• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

1976 302 HO 140HP?????

  • Thread starter Thread starter 92Frankenstein
  • Start date Start date May 8, 2004
9

92Frankenstein

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
223
0
0
Minnesota
May 8, 2004
#1
  • May 8, 2004
  • #1
I am trying to figure out what I am going to put into my mustang, i am going full carb. non-emission, and I want cast iron block and heads, but this seems way low, is there a reason for this? Like is it the cam they put in, or is it the heads? etc...
 
8

85GTlover

New Member
Mar 20, 2004
704
0
0
May 8, 2004
#2
  • May 8, 2004
  • #2
92Frankenstein said:
I am trying to figure out what I am going to put into my mustang, i am going full carb. non-emission, and I want cast iron block and heads, but this seems way low, is there a reason for this? Like is it the cam they put in, or is it the heads? etc...
Click to expand...



Are you sure that is a HO motor? You really want a 85 (210hp) or a 84 (180ish) maybe 83's are up there but beyond that you are looking at all pretty
low numbers. Unless your talking Boss 302's but I know zero on them. I do not think the 76 is HO.
 

sweet~Low~93

New Member
Oct 26, 2001
637
0
0
Toledo Ohio
May 8, 2004
#3
  • May 8, 2004
  • #3
92Frankenstein said:
I am trying to figure out what I am going to put into my mustang, i am going full carb. non-emission, and I want cast iron block and heads, but this seems way low, is there a reason for this? Like is it the cam they put in, or is it the heads? etc...
Click to expand...

well they did call the 76 302 an HO [ see mustang king cobra's hoods']

yes only 140hp. first year for the 5.0 L ho in stang-
that's what started it all....

What's this going in ? year of Stang- 79-86 - 87-93 ?

you can find good 5.0 HO motors from 87-92's cheap now days-
just use your Carb setup on the top end, no problem.
 

fly4spd

New Member
Jan 20, 2004
118
0
0
Las Vegas & Reno
May 8, 2004
#4
  • May 8, 2004
  • #4
1983's = 175, as far as i have figured out
(edit) thats an H.O.
 
9

92Frankenstein

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
223
0
0
Minnesota
May 8, 2004
#5
  • May 8, 2004
  • #5
Hmmm, I thought that newer 302's (87-93) the head was angled differently so you couldnt use the old school intake manifold and carb.

All help is appreciated, Thank you.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
May 8, 2004
#6
  • May 8, 2004
  • #6
92Frankenstein said:
Hmmm, I thought that newer 302's (87-93) the head was angled differently so you couldnt use the old school intake manifold and carb.
Click to expand...

Thats not true at all. You can get an intake off a 1968 302 and it will fit just fine on an 87, 93, or even 2001 5.0. All the "normal" production 289s and 302s can use the same intake. I say "normal" because the Boss 302 had Cleveland heads and required a Boss-specific intake. The early '60s 221 and 260 I believe had much smaller chambers, valves, and ports.
 
9

92Frankenstein

New Member
Apr 25, 2004
223
0
0
Minnesota
May 8, 2004
#7
  • May 8, 2004
  • #7
Hmm, well, that is an awesome thing to hear, i thought i was going to be stuck with the older 70's stock 302's to bolt my carb and what not onto, and it scared me because they hit such low horsepower marks... What is the stock horsepower/tourque for 87-93? I hope alot better than 140HP from 76.. although it had 270 pounds of tourque...


Thank you for all your help, this is helping me out big time.


 

sweet~Low~93

New Member
Oct 26, 2001
637
0
0
Toledo Ohio
May 8, 2004
#8
  • May 8, 2004
  • #8
92Frankenstein said:
Hmm, well, that is an awesome thing to hear
What is the stock horsepower/tourque for 87-93? I hope alot better than 140HP from 76.. although it had 270 pounds of tourque...

Thank you for all your help, this is helping me out big time.

Click to expand...

86 -5.0's use flat top pistons 200hp. [u don't want]

87-92 5.0 are rated at 225hp. !
also could use a 93-5.0... it just uses a weaker piston..

-call around to the junk yards, should fine a 5.0- 87-92 for $200 -$550
with less then 80k miles

good luck !
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
May 8, 2004
#9
  • May 8, 2004
  • #9
you can put a better cam and the some E7's and you could probably make about the same as the efi 5.0. the mustang 2 was really down on power because of emissions. i have a 76 mustang with a 4 spd. the heads and cam sucked on those. put an intake,headers,cam and nice 600 carb and you can have some fun.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
286
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
751
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
814
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
1
Clearance
  • 1993mustang50
  • Apr 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
149
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
2000xp8
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
550
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?