• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

18.7 sec. 2220m (mexico city) is bad time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Luis911
  • Start date Start date May 22, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Luis911

Member
Nov 9, 2005
114
0
17
Mexico City
May 22, 2006
#1
  • May 22, 2006
  • #1
18.7 sec. 2220m (mexico city) is bad time? Now 17.2

My best time is 18.7 sec. at 2220m (mexico city), is bad time???? I feel my mustang is low in HP, compression, etc.
¿Which time is ideal in stock?

Mustang 81 conver. 1990 (but motor 1988 302 H.O. F.I.) 5 vel. + rever.
 

Tonys96Cobra

professional deer "mounter"
Oct 28, 2005
19
9
29
Syracuse
May 22, 2006
#2
  • May 22, 2006
  • #2
222m is about 7000f t correct? Thats pretty dang high! But I think 18's is still pretty slow. You should be able to crack 16's with no prob. I live at 4500 ft and most stock 5.0's here go mid 15's.
 

5.0 con-vert

No soup for you, Joe Rogan!!!
Jun 7, 2005
244
4
39
Boca Raton, FL
May 22, 2006
#3
  • May 22, 2006
  • #3
Luis911 said:
My best time is 18.7 sec. at 2220m (mexico city), is bad time???? I feel my mustang is low in HP, compression, etc.
¿Which time is ideal in stock?

Mustang 81 conver. 1990 (but motor 1988 302 H.O. F.I.) 5 vel. + rever.
Click to expand...

Well, I know the air in Mexico city is pretty bad, but with a 5 speed you should do better than that! Try again, you should get to the 16's.
 
R

Reed

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
78
0
0
BC, Canada
May 22, 2006
#4
  • May 22, 2006
  • #4
2220 m is 7284 ft which is 1.4 mi. That's over 5 times longer than the regular 1/4 mi track a lot of us race at.

Most stock 5.0s will do 14.5 to 16.5 seconds in a 1/4 mile depending on the condition of the car, the transmission and the driver.

I'd say 18.7 seconds is quite fast to do over a mile, so now I'm just thinking that maybe 2220m is your elevation? Sorry, now I've just confused myself.

What was the length of the track?

Edit: Haha, should have kept my mouth shut. I'll say again, 14.5 - 16.5 seconds.
 

5.0 con-vert

No soup for you, Joe Rogan!!!
Jun 7, 2005
244
4
39
Boca Raton, FL
May 22, 2006
#5
  • May 22, 2006
  • #5
Reed said:
2220 m is 7284 ft which is 1.4 mi. That's over 5 times longer than the regular 1/4 mi track a lot of us race at.

Most stock 5.0s will do 14 to 16 seconds in a 1/4 mile depending on the condition of the car, the transmission and the driver.

I'd say 18.7 seconds is quite fast to do over a mile, so now I'm just thinking that maybe 2220m is your elevation? Sorry, now I've just confused myself.

What was the length of the track?
Click to expand...


nice! I think the latter is the case!
 

Tonys96Cobra

professional deer "mounter"
Oct 28, 2005
19
9
29
Syracuse
May 22, 2006
#6
  • May 22, 2006
  • #6
Yeah, if he can do 1.25 miles in 18.7, hes got one of the fastest things on wheels!I dont think top fuel is even that fast
 

Luis911

Member
Nov 9, 2005
114
0
17
Mexico City
May 22, 2006
#7
  • May 22, 2006
  • #7
Reed said:
2220 m is 7284 ft which is 1.4 mi. That's over 5 times longer than the regular 1/4 mi track a lot of us race at.

Most stock 5.0s will do 14.5 to 16.5 seconds in a 1/4 mile depending on the condition of the car, the transmission and the driver.

I'd say 18.7 seconds is quite fast to do over a mile, so now I'm just thinking that maybe 2220m is your elevation? Sorry, now I've just confused myself.

What was the length of the track?

Edit: Haha, should have kept my mouth shut. I'll say again, 14.5 - 16.5 seconds.
Click to expand...

18.7 sec 1/4 mil (402 m), at 74.56 mil/h (120km/h). Mexico city 7283f (2220 m)

. Conv. since 1991, I bought mustang 2005, I need ~16.5 minim

Thanks
 

Luis911

Member
Nov 9, 2005
114
0
17
Mexico City
Aug 28, 2006
#8
  • Aug 28, 2006
  • #8
I ran 1/4 and now my best time was 17.7
And week later my best time is 17.2
My tires are 245/45 17, on street i have 28 of pressure, on 1/4 mile I tried front tires with 26 and rear tires 20. It is good? What are your opinion?

Thanks
 

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Aug 28, 2006
#9
  • Aug 28, 2006
  • #9
i think my v6 runs faster then that. but thats is very high.
 

spiff

Member
Aug 7, 2006
17
0
6
Canada
Aug 28, 2006
#10
  • Aug 28, 2006
  • #10
If its in Mexico city its prolly starved for air that high and its probably running pretty crappy fuel too.
 

5.0 con-vert

No soup for you, Joe Rogan!!!
Jun 7, 2005
244
4
39
Boca Raton, FL
Aug 28, 2006
#11
  • Aug 28, 2006
  • #11
deleted
 

5.0 con-vert

No soup for you, Joe Rogan!!!
Jun 7, 2005
244
4
39
Boca Raton, FL
Aug 28, 2006
#12
  • Aug 28, 2006
  • #12
spiff said:
If its in Mexico city its prolly starved for air that high and its probably running pretty crappy fuel too.
Click to expand...

Its petrol man! The air there is garbage. I could barely breathe for the first few days after I got there. VW pollution. I'm impressed that you found a stang down there! I honestly only saw a handful of domestics in the 3 months I was in the country. You've managed to knock 1.5 seconds off your time by getting better at driving it seems. Have you done any more modifications yet?
 

Strype

Cuthbert catcher
Founding Member
May 11, 1999
61
34
104
Huntsvegas, AL
Aug 28, 2006
#13
  • Aug 28, 2006
  • #13
Luis911 said:
I ran 1/4 and now my best time was 17.7
And week later my best time is 17.2
My tires are 245/45 17, on street i have 28 of pressure, on 1/4 mile I tried front tires with 26 and rear tires 20. It is good? What are your opinion?

Thanks
Click to expand...

Awesome dude- given that elevation and the smog and heat in that area I'd say that's great

Run regular air pressure in the front tires (35psi). Glad to here you're doing better
 

Woodrow

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
183
0
0
Atlanta/Auburn
Aug 28, 2006
#14
  • Aug 28, 2006
  • #14
Pump the fronts up to 44, less rolling resistance .
 

Luis911

Member
Nov 9, 2005
114
0
17
Mexico City
Aug 28, 2006
#15
  • Aug 28, 2006
  • #15
5.0 con-vert said:
Its petrol man! The air there is garbage. I could barely breathe for the first few days after I got there. VW pollution. I'm impressed that you found a stang down there! I honestly only saw a handful of domestics in the 3 months I was in the country. You've managed to knock 1.5 seconds off your time by getting better at driving it seems. Have you done any more modifications yet?
Click to expand...

I only used fuel premium (more octane), the tires skate at start, I have change at 5000-5500 RPM and used 1,2 and 3 gear on goal.

Thanks
 

Curse

Member
Apr 8, 2004
791
2
16
El Paso, TX
Aug 28, 2006
#16
  • Aug 28, 2006
  • #16
Tonys89GT said:
222m is about 7000f t correct? Thats pretty dang high! But I think 18's is still pretty slow. You should be able to crack 16's with no prob. I live at 4500 ft and most stock 5.0's here go mid 15's.
Click to expand...
Finally someone who feels my pain.
 

90blacknight

Member
Apr 11, 2006
136
0
18
Aug 29, 2006
#17
  • Aug 29, 2006
  • #17
I imagine the fuel they use is water with fizz and the air a nice balance of toxic chemicals.
 

Aliate X

Member
May 9, 2005
602
1
18
Rockland NY
Aug 29, 2006
#18
  • Aug 29, 2006
  • #18
If your only trapping 74mph, even at that elevation, your car is definitally down on some power. Time for a tune up, and clean your mass air meter.
 

Tonys96Cobra

professional deer "mounter"
Oct 28, 2005
19
9
29
Syracuse
Aug 29, 2006
#19
  • Aug 29, 2006
  • #19
Curse said:
Finally someone who feels my pain.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it sucks! You see people brag about their 13 sec passes with only a K&N and some exhaust.
 

S&B

I hate my CT. :(
10 Year Member
Dec 18, 2005
1,634
695
204
Cheesehead
Aug 29, 2006
#20
  • Aug 29, 2006
  • #20
are mexican seconds slower than american seconds?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

JCBeaver's 1993 GT Coyote Swap "The Never-Ending Project"
  • JCBeaver
  • Aug 13, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 8 9 10
Replies
182
Views
33K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2020
JCBeaver
The "Extra Engine" Post....hmmm
  • Wayne Waldrep
  • Jan 17, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 3, 2020
Wayne Waldrep
J
351w swap in 2004 questions (set up like a 95 Cobra)
  • jonathansw1601
  • Mar 24, 2018
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
3K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2018
jonathansw1601
J
R
  • Locked
SOLD 1964 Weber Carbureted 289 Hipo $10k Firm
  • Robert Campbell
  • Sep 5, 2016
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
7K
Engine and Power Adder Sep 17, 2016
Robert Campbell
R
Need Help: Head Gaskets Leaking
  • FoMoCo17
  • Jun 7, 2012
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 7, 2012
FoMoCo17
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?