1999-2003 mustang gt

[krly79]

 

[GT2000JAY]

Woo hoo - it must be free post time...

 

[stangman]

I agree with you about the MD. Everything I've seen on the MD shows that you have to add about 15% to get a comparable number to a dynojet. HOWEVER, this is assuming the operator entered the correct vehicle weight into the Mustang Dyno.

Sorry if I was unclear.

gotcha & yeah we entered the right weight, he's as much as a mustang nut as i am, he's got three in his driveway right now not to mention he used to be a ford mechanic (& one that actually knows his stuff)

 

[StngStr]

My 03 GT put down 231.3 rwhp on a dynojet completely stock. With 15% loss, that's 272 hp at the flywheel. So, I also tend to think they are a bit underrated. At least mine is. This dyno pull was done in 90 degree weather with 85-90% humidity.

 

[RacerGT]

My 03 GT put down 231.3 rwhp on a dynojet completely stock. With 15% loss, that's 272 hp at the flywheel. So, I also tend to think they are a bit underrated. At least mine is. This dyno pull was done in 90 degree weather with 85-90% humidity.

And I put down 228 down with mufflers on a dynojet in an AUTO.

 

[JonJon]

 

[muzztangman]

Woo hoo - it must be free post time...

 

[decoy562]

I love mine!

 

[Sinultros]

Underrated? No.

Underestimated? Yes, sometimes.