• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

1993 cobra cam

  • Thread starter Thread starter kevin2m4
  • Start date Start date Apr 15, 2007
K

kevin2m4

New Member
Mar 16, 2004
50
0
0
Barrie Ontario Canada
Apr 15, 2007
#1
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #1
hey all, i was wondering whats the difference in cams between a 93 svt cobra cam and a regular 5.0 ho cam.

would it be worth it to buy one if i have to get new cam bearings as well, or would the gains be nil
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,220
17,902
224
Massachusetts
Apr 15, 2007
#2
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #2
It's terrible. It's the same came used in the 91-93 thunderbords with the 5.0HO

Don't waste your time with one
 
K

kevin2m4

New Member
Mar 16, 2004
50
0
0
Barrie Ontario Canada
Apr 15, 2007
#3
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #3
oh shoot, as thats what this cam is going in... but in a stang motor..
 
K

kevin2m4

New Member
Mar 16, 2004
50
0
0
Barrie Ontario Canada
Apr 15, 2007
#4
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #4
car is a 91 cougar xr7 aod trans with shift kit.
engine is rebuilt 20 over hyper pistons with valve reliefs, mac shorty headers, ported rebuilt e7's, gt40 intake and throttlebody, 1.72 rr's, new everything else bla bla bla the car weighs 3800lbs.

the cam i have now is stock ho stang, i had it polished and i have 10 over bearings i bought... so to use a new cam id have to get new bearings. i just want the car to be fun.
 

grey5.0beast

Cookies should never be DUNKED!!!
Aug 3, 2004
0
1
0
atl ga
Apr 15, 2007
#5
  • Apr 15, 2007
  • #5
S/c or turbo

Seriously the cam won't be the one thing that makes it fun to drive, besides with the 1.72RRs you change the valvetrain specs anyway, kinda like getting a new cam.
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Aug 25, 2007
#6
  • Aug 25, 2007
  • #6
Mustang5L5 said:
It's terrible. It's the same came used in the 91-93 thunderbords with the 5.0HO

Don't waste your time with one
Click to expand...

did the thunderbords also have 1.72 rocker arms?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 25, 2007
#7
  • Aug 25, 2007
  • #7
kevin2m4 said:
hey all, i was wondering whats the difference in cams between a 93 svt cobra cam and a regular 5.0 ho cam.

would it be worth it to buy one if i have to get new cam bearings as well, or would the gains be nil
Click to expand...

From the first link in my signature:

Stock 87-93 Cam Information:

Lift is .444*/.444* - Advertised @ 266*/266* until August of '88, then it went to 276*/266* .

Duration at .050" varies and ranges from 204*+/204*+

85-88:
Lift: .278 intake, .278 exhaust
Duration: 266 intake 266 exhaust
Overlap: 36 degrees, 9.04 factor
Lobe Center: 115 intake, 115 exhaust

89-90:
Lift: .278 intake, .278 exhaust
Duration: 276 intake, 266 exhaust
Overlap: 39 degrees, 19.51 factor
Lobe Center: 116 intake, 115 exhaust

91-95:
Lift: .278 intake, .278 exhaust
Duration: 276 intake, 266 exhaust
Overlap: 39 degrees, 19.51 factor
Lobe Center: 116 intake, 115 exhaust

93-95 Cobra:
Lift: .282 intake, .282 exhaust
Duration: 270 intake, 270 exhaust
Overlap: 33.5 degrees, 15.24 factor
Lobe Center: 115 intake, 121.5 exhaust

1985-08/1988
I.O. 17 BTDC / I.C. 69 ABDC
E.O. 67 BBDC / E.C. 19 ATDC

08/1988 - 1993
I.O. 20 BTDC / I.C. 76 ABDC
E.O. 67 BBDC / E.C. 19 ATDC

The stock 85-88 HO cams are a bit better than the others due to a bit more aggressive intake ramp rate.
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Aug 25, 2007
#8
  • Aug 25, 2007
  • #8
hyperutectic pistons = blah
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Aug 25, 2007
#9
  • Aug 25, 2007
  • #9
Hyper pistons = lighter than forged, has better sealing properties than forged (less expandable), and will hold up fine under boost, until the block/rods crack or bend
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Aug 25, 2007
#10
  • Aug 25, 2007
  • #10
5spd GT said:
Hyper pistons = lighter than forged, has better sealing properties than forged (less expandable), and will hold up fine under boost, until the block/rods crack or bend
Click to expand...

everyone always tells me hyper pistons are really brittle and after a while will start to break under boost or higher compression. hence why they're cheaper.
 

payupsucka

Member
Sep 28, 2003
324
0
16
Keeping it grimy in Fall river MA.
Aug 25, 2007
#11
  • Aug 25, 2007
  • #11
they will hold so long as you keep the detenation demons away
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Aug 25, 2007
#12
  • Aug 25, 2007
  • #12
yeah i have seen alot of people use nitrous and boost over the hypers and they do well. they werent running insane amounts of it, like 5 psi and a 100 shot. but they act fine. for a N/A motor with stock/low compression they work fine, they expand and fit snug in the cyl when it heats up better than a forged slug. i doubt there is a problem running 8 psi or a 150 shot on hypers, like stated above just keep a close eye on things and be on the safe side with timing and fuel and monitor detonation and keep it away. all of which you should be doing regardless of what piston your running.

a good tune will give you the fuel and spark YOUR engine wants/needs and will keep it running good, if the mods are extensive enough to where the stock EEC is having trouble giving the engine ideal fuel and spark for the application
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,220
17,902
224
Massachusetts
Aug 26, 2007
#13
  • Aug 26, 2007
  • #13
enyawix said:
did the thunderbords also have 1.72 rocker arms?
Click to expand...



No not beleive so
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
265
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
B
For Sale 1993 Mustang SVT Cobra - Black - 5 Speed - 88k Miles - Single Owner
  • Buddy Jake
  • Jun 16, 2026
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
1
Views
143
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Jun 20, 2026
Habu135
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
694
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
J
Fox Cam swap gone wrong??
  • Jimmer009
  • Apr 21, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
584
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2025
Jimmer009
J
Hard to start when engine is cold
  • 86_Capri
  • Mar 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
880
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?