• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

1987 Mustang Heads......

  • Thread starter Thread starter Manewaymja2
  • Start date Start date Feb 14, 2009

Manewaymja2

Member
Feb 11, 2009
245
2
19
Feb 14, 2009
#1
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #1
Can someone recomend a good set of Heads to replace my stock Heads, Maybe something that will give me a little Gidiup and help with my Nitrous Application.
 

parrish5o

New Member
Dec 22, 2008
2
0
0
Dirty South
Feb 14, 2009
#2
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #2
This is one of those of questions where you will get alot of different answers, everyone has their own opinion. My favs are the Canfields, but then again thats what I have on my car. Before these I had a set of iron GT40s with a mild port job. Can't tell you exactly how much power I picked up because I did alot of other work at the same time. There are lots of good heads out there. Trick Flow, Edellbrock, Dart. It just depends on what you are putting them on and how much you want to spend. If you are going with a mild setup the GT40s are good and the price isn't bad, if you want to run an 8 sec 1/4 mile you need a set of Yates.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Feb 14, 2009
#3
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #3
Always a fan of the AFR's myself. A set of 165's should net you great power results and keep you emmisions legal at the same time.

Pretty much any of the usual brand aluminum heads (Edelbrock, Trick Flow, Ford Racing, Dart, etc) will serve you well though.
 

Manewaymja2

Member
Feb 11, 2009
245
2
19
Feb 14, 2009
#4
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #4
JUST WANT TO PUT ON MY STOCK BOTTOM, SO WHAT DO YOU RECOMEND NOW WITH THAT IN MIND
THANKS A MILLION.
 

SPEEDYLIFSAVR

Founding Member
Sep 18, 2000
666
0
16
FL,89 LX 5.0
Feb 14, 2009
#5
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #5
Any of the above mentioned heads will be fine for your stock bottom end . I think the GT-40 heads are the best bang for your buck heads . Cheap and easy to get a hold of .
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Feb 14, 2009
#6
  • Feb 14, 2009
  • #6
I would go with the aluminum castings (I assume based on your sig you're talking about the Explorer iron based "P" versions) over the GT40's. Not so much because they will net you that much more power than the iron GT40's (although some of them like say the AFR165 can net you as much as another 40hp in N/A trim and even more with a power adder by comparison), but because you get the added benefit of knocking 40-45lbs off the front end of the car.

Its easier to add power than it is to remove weight, but by going with an aluminum head, you can do both.
 

Manewaymja2

Member
Feb 11, 2009
245
2
19
Feb 15, 2009
#7
  • Feb 15, 2009
  • #7
Ill check out the AFR 165 Heads, but I have not been a fan of Aluminum Heads. Are they that good versus Cast iron.
Please let me know
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Feb 15, 2009
#8
  • Feb 15, 2009
  • #8
i run some TW heads and they work killer.

as for iron vs aluminum. the material aspect they each have their pros and cons.

like iron is less prone to warpage, but it heavier, takes longer to port.

alum is more prone to warp, easier to port and alot lighter.

almost all the good aftermarket heads you will see are aluminum thats where all the R&D is now, the biggest advantage is the weight, the weight difference b/w a set of iron heads and alum heads is insane.

aluminum all the way.

or a budget alterative is some GT40 iron heads, pretty cheap, world products made some iron heads fully assembled for under 1000$ but flow wise all the aluminum counterparts outflow them out of the box.
 

parrish5o

New Member
Dec 22, 2008
2
0
0
Dirty South
Feb 15, 2009
#9
  • Feb 15, 2009
  • #9
I completely agree with going with aluminum. They are half the weight of iron. It was not easy just to lift my old iron GT40s off of my block.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
1987 5.0 speed density Foxbody crank no start
  • Alan2204
  • May 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
256
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
527
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 10, 2026
Noobz347
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
839
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
638
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
J
can you use the heads off a H O 302 to put on a regular 302 engine
  • Jan H
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
352
Other Auto Tech May 17, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?