hrspwrjunkie said:
There's actually quite a bit to be gained beyond simple mile per hour change when tuning a set up. Such as improved part throttle launch control, improved reliability, cleaner shifting characteristics through improved RPM control that a proper tune can do for a car that an enthusiast at a track could spend years or more trying to accomplish, much less learn to do when that knowledge isn't extensive or tested. As far as proper exhaust scavenging goes, I know for a fact that luminaries such as David Vizard have found anywhere from 10-50 horses just with proper exhaust tuning. It's a very valid way to gain a monumental amount of power and can equal the amount of power gained by stroking a motor.
Here's a link to a couple articles detailing some of Vizard's discoveries surrounding exhaust tuning:
http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/track/6992/vizard.html
Eh,its barley readable

.
Tuning on a carb for max hp (wide open) is that easy,you get the fastest mph and the plugs still look good.The other circuits dont need much tuning,other than a couple of screws turned to make the baseline set-up Holley gives you run smooth.
Yea,I have read a bunch of differant exhaust articles,but the thing is,is every set-up is differant.
You can dyno two headers with the same lenght tube,same diameter,some collecter size,but still get differant numbers...why?Cause small stuff,differant bends,collecter entrance angle,collector length,blended weld,and even the material.
Now theroy can some times be differant than what actualy works,but basicly...short,fat tubes are for high rpm,and long small tubes are for low rpm.I think most of the shorty headers problems is the they have a terrable collecter angle,tight bends,and the over all length of the collector is bad.
But all this "knowledge" doesnt mean a thing is you dont got the cash to spend on parts,so us it with what will make you the most power.