• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

190wrhp with these mods????

  • Thread starter Thread starter fivemustangs
  • Start date Start date Jul 24, 2009
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

fivemustangs

Member
Dec 22, 2007
222
0
17
Bar Harbor, Maine
Jul 24, 2009
#1
  • Jul 24, 2009
  • #1
I have just got my dyno numbers back for my 95 stang today and found they are very low! Even the tuner said tey should be higher with my set up,but not sure why they are not. It was pushing 190wrhp which is about 20 more hp then a stock 5.0 my set up is gt40 heads, trickflow street intake, tfs stage 1 cam, 75mm throttle body, 30lb injectors, 76mm mass air, full exhaust w/ long tubers and flowmasters, forged rods and pistons, 7qt oil pan, main girdle and windag tray, aluminum under drive pulleys, ac and egr eliminated. The car is also a 5 speed! Is there something not adding up in my set up? he said that the cam could be to small for the mods but would that be making me lose about 80wrhp? also there is a small vibration as listed in another form but the clutch gets fully engaged and there is no slipping. The tune is set right on the timing is right and the A/F is spot on and the car idles and drives strong without studder. someone please help me find the missing power!
 

rock4451

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 30, 2004
12
2
29
New Baden, IL
Jul 24, 2009
#2
  • Jul 24, 2009
  • #2
wow that is unbelievable if your e-brake stuck on or something lol
 
I

inphiniti

Active Member
Mar 15, 2003
412
3
28
Providence, RI
Jul 24, 2009
#3
  • Jul 24, 2009
  • #3
fivemustangs said:
I have just got my dyno numbers back for my 95 stang today and found they are very low! Even the tuner said tey should be higher with my set up,but not sure why they are not. It was pushing 190wrhp which is about 20 more hp then a stock 5.0 my set up is gt40 heads, trickflow street intake, tfs stage 1 cam, 75mm throttle body, 30lb injectors, 76mm mass air, full exhaust w/ long tubers and flowmasters, forged rods and pistons, 7qt oil pan, main girdle and windag tray, aluminum under drive pulleys, ac and egr eliminated. The car is also a 5 speed! Is there something not adding up in my set up? he said that the cam could be to small for the mods but would that be making me lose about 80wrhp? also there is a small vibration as listed in another form but the clutch gets fully engaged and there is no slipping. The tune is set right on the timing is right and the A/F is spot on and the car idles and drives strong without studder. someone please help me find the missing power!
Click to expand...


thats very weird. i dont see why he would think that cam is too small, thats the same cam that they sell with the TFS street heat kit. are u sure his dyno is functioning correctly? are the gt40 heads stock or upgrades?
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 24, 2009
#4
  • Jul 24, 2009
  • #4
You gotta give us some more details

Dynojet or Mustang Dyno

STD or SAE calibration

Environmental conditions ... You know ... Stuff like

Was it real hot
Do you live in Denver
that kinda stuff

Grady
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,640
214
Acworth, GA
Jul 24, 2009
#5
  • Jul 24, 2009
  • #5
That's messed up. A stock Mustang puts down 190rwhp pretty consistently. No way that cam is too small. If anything, it's too big.

Kurt
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Jul 24, 2009
#6
  • Jul 24, 2009
  • #6
Something is wrong...that cam for being an OTS cam is a fairly good match for unported gt40 heads.

I would go over the timing make sure you HB is not spun. I would also do a compression check. Other things I can think of to check...

rocker adj./setup (big one)
vac. leaks
fuel psi set correctly/enough
how is this tuned?
 

tealstang67

Member
May 19, 2009
47
0
6
Jul 24, 2009
#7
  • Jul 24, 2009
  • #7
How many miles are on the short block?
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Jul 24, 2009
#8
  • Jul 24, 2009
  • #8
any track numbers? how does the car feel when u drive it?
 

fivemustangs

Member
Dec 22, 2007
222
0
17
Bar Harbor, Maine
Jul 24, 2009
#9
  • Jul 24, 2009
  • #9
I know what you mean I also ***** my pants when he gave me thoughs numbers he said it was low but I didn't think it was that! The GT40 heads are an upgrade and when I bought them they had stiffer springs and were O-ringed. The dyno is a "Mustang dyno" and He has been doing regular dyno runs on it for a while. The weather......well lets just says it Maine, sunny, rainy, cloudy.....but for the most part 70's. He has tested the intake for vac leaks with a smoke machine and covered any that were there. The fuel gauge on the regulator (BBK) says its pushing 47-50 but could be wrong, was dropped before install and is maybe 10psi short of what it says (didn't think of that) but would that loose 80ish hp? The engine is a fresh built 302 so about 50-60 dyno miles? and the car is tuned on the dyno with a diablo chip and he had the tune checked over with the company. But now you really got me thinking about that regulator gauge so it might only be pushing 40psi but still that low? And also the car runs smooth and the drive-ablilty is good also part and wide open. But just ask if you need more info I really wanna figure this one out.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Jul 25, 2009
#10
  • Jul 25, 2009
  • #10
Vibration.... you might need to check that out first.... maybe a slipping balancer... messing up your timing...
 
C

Charlie Allen

15 Year Member
Jan 7, 2008
60
0
7
Jul 25, 2009
#11
  • Jul 25, 2009
  • #11
Go to a drag strip and make a few passes. The tracks' timing system does not lie. 5 different dynos will give you 5 different #'s.
 
S

sl03gt

20+ Year Stangneter
Sep 29, 2003
182
1
18
Jul 25, 2009
#12
  • Jul 25, 2009
  • #12
It sounds silly but my neighbor had a similar issue with his car. At the engine dyno the car was only making 680 hp. After messing with the timing and such there was no more power. Finally the dyno guy was like "What f$%king oil is in there?". My neighbors builder told him to run 9 quarts of Valvoline VP1. The dyno guy put in Mobil 1 5w30 with only 8 quarts. Next pull was over 730 hp. The motor ran better and could handle more timing, final result was 753 flywheelhp. I know this is most likely not your problem but it could be something stupid, maybe as simple as oil or having too much, the car have a chip, heat range on plugs, weak spark, etc..
Our cars with a stock computer and cam don't react well.

Good luck.
 
2

2002BLGT

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2003
2,945
4
59
Bedford VA
Jul 25, 2009
#13
  • Jul 25, 2009
  • #13
fuel pressure should be 39 with vacuum off and plugged , about 31-33 usually with vacuum on and idling , should have 19-17 inches of vacuum even with that cam in it
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Jul 25, 2009
#14
  • Jul 25, 2009
  • #14
Could you post up the dyno sheet? It might help us pinpoint where the problem is.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 25, 2009
#15
  • Jul 25, 2009
  • #15
Yes ... there is a problem ... I'm not saying that
but
Since you used a Mustang Dyno

I've seen them show around 15% lower results than Dynojet

From my research of many combos .....
I'd say you should pump out 260-300 SAE rwhp on a Dynojet

therefore

.85 X 260 = 221 for a low
.88 X 300 = 255 for a high

Of course ... this is just a ball park guess kinda thing

You are just gonna have to look everything over to find the prob

Are you sure your valves are adjusted correctly

Grady
 
D

Daves94vert

Founding Member
Jan 3, 2001
113
0
17
Jul 25, 2009
#16
  • Jul 25, 2009
  • #16
You said you have a vibration. Check your balancer. 30lb injectors and 47-50 psi fuel pressure is waay too much fuel for your mods. Switch to 24lb injectors and a quality maf. Drop your fuel pressure to 39psi and go from there. Make sure all the basics are in order plugs,wires,cap,rotor,...
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,640
214
Acworth, GA
Jul 25, 2009
#17
  • Jul 25, 2009
  • #17
Daves94vert said:
You said you have a vibration. Check your balancer. 30lb injectors and 47-50 psi fuel pressure is waay too much fuel for your mods. Switch to 24lb injectors and a quality maf. Drop your fuel pressure to 39psi and go from there. Make sure all the basics are in order plugs,wires,cap,rotor,...
Click to expand...

agreed.

Kurt
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,296
1,640
214
Acworth, GA
Jul 25, 2009
#18
  • Jul 25, 2009
  • #18
final5-0 said:
Yes ... there is a problem ... I'm not saying that
but
Since you used a Mustang Dyno

I've seen them show around 15% lower results than Dynojet

From my research of many combos .....
I'd say you should pump out 260-300 SAE rwhp on a Dynojet

therefore

.85 X 260 = 221 for a low
.88 X 300 = 255 for a high

Of course ... this is just a ball park guess kinda thing

You are just gonna have to look everything over to find the prob

Are you sure your valves are adjusted correctly

Grady
Click to expand...

I'd say 250rwhp would be more reasonable. In my opinion, all these possible problems that people have listed, such as too much fuel, and adjusted valves and such add up to nickels and dimes as far as hp goes. There is something seriously wrong with this car. He's looking for a big problem, not a bunch of little ones.

Kurt
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jul 25, 2009
#19
  • Jul 25, 2009
  • #19
Daves94vert said:
You said you have a vibration. Check your balancer. 30lb injectors and 47-50 psi fuel pressure is waay too much fuel for your mods. Switch to 24lb injectors and a quality maf. Drop your fuel pressure to 39psi and go from there. Make sure all the basics are in order plugs,wires,cap,rotor,...
Click to expand...

First thing I wanna say to Daves94vert is ............

By using the quote ... I'm N O T calling you out or anything

I just wanted to have the info easy to see which I hope helps everybody
to see something I see as ... Well ... Kinda silly

The guy has a chip
yet
So much talk about this or that amount of fuel pressure

When you custome tune ..............
If the owner then goes and changes things mechanically .............

Well ... That is gonna work against the custom tune

Those 30's aren't gonna be a prob IF the tune was done right

Yes ... I agree with all the others
if
The afpr was cranked up

Then again ... Maybe I missed something above

Was this guy tuning with a chip
or
Was he just twisting the dizzy and jacking around with the afpr

You say spark and fuel is ... spot on

Please define ... spot on

Grady
 

fivemustangs

Member
Dec 22, 2007
222
0
17
Bar Harbor, Maine
Jul 25, 2009
#20
  • Jul 25, 2009
  • #20
When I mean A/F is on its 14.7.....not all the time but the amounts are were they spose to be tuned with a chip, The gauge is off so The fuel pressure is about 40 and the guy said he set it to were it needed to be with his fuel gauge. I bought the balancer new about 5 monthes ago and had it balanced with the rotating assembly within 5 grams. But when the car idles it is kinda a lil ruff and you can feel a little vibration at the idle and when the car is reved a little. And there is a slight vib. when cruizin but I think that is the drive shaft maybe unbalanced? it is an auto shaft. This guy is the only dyno around these parts and I don't think he is the best.... But I will post the dyno sheet tonight, I also found out today that he only brought it up to 4000rpm ( because of vib.) when on the dyno so that would add a lil more power right? its spose to be 5500. but the power stops at 191whp and is a steady line acrost the sheet, with no slop in the charts.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

I
Engine Insane fuel trims +25% LTFT Bank 1, -16% LTFT Bank 2
  • imw_stl
  • Aug 31, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
278
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 19, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
687
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Fox 89’ GT 331 stroker, Trickflow upper/lower, TF#3 Cam, stuffed with forged goodies.
  • 08GT500
  • Nov 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
750
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 6, 2025
08GT500
J
68 Mustang with Foxbody Engine Stalling Issues - MSPNP2
  • JayV68Stang
  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
422
Digital Self-tuning Forum Mar 13, 2025
JayV68Stang
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?