• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

1986 GT with a 93 Upper Intake....

  • Thread starter Thread starter casper98gt
  • Start date Start date Sep 25, 2007
C

casper98gt

Member
Jun 27, 2005
66
0
6
NH
Sep 25, 2007
#1
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #1
Sold it to a buddy because in a Mustang builders book i have says they give good power inscrese. He says it has a good difference in power, but it idles horrible, and its jerky and smells rich and gets hot.

Any thing?
 

cobra1923

Member
May 6, 2005
68
0
6
Baltimore
Sep 25, 2007
#2
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #2
I don't think there is any material difference between the '93 upper and the '86 upper? A '93 from a cobra is a different story and would require the lower also. Idle / jerky etc probably be vacuum related
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Sep 25, 2007
#3
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #3
86-93 Mustang upper and lowers are the same. He might have adjusted TPS wrong.
 

cobra1923

Member
May 6, 2005
68
0
6
Baltimore
Sep 25, 2007
#4
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #4
good point with TPS.

Since it was an intake replacement it's either TPS / IAC / EGR or misc vacuum port leak
 
C

casper98gt

Member
Jun 27, 2005
66
0
6
NH
Sep 25, 2007
#5
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #5
I just removed it from my car. I have a 93 that just recived a trickflow. He has a stock 86 GT. I remember somewhere that they flow beter. So i let him install it. He installed and came to my dealership and it runs like junk. I cant be sure anything didnt fall down or something like that. But my car ran like a top before i removed it. TPS didnt move or anything. He put his EGR on thats all. Maybe he cleaned out the egr. But i dont know. I was hoping someone may have had this problem.
 

stang&2Birds

Founding Member
May 4, 2000
2,091
5
58
New England. :-) CT/MA
Sep 25, 2007
#6
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #6
Sigh, You do NOT adjust the TPS!!!!!!!!
PLEASE STOP SPREADING THAT RICER BS MYTH!

The '86 *uppers* were unique. They were tuned more for the low-end and mid-range. In other words, they were tuned more for REAL WORLD DRIVING! But, real world driving power doesn't sell cars like better qtr mile times. So, the 87-93 uppers were tuned more for mid-range and high-end. Also, the E6 heads, which again are better for real world driving, were replaced by the truck E7 heads. Again, to get better qtr mile times.

That's why a stock '86 5.0 is FASTER in the 1/8th mile, from a dead stop, and in the street were you can't "light up the tires".

So, the "massive" gains that the 87+ upper will give are mainly BS. You'll see around 5+ HP above 3K rpms. As I've said MANY times, if someone is going over 3K rpms on the road, they don't have a clue on how to drive!

Uhm, I did switch to the 87+ upper and then to the Explorer intake. Yea, I gave up low-end and mid-range power. BFD, the 5.0 has plenty as it is. But, my point is that the "massive gains" that people often claim are as PURE BS as "adjusting the TPS".

About the TPS:
Read:
http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/Mustang-TPS-FAQ.html
From someone that has an MS degree in Computer Engineering and does this stuff for a living - me![/QUOTE]
 

stang&2Birds

Founding Member
May 4, 2000
2,091
5
58
New England. :-) CT/MA
Sep 25, 2007
#7
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #7
Opps, dup post
 
C

casper98gt

Member
Jun 27, 2005
66
0
6
NH
Sep 25, 2007
#8
  • Sep 25, 2007
  • #8
Wow.....you have alot of time on youre hands and to me that was a complete waste of reading. Being a ford tech what i read on Mustang forums...i kinda take with a grain of salt. We know you cant adjust a ford tps. Thats a given. Aftermarket TB's do have a provision on them in which the TPS is bolted to that has slots built in to adjust them.
 

cobra1923

Member
May 6, 2005
68
0
6
Baltimore
Sep 26, 2007
#9
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #9
I guess all those years of adjusting my TPS to below 1.00 on N/A and slightly above 1.00 on my forced induction cars must have been all in my imagination?
 

ttopstang

Active Member
Sep 6, 2007
306
1
28
Birmingham, AL
Sep 26, 2007
#10
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #10
how come ive seen ppls cars run better after we adjust the tps?
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 26, 2007
#11
  • Sep 26, 2007
  • #11
the 86 uppers have a smaller TB diameter - about 55mm or so and do not have the cast in deperessions for the EGR coolant chamber like the 87+ intakes - other than that the runners appear to be the same size but I have not measured them with a cc burrette. My eye is pretty good. The 86 upper could be ported to accept a 65mm TB, gasket matched and should then perform the same as a 87-93 upper.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
778
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
526
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
684
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
175
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
995
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?