it corner weighted. My entire turbo setup added 43.5 lbs to the front of my car. Over 105lbs was removed from the front of my car. Yet most everyone here is telling me that my car is not set up properly to brake fast....
Click to expand...
Try estimating cg, the placement of your turbo/hardware, and how it still affects braking.

Rickey_Bobby said:
But please, stick relativly close to questions rather than filling a whole thread with comments based on assumptions.
Click to expand...

Well the main question you asked 'is there a 13 rear brake kit', which has been answered so this thread should be closed. Further more if you wish to bs your way to find out how to brake more by 'upgrading the plumbing' and not following real answers then stop asking us. Ricky we know you're an smart guy when it comes to things and others, well, you try to murder the obvious.

Rickey_Bobby said:
I have stated time and again that my car is NOT anywhere near stock...
Click to expand...

One thing you will have to learn is to state your supporting modifiactions so every one can help you properly.
 
S

san~man

O-G
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,546
3
78
A little grass shack on a big lava rock
Feb 6, 2007
#33
  • Feb 6, 2007
  • #33
This thread is getting off the original topic.

If you wish, start another with the current topic.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
513
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
93
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
Sponsored New Release: 2024+ S650 Brembo Rear Stainless Steel Braided Brake Lines
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
195
2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk Mar 6, 2026
MRaburn
Sponsored New J&M Release: 2024+ S650 Full Front + Rear Stainless Steel Braided Brake Lines
  • MRaburn
  • Mar 6, 2026
  • 2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
0
Views
348
2024+ (S650) Mustang -General/Talk Mar 6, 2026
MRaburn
T
Another front brake upgrade question
  • Texas275
  • Nov 9, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
1
Views
246
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Nov 9, 2024
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?