• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

18's really to big on a 65-66? pics inside!

  • Thread starter Thread starter 12sec67
  • Start date Start date Sep 24, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
M

MDinDestin

New Member
Jul 16, 2005
58
0
0
Sep 24, 2007
#21
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #21
BullittStangV8 said:
18's in the rear, 17's in the front would look perfet. I like seeing a little rubber before the front lip.
Click to expand...

Agree.
 

Tubo(2-bo)

Member
Mar 25, 2004
279
0
16
Ft Walton Beach FL.
Sep 24, 2007
#22
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #22
Though it really doesnt look like total Ass, I am forced to ask, " WHERE THE HECK IS SOARING WHEN YA REALLY NEED HIM ????" Hehheh

The modern Bullett copies of "TT's of the era", doesnt go with the stockish look of the body. JMHO
 

billbanshee

New Member
Jun 19, 2005
54
0
0
Sep 24, 2007
#23
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #23
 

project.65

New Member
Sep 18, 2007
45
0
0
Sep 24, 2007
#24
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #24
I always thought 18's would look 2 big for 65-66 mustangs but those wheels really fit that car well
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Sep 24, 2007
#25
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #25
Personally I'd rather have 17's up front, for some reason they just look too big up front. Rear is ok, but its borderline to narrow for the wheel diameter. Then again, Ive always liked the look of staggered setups like that.
 
6

67efivert

Member
Jan 26, 2003
348
0
16
lincolnton nc
Sep 24, 2007
#26
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #26
those look good to me because they are tucked in the front i think anything wider looks funny on a 65-66 in any rim size but i do perfer 16's on 65-66 cars
 
J

JamesW

Member
Jul 15, 2005
64
0
6
Central Texas
Sep 24, 2007
#27
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #27
Looks nice..but a little too big for my taste. I like up to 16s on a classic.
 

project.65

New Member
Sep 18, 2007
45
0
0
Sep 24, 2007
#28
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #28
67efivert said:
those look good to me because they are tucked in the front i think anything wider looks funny on a 65-66 in any rim size but i do perfer 16's on 65-66 cars
Click to expand...

I have 17x8 on all 4 corners and I have enough room to tuck my front just like that too. Backspacing helps a lot. Im just saving up for my new suspension to do the drop.
 
F

fordkid

New Member
May 28, 2007
69
0
0
Sep 24, 2007
#29
  • Sep 24, 2007
  • #29
I was shaking my head when I read the title of the thread, But those look great on that car. If the wheels were chrome then it would probably over power the car, but these match the rest of the car, you notice them but it doesn't take all your attention. too bad there too big for my driving. had some trouble fitting 17's that I barrowed from a friend, good thing I found out before I spent money.


Ford Kid
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Sep 25, 2007
#30
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #30
I think it looks great.

Here's a pic of my '70 Grande with 18x8's on 245/40/18 up front and 18x9's with 275/35/18 in the rear.

 
H

Helmantel

New Member
Aug 9, 2006
206
1
0
Sep 25, 2007
#31
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #31
I think 17's would look better (or actually, 16's, but I'm a bit conservative), but they do look nice. The fact that it's a beautiful car with a great stance also helps. Plus that they're grey/polished instead of chrome.
 

NasaGT

Founding Member
Sep 19, 2002
1,993
2
49
Virginia
Sep 25, 2007
#32
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #32
Very nice
 
6

69 redruM

New Member
Sep 11, 2007
3
0
0
Lewisville, Texas
Sep 25, 2007
#33
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #33
love the 18's

love the front tires

my opinion rear needs 2" taller tires

but i am funny that way, i am going to run 205/55/16 front, 255/55/16 rear
 
T

thekid760

New Member
Sep 10, 2006
114
0
0
Sep 25, 2007
#34
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #34
BullittStangV8 said:
18's in the rear, 17's in the front would look perfet. I like seeing a little rubber before the front lip.
Click to expand...


I agree, 17's in front and 18's rear.

They look great, just seems a little too big in front.
 

steemin

Member
Apr 21, 2005
201
0
17
Ft. Wayne Indiana
Sep 25, 2007
#35
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #35
Another positive response.
I think it looks great.
I am biased though I have 18"s in the rear and 17''s in the front.
However I also like the more traditional look of 15's and 16's as well on certain cars.
IMHO what looks good is influenced by paint/mods/stance etc...
!8's on some stangs look like azz.
The same can be said for 15's
Scott
 

jspagna1

Member
Jan 23, 2007
53
0
6
Connecticut
Sep 25, 2007
#36
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #36
thekid760 said:
I agree, 17's in front and 18's rear.

They look great, just seems a little too big in front.
Click to expand...

+1 There has to be a happy medium. I don't like too much rim and I don't like too much tire eiter.
 
J

jbuening

Member
Apr 28, 2005
399
0
17
Sep 25, 2007
#37
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #37
12sec67, may i ask what these rims are off of or if they are aftermarket? The new mustang bullitts don't have enough dish and look like hotwheel wheels. These appear to have a decent dish on them, which is why i'm asking what they are from. Thanks!

My opinion is the later the car the better the larger rims look, but in this case i think they fill the wheelwells perfectly and you have the stance nailed. Without the stance it would look like wagonwheels.
 
R

ron67fb

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2001
1,117
0
36
SF Bay area, CA
Sep 25, 2007
#38
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #38
jbuening said:
The new mustang bullitts don't have enough dish and look like hotwheel wheels. These appear to have a decent dish on them, which is why i'm asking what they are from.
Click to expand...
There's an 80's Colt wagon by our house that has Torq Thrust-looking snap-on chrome wheel covers. Whenever I see non-dish Bullitts I always think of that wagon.
 

iskwezm

10 Year Member
May 24, 2005
4,159
20
79
Rowland Heights,California
Sep 25, 2007
#39
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #39
I think some 14" magnums with 70 series would look sweet on there.............right Soaring????
 

StangDreamin'

Founding Member
Aug 10, 2002
583
0
16
2nd Ocotillo bush east of the Colorado River; Sout
Sep 25, 2007
#40
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #40
Those can't be 18's, because I absolutely despise 18's on Classics, and I kinda like those guys!

All kidding aside; put me down as part of the "17's on the front" crowd.
Crap! now I'm going to have to re-thinkmy whole "Nothing bigger than 16!" plans for the Cougar
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
Good all around perfornace-ish tires?
  • optionizerSS
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
351
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
TPony
Cleaning up Aluminum
  • limp
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
385
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 13, 2026
KRUISR
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
427
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
O
SOLD FS: 18" FR500 chrome wheels and Toyo tires
  • optionizerSS
  • May 21, 2026
  • Other Classifieds
Replies
1
Views
114
Other Classifieds Jun 2, 2026
optionizerSS
O
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
597
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?