• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

18" wheels on 65 66 fastback

  • Thread starter Thread starter tos
  • Start date Start date Nov 18, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

tos

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2001
896
68
59
Cincinnati Ohio
Nov 18, 2005
#1
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #1
Gettin ready to buy my wheels and I was wondering if anybody here has put 18" wheels on there 65 or 66 stang? Any problems with rubbing or turning? My thoughts are 18x8 in the front and 18x9 or 10 for the rear. Any advice or pics would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Nov 18, 2005
#2
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #2
18 x 8 ft and 18 x 9 rear will fit; you've just got to get the right backspace and downsize the tires and roll the fender lips.

Going by my experience with 17 x 8's, 5.00 backspace, and 235/45-17's on a '65, first I'd advise you to go with that same 5.00 backspace. That might be too much, but it's a lot easier to use a 7/32" spacer (like I have on the fronts) to take out too much BS, than it is to add BS if you start with too little.

Second, I'd advise a maximum 235 cross section in front, with a 40 aspect ratio, and a 245/40 in the rear. You might be able to fit a 255/35 in the rear, but I would measure carefully before mounting them.

What rims are you looking at. (Please don't say Torque Thrust II's. Anything but TT II's, the OE rim of the Aughties.)
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Nov 18, 2005
#3
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #3
I agree with 180 Out.

However, I think you should go with a narrower rim. 18x8's will fit up front with a skinny tire, but it'll look a little funny. 18x7's would look better as you'd actually have a little bulge in the tire. Same goes for the rears.

I have 18x9's in the front of my 70 (69/70's have more room) and I wish I would have went with an 18x8 instead.
 
0

06cobra

Member
Feb 12, 2004
146
0
16
Nov 18, 2005
#4
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #4
180 out..... You have any pictures of your car to share?

BTW: With the 235s did you have to roll the lips?
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Nov 18, 2005
#5
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #5
Does Daddy have pix of his baby? Maybe a few:

http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/forums/photopost486/showphoto.php?photo=91&sort=1&cat=500&page=1
http://www.mustangmods.com/data/9461/ride_height_5305.jpg
http://www.mustangmods.com/data/9461/resized_2.jpg
http://www.mustangmods.com/data/9461/resized_6.jpg
http://www.mustangmods.com/data/9461/resized_1.jpg

To answer your question, yes the P.O. had rolled all the fender lips. I also had to cut a small bit of the pinch weld from the bottom of the passenger wheel well in front, to clear the tire at full right lock.

To answer your next question, the rims are the "Raceline" brand, and the model is "GT." Available painted dark grey metallic or polished aluminum, with tri-bar spinners also available. I got them at Les Schwab, a California tire store chain.

I have a question: how do you link to an image in this forum so that the pic appears in your post?
 

70vert

New Member
Dec 31, 2004
722
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Nov 18, 2005
#6
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #6
lookin' real good . . .

that's a nice look, I think you have the stance and the wheels nailed there. Those are 17"s, though, right? What's are the tire specs?


180 Out said:
Does Daddy have pix of his baby? Maybe a few:

http://forums.vintage-mustang.com/forums/photopost486/showphoto.php?photo=91&sort=1&cat=500&page=1
http://www.mustangmods.com/data/9461/ride_height_5305.jpg
http://www.mustangmods.com/data/9461/resized_2.jpg
http://www.mustangmods.com/data/9461/resized_6.jpg
http://www.mustangmods.com/data/9461/resized_1.jpg

To answer your question, yes the P.O. had rolled all the fender lips. I also had to cut a small bit of the pinch weld from the bottom of the passenger wheel well in front, to clear the tire at full right lock.

To answer your next question, the rims are the "Raceline" brand, and the model is "GT." Available painted dark grey metallic or polished aluminum, with tri-bar spinners also available. I got them at Les Schwab, a California tire store chain.

I have a question: how do you link to an image in this forum so that the pic appears in your post?
Click to expand...
 
1

180 Out

Member
Jul 23, 2005
375
0
16
Nov 18, 2005
#7
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #7
70vert said:
that's a nice look, I think you have the stance and the wheels nailed there. Those are 17"s, though, right? What are the tire specs?
Click to expand...

17 x 8's, 5.00 B.S., 235/45-17's.

Thanks for the kind words. The car is currently all blown apart for a Fays2 Watts link and Slide-A-Link traction bar install, and replacement of all four springs. The previous setup was an easy bolt-in of some 4.5 leaf springs from Maier Racing and two passes at cutting the coils to match. The 2nd pic is the only one to show the results of the coil cutting. The new setup currently in progress has had me rejecting two sets of 4-leaf springs (too high!), and finally taking a leaf off one set and bolting it upside down on the other to get a good ride height. I expect to have to do some coil cutting again, to get the front to match the rear.
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Nov 18, 2005
#8
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #8
I like 17s

Seemed like the best comprise of sidewall to wheel for what I wanted to do with the car

But....18s should fit easily enough with the same rules as 17s

 
D

DrStang

New Member
Aug 22, 2004
41
0
0
Nov 18, 2005
#9
  • Nov 18, 2005
  • #9
As for BS, my '65 has a 17x8 in the rear with 5.25 BS with no rubbing or need for fender rolling. I have 255/40/17's mounted on a stock drum config.
 
M

MDinDestin

New Member
Jul 16, 2005
58
0
0
Nov 19, 2005
#10
  • Nov 19, 2005
  • #10
dodgestang said:
I like 17s

Seemed like the best comprise of sidewall to wheel for what I wanted to do with the car

But....18s should fit easily enough with the same rules as 17s

http://www.dodgestang.com/track2.jpg]
Click to expand...

Nice ride, what are the sizes on this set up?
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Nov 20, 2005
#11
  • Nov 20, 2005
  • #11
17x8 4.75

245 40 17 in the front (all the time)
275 40 17 in the rear (track only Drag radials that rub on bumps and tight turns, but work perfect for straight lines)
255 40 17 in the rear (on the street)
 
E

elaudtr

New Member
Dec 19, 2007
11
0
1
San Diego, California
Dec 19, 2007
#12
  • Dec 19, 2007
  • #12
18's on a 1966 Fastback

tos said:
Gettin ready to buy my wheels and I was wondering if anybody here has put 18" wheels on there 65 or 66 stang? Any problems with rubbing or turning? My thoughts are 18x8 in the front and 18x9 or 10 for the rear. Any advice or pics would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
Click to expand...

See this other discussion about 18" on a 1965 or 1966 Mustang.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=721195

That is my Red 1966 GT Fastback.

I went with:
Wheels and Tires
18x7 Front with 225/40/18 and 4.50 backspacing
18x8 Rear with 245/40/18 and 4.75 backspacing with SSBC rear disc - I had to roll the rear quarters, because i rubbed hard. I wish I went with 5.00 backspacing in the rear.

Suspension
Front - 620 coils, cut by previous owner about 3/4 of a turn- no rubbing and tucked

Rear - 4.50 Leaf Mideye stock 8" rear - rubbing with 3 or more passengers

<center>
<a href="http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh15/elaudtr/1006.jpg" target="_blank">
<img src="http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh15/elaudtr/th_1006.jpg"></a>
</center>

<center>
<a href="http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh15/elaudtr/1966GT18s.jpg" target="_blank">
<img src="http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh15/elaudtr/th_1966GT18s.jpg"></a>
</center>
 
6

65kcode

Member
Mar 31, 2007
73
0
6
Deer Park, WA
Dec 20, 2007
#13
  • Dec 20, 2007
  • #13
dodgestang said:
17x8 4.75

245 40 17 in the front (all the time)
275 40 17 in the rear (track only Drag radials that rub on bumps and tight turns, but work perfect for straight lines)
255 40 17 in the rear (on the street)
Click to expand...

What have you done to the suspension? I love the stance of your car!!
Please share your setup.

Kevin
 

dodgestang

Active Member
Dec 15, 2003
1,360
0
37
Cecil County, MD
Dec 20, 2007
#14
  • Dec 20, 2007
  • #14
65kcode said:
What have you done to the suspension? I love the stance of your car!!
Please share your setup.

Kevin
Click to expand...

Front:
620 drop 1 inch drop in the front
lowered a-arm aka shelby (arning) mod with open tracker upper and moog lowers
Roller spring perches
IAS Shocks
1 1/8 sway

rear
5 leaf mid eye
KYB Gas-a-just
Evolution Watts link to keep it all centered
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Dec 21, 2007
#15
  • Dec 21, 2007
  • #15
Put some 20's and bag it

I personally like the way it came out and would like to do this but.............., i know people will start pissing and moaning though




heres my buddies:
620's,5 leaf mif eyes with 215/45 and 275/40's,17X7 and 17X8(he copied me)
View attachment 341105
View attachment 341107

and mine same size wheels and tires but lower
View attachment 341109
View attachment 341111
 

Attachments

  • mu5.webp
    67.9 KB · Views: 1,437
  • mu4.webp
    80.2 KB · Views: 1,108
  • mu3.webp
    61.6 KB · Views: 17,808
Reactions: wilram1

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Dec 25, 2007
#16
  • Dec 25, 2007
  • #16
roll on the 22's and bag it...
 
M

mattj25

New Member
Nov 27, 2007
29
0
1
Dec 30, 2007
#17
  • Dec 30, 2007
  • #17
what is the backspacing on the wheels of your buddies regular coupe?
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Dec 30, 2007
#18
  • Dec 30, 2007
  • #18
mattj25 said:
what is the backspacing on the wheels of your buddies regular coupe?
Click to expand...
if you talking to me,its a 4.75 BS
 
M

mattj25

New Member
Nov 27, 2007
29
0
1
Dec 30, 2007
#19
  • Dec 30, 2007
  • #19
Its a 4.75 bs on the 17x7 and 17x8 is that correct? I'm talking about your buddies coupe.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Dec 30, 2007
#20
  • Dec 30, 2007
  • #20
mattj25 said:
Its a 4.75 bs on the 17x7 and 17x8 is that correct? I'm talking about your buddies coupe.
Click to expand...

the fronts im not sure about,but the rears, i measured the rears myself to get the BS i needed.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Best tire size for 91 Fox 18x9 wheels. On coilovers
  • hassler
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
376
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
KRUISR
O
SOLD FS: 18" FR500 chrome wheels and Toyo tires
  • optionizerSS
  • May 21, 2026
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
1
Views
76
Other Classifieds Jun 2, 2026
optionizerSS
O
305-45-17 tires on Pony wheels (17")?
  • TTSaleen
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
391
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 1, 2026
limp
18” vs. 17” wheels on fox
  • dz01
  • Nov 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 28, 2024
2000xp8
2
Electrical mayhem
  • 2000ElectricGreen
  • Mar 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
220
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 24, 2026
2000ElectricGreen
2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?