• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

1970 351C Dyno Numbers (you should all be interested in this)

  • Thread starter Thread starter 70mach1
  • Start date Start date Apr 14, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jun 26, 2007
#61
  • Jun 26, 2007
  • #61
SadbutTrue said:
Get her dynoed and document the increase... i'm sure the old guys will appreciate #'s proving they know what they're talking about..
Click to expand...

True
 
7

70mach1

Founding Member
Oct 12, 2000
110
0
0
Jul 3, 2007
#62
  • Jul 3, 2007
  • #62
Huge mistake.

A long time ago when I added my MSD box, I asked the question about Spark Plug Gap. Some folks on this board told me I could make it larger. Like as much as .045 or .050 with the MSD 6AL. The factory is .035

Anyway, I went to the vintage races in Seattle last weekend and many of the cars had motors similiar to mine (except fuel and compression ratio) but 3 seperate crew chiefs told me that .045-.050 is WAY WAY WAY too large and that at any RPM above 4000 will start to blow out the spark, especially with 11.0 - 1 compression (stock 1970 cleveland) MSD box or not.

So I regapped the plugs to .035.

Ummmmmmm, yeah the car revs to 6500 now ! Previously it was stalling out at 4800 (Edelbrock RPM) and 5200 (Blue Thunder).

MAN, I can't believe I made such a stupid mistake. It has been costing me about 1000RPM for 3 years now !

Lesson here, be careful with what people post, it isn't always correct. Me included ! Although I have made just about every mistake there is so hopefully I know what I am doing now......
 

jcode68

Active Member
Jul 15, 2003
892
1
29
Massachussetts
Jul 3, 2007
#63
  • Jul 3, 2007
  • #63
Wow, this is good to know. Although I think even the manufacturers of these products (MSD, Crane, Mallory etc.) document that you can run a larger plug gap as an advantage to using their product. Will have to go dig out the manual on my Crane ignition system now since I'm running at .42.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Jul 3, 2007
#64
  • Jul 3, 2007
  • #64
Yeah...
MSD box won't allow an increase in gap.
You need better ignition to do that.
MSD just gives you more spark duration, not more spark power.

Why not throw a Duraspark distributor in there?
It will trigger an MSD without a brain box.
Then you can throw a high output coil on there and increase your gap .010"...
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 3, 2007
#65
  • Jul 3, 2007
  • #65
pushrod power said:
I switched to the 700dp because the 670 couldn't pull enought vaccuum to open the secondaries even with the white spring. The change was night and day.
.
Click to expand...

This doesn't add up. If your motor now is pulling harder with a larger carb, it's also pulling less vacuum than the smaller one. If you couldn't get the secondaries to open on the 670, you had some other problem. If you now stomp the pedal on the 700 DP and your motor winds up, you are pulling a vacuum but less so than a 670 with only the primaries open. There has to be a pressure differential for the venturis to pull fuel from the bowl. This is what vacuum is. A carb won't work without it.
 
7

70mach1

Founding Member
Oct 12, 2000
110
0
0
Jul 4, 2007
#66
  • Jul 4, 2007
  • #66
D.Hearne said:
This doesn't add up. If your motor now is pulling harder with a larger carb, it's also pulling less vacuum than the smaller one. If you couldn't get the secondaries to open on the 670, you had some other problem. If you now stomp the pedal on the 700 DP and your motor winds up, you are pulling a vacuum but less so than a 670 with only the primaries open. There has to be a pressure differential for the venturis to pull fuel from the bowl. This is what vacuum is. A carb won't work without it.
Click to expand...


I agree with Hearne. I didn't understand what he said either. By the way, I am now on the White Spring too (lightest). However, I started on the Purple(medium), with no secondary crash, went to long yellow, then short yellow, and now white. I still have no flat spot or hesitation. The new set up is indeed thirsty.

Perhaps my 670 Avenger Holley is too small now. I still need to dyno tune and I think the car is ready now.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 4, 2007
#67
  • Jul 4, 2007
  • #67
If anything his motor is pulling harder with the 700DP due to it's being tuned richer than a 670 would. A vacuum gage will tell you if the carb is too small for certain. The 670 is probably a better choice in day to day driving but may limit it in topend power.
 
G

Gud T.B. Blown

Member
Dec 9, 2004
583
1
18
Jul 5, 2007
#68
  • Jul 5, 2007
  • #68
D.Hearne said:
This doesn't add up. If your motor now is pulling harder with a larger carb, it's also pulling less vacuum than the smaller one. If you couldn't get the secondaries to open on the 670, you had some other problem. If you now stomp the pedal on the 700 DP and your motor winds up, you are pulling a vacuum but less so than a 670 with only the primaries open. There has to be a pressure differential for the venturis to pull fuel from the bowl. This is what vacuum is. A carb won't work without it.
Click to expand...


As long as I drove the car like grandma everything was fine, but if I wanted a little more acceleration the engine would stumble and then pull. I tried changing the springs and accelerater pump cams and settings. Nothing worked.
I upgraded to an MSD ignition and had a local Mustang shop install it and also had them tune the carb as it was beyond my limited skills.
They had no better luck than I and in frustration put on a 650dp carb off one of their cars because they new it worked properly.
Bingo, no more hesitation at all. Their diagnosis was that the engine wasn't generating enough vaccuum to properly open the springs on the 670. Whether that was the case or the 670 was messed up ( I had bought it off of ebay) I don't know. All I know are the results and they are night and day.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Jul 6, 2007
#69
  • Jul 6, 2007
  • #69
There had to be something wrong in the carb then, even a stock 302 can be made to run with a 670 SA. Bet the vacuum passage to the secondary pod was blocked.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
First Prev 4 of 4
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
SN95 The Unicorn
  • HANO Motorsports
  • May 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 15, 2025
HANO Motorsports
G
SOLD 2007 GT/CS Mustang Convertible
  • Greg Smith
  • Jun 11, 2021
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
1
Views
2K
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Jun 17, 2021
Greg Smith
G
Exhaust Headers - Myths and Secrets...
  • geoklass
  • Jun 20, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2021
WhiteCobra95
For Sale 1994 GT 5L Trickflow h/c/i Tremec TR3550 Saleen copy - $7000 (Ann Arbor, MI)
  • no_fox_given
  • Mar 21, 2019
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
3
Views
9K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Mar 21, 2019
no_fox_given
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?